{"title":"一家主要学术医疗中心失去实验室开发的质谱测试的影响","authors":"K. Aaron Geno , Mark A. Cervinski","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Our laboratory historically performed immunosuppressant and definitive opioid testing in-house as laboratory developed (LDT) mass spectrometry-based tests. However, staffing constraints and supply chain challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic forced us to refer this testing to a national reference laboratory. The VALID Act could impose onerous requirements for laboratories to develop LDTs. To explore the potential effect of these additional regulatory hurdles, we used the loss of our own LDT tests to assess the impact on patient care and hospital budgets.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Laboratory information systems data and historical data associated with test costs were used to calculate turnaround times and financial impact.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Referral testing has extended the reporting of immunosuppressant results by an average of approximately one day and up to two days at the 95th percentile. We estimate that discontinuing in-house opioid testing has cost our health system over half a million dollars in the year since testing was discontinued.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Barriers that discourage laboratories from developing in-house testing, particularly in the absence of FDA-cleared alternatives, can be expected to have a detrimental effect on patient care and hospital finances.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","volume":"28 ","pages":"Pages 63-66"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/0b/main.PMC9938756.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the loss of laboratory developed mass spectrometry testing at a major academic medical center\",\"authors\":\"K. Aaron Geno , Mark A. Cervinski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Our laboratory historically performed immunosuppressant and definitive opioid testing in-house as laboratory developed (LDT) mass spectrometry-based tests. However, staffing constraints and supply chain challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic forced us to refer this testing to a national reference laboratory. The VALID Act could impose onerous requirements for laboratories to develop LDTs. To explore the potential effect of these additional regulatory hurdles, we used the loss of our own LDT tests to assess the impact on patient care and hospital budgets.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Laboratory information systems data and historical data associated with test costs were used to calculate turnaround times and financial impact.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Referral testing has extended the reporting of immunosuppressant results by an average of approximately one day and up to two days at the 95th percentile. We estimate that discontinuing in-house opioid testing has cost our health system over half a million dollars in the year since testing was discontinued.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Barriers that discourage laboratories from developing in-house testing, particularly in the absence of FDA-cleared alternatives, can be expected to have a detrimental effect on patient care and hospital finances.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 63-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/0b/main.PMC9938756.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X23000123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X23000123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of the loss of laboratory developed mass spectrometry testing at a major academic medical center
Background
Our laboratory historically performed immunosuppressant and definitive opioid testing in-house as laboratory developed (LDT) mass spectrometry-based tests. However, staffing constraints and supply chain challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic forced us to refer this testing to a national reference laboratory. The VALID Act could impose onerous requirements for laboratories to develop LDTs. To explore the potential effect of these additional regulatory hurdles, we used the loss of our own LDT tests to assess the impact on patient care and hospital budgets.
Methods
Laboratory information systems data and historical data associated with test costs were used to calculate turnaround times and financial impact.
Results
Referral testing has extended the reporting of immunosuppressant results by an average of approximately one day and up to two days at the 95th percentile. We estimate that discontinuing in-house opioid testing has cost our health system over half a million dollars in the year since testing was discontinued.
Conclusions
Barriers that discourage laboratories from developing in-house testing, particularly in the absence of FDA-cleared alternatives, can be expected to have a detrimental effect on patient care and hospital finances.