一家主要学术医疗中心失去实验室开发的质谱测试的影响

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.02.005
K. Aaron Geno , Mark A. Cervinski
{"title":"一家主要学术医疗中心失去实验室开发的质谱测试的影响","authors":"K. Aaron Geno ,&nbsp;Mark A. Cervinski","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Our laboratory historically performed immunosuppressant and definitive opioid testing in-house as laboratory developed (LDT) mass spectrometry-based tests. However, staffing constraints and supply chain challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic forced us to refer this testing to a national reference laboratory. The VALID Act could impose onerous requirements for laboratories to develop LDTs. To explore the potential effect of these additional regulatory hurdles, we used the loss of our own LDT tests to assess the impact on patient care and hospital budgets.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Laboratory information systems data and historical data associated with test costs were used to calculate turnaround times and financial impact.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Referral testing has extended the reporting of immunosuppressant results by an average of approximately one day and up to two days at the 95th percentile. We estimate that discontinuing in-house opioid testing has cost our health system over half a million dollars in the year since testing was discontinued.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Barriers that discourage laboratories from developing in-house testing, particularly in the absence of FDA-cleared alternatives, can be expected to have a detrimental effect on patient care and hospital finances.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","volume":"28 ","pages":"Pages 63-66"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/0b/main.PMC9938756.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the loss of laboratory developed mass spectrometry testing at a major academic medical center\",\"authors\":\"K. Aaron Geno ,&nbsp;Mark A. Cervinski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Our laboratory historically performed immunosuppressant and definitive opioid testing in-house as laboratory developed (LDT) mass spectrometry-based tests. However, staffing constraints and supply chain challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic forced us to refer this testing to a national reference laboratory. The VALID Act could impose onerous requirements for laboratories to develop LDTs. To explore the potential effect of these additional regulatory hurdles, we used the loss of our own LDT tests to assess the impact on patient care and hospital budgets.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Laboratory information systems data and historical data associated with test costs were used to calculate turnaround times and financial impact.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Referral testing has extended the reporting of immunosuppressant results by an average of approximately one day and up to two days at the 95th percentile. We estimate that discontinuing in-house opioid testing has cost our health system over half a million dollars in the year since testing was discontinued.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Barriers that discourage laboratories from developing in-house testing, particularly in the absence of FDA-cleared alternatives, can be expected to have a detrimental effect on patient care and hospital finances.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 63-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d3/0b/main.PMC9938756.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X23000123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X23000123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景我们的实验室历来在内部进行免疫抑制剂和确定的阿片类药物测试,作为实验室开发的(LDT)质谱测试。然而,与新冠肺炎大流行相关的人员配置限制和供应链挑战迫使我们将这种检测提交给国家参考实验室。VALID法案可能会对实验室开发LDT提出苛刻的要求。为了探索这些额外监管障碍的潜在影响,我们使用我们自己的LDT测试的损失来评估对患者护理和医院预算的影响。方法使用实验室信息系统数据和与测试成本相关的历史数据来计算周转时间和财务影响。结果转诊测试将免疫抑制剂结果的报告平均延长了约一天,在第95百分位延长了两天。我们估计,自检测停止以来的一年里,停止内部阿片类药物检测已使我们的卫生系统损失了50多万美元。结论阻碍实验室开发内部检测的因素,特别是在没有美国食品药品监督管理局批准的替代品的情况下,可能会对患者护理和医院财务产生不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of the loss of laboratory developed mass spectrometry testing at a major academic medical center

Background

Our laboratory historically performed immunosuppressant and definitive opioid testing in-house as laboratory developed (LDT) mass spectrometry-based tests. However, staffing constraints and supply chain challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic forced us to refer this testing to a national reference laboratory. The VALID Act could impose onerous requirements for laboratories to develop LDTs. To explore the potential effect of these additional regulatory hurdles, we used the loss of our own LDT tests to assess the impact on patient care and hospital budgets.

Methods

Laboratory information systems data and historical data associated with test costs were used to calculate turnaround times and financial impact.

Results

Referral testing has extended the reporting of immunosuppressant results by an average of approximately one day and up to two days at the 95th percentile. We estimate that discontinuing in-house opioid testing has cost our health system over half a million dollars in the year since testing was discontinued.

Conclusions

Barriers that discourage laboratories from developing in-house testing, particularly in the absence of FDA-cleared alternatives, can be expected to have a detrimental effect on patient care and hospital finances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
41
审稿时长
81 days
期刊最新文献
Tandem mass spectrometry of serum cholestanoic (C27) acids – Typical concentration ranges and application to the study of peroxisomal biogenesis disorders Research letter: Pilot study of a prototype fully automated mass spectrometry system for routine clinical laboratory use Development and clinical utility of an ultra performance liquid chromatography − tandem mass spectrometry assay for monitoring omadacycline and tigecycline in severe bacterial infections Method validation of an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) assay for the analysis of magnesium, copper and zinc in red blood cells Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometric method for the simultaneous analysis of branched-chain amino acids and their ketoacids from dried blood spot as secondary analytes for the detection of maple syrup urine disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1