Prosilico对ANDROMEDA人类临床药代动力学的计算机预测:对已建立的基准数据集、现代小型药物数据集的预测,以及与实验室方法的比较。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/02611929221148447
Urban Fagerholm, Sven Hellberg, Jonathan Alvarsson, Ola Spjuth
{"title":"Prosilico对ANDROMEDA人类临床药代动力学的计算机预测:对已建立的基准数据集、现代小型药物数据集的预测,以及与实验室方法的比较。","authors":"Urban Fagerholm,&nbsp;Sven Hellberg,&nbsp;Jonathan Alvarsson,&nbsp;Ola Spjuth","doi":"10.1177/02611929221148447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is an ongoing aim to replace animal and <i>in vitro</i> laboratory models with <i>in silico</i> methods. Such replacement requires the successful validation and comparably good performance of the alternative methods. We have developed an <i>in silico</i> prediction system for human clinical pharmacokinetics, based on machine learning, conformal prediction and a new physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model, i.e. ANDROMEDA. The objectives of this study were: a) to evaluate how well ANDROMEDA predicts the human clinical pharmacokinetics of a previously proposed benchmarking data set comprising 24 physicochemically diverse drugs and 28 small drug molecules new to the market in 2021; b) to compare its predictive performance with that of laboratory methods; and c) to investigate and describe the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the modern drugs. Median and maximum prediction errors for the selected major parameters were <i>ca</i> 1.2 to 2.5-fold and 16-fold for both data sets, respectively. Prediction accuracy was on par with, or better than, the best laboratory-based prediction methods (superior performance for a vast majority of the comparisons), and the prediction range was considerably broader. The modern drugs have higher average molecular weight than those in the benchmarking set from 15 years earlier (<i>ca</i> 200 g/mol higher), and were predicted to (generally) have relatively complex pharmacokinetics, including permeability and dissolution limitations and significant renal, biliary and/or gut-wall elimination. In conclusion, the results were overall better than those obtained with laboratory methods, and thus serve to further validate the ANDROMEDA <i>in silico</i> system for the prediction of human clinical pharmacokinetics of modern and physicochemically diverse drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":55577,"journal":{"name":"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>In Silico</i> Prediction of Human Clinical Pharmacokinetics with ANDROMEDA by Prosilico: Predictions for an Established Benchmarking Data Set, a Modern Small Drug Data Set, and a Comparison with Laboratory Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Urban Fagerholm,&nbsp;Sven Hellberg,&nbsp;Jonathan Alvarsson,&nbsp;Ola Spjuth\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02611929221148447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is an ongoing aim to replace animal and <i>in vitro</i> laboratory models with <i>in silico</i> methods. Such replacement requires the successful validation and comparably good performance of the alternative methods. We have developed an <i>in silico</i> prediction system for human clinical pharmacokinetics, based on machine learning, conformal prediction and a new physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model, i.e. ANDROMEDA. The objectives of this study were: a) to evaluate how well ANDROMEDA predicts the human clinical pharmacokinetics of a previously proposed benchmarking data set comprising 24 physicochemically diverse drugs and 28 small drug molecules new to the market in 2021; b) to compare its predictive performance with that of laboratory methods; and c) to investigate and describe the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the modern drugs. Median and maximum prediction errors for the selected major parameters were <i>ca</i> 1.2 to 2.5-fold and 16-fold for both data sets, respectively. Prediction accuracy was on par with, or better than, the best laboratory-based prediction methods (superior performance for a vast majority of the comparisons), and the prediction range was considerably broader. The modern drugs have higher average molecular weight than those in the benchmarking set from 15 years earlier (<i>ca</i> 200 g/mol higher), and were predicted to (generally) have relatively complex pharmacokinetics, including permeability and dissolution limitations and significant renal, biliary and/or gut-wall elimination. In conclusion, the results were overall better than those obtained with laboratory methods, and thus serve to further validate the ANDROMEDA <i>in silico</i> system for the prediction of human clinical pharmacokinetics of modern and physicochemically diverse drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929221148447\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atla-Alternatives To Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929221148447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

有一个持续的目标是用计算机方法取代动物和体外实验室模型。这种替代要求替代方法的成功验证和相当好的性能。我们开发了一个基于机器学习、适形预测和新的基于生理的药代动力学模型ANDROMEDA的人体临床药代动力学的计算机预测系统。本研究的目的是:a)评估ANDROMEDA预测先前提出的基准数据集的人类临床药代动力学的效果,该数据集包括24种物理化学上不同的药物和28种2021年新上市的小药物分子;B)将其预测性能与实验室方法进行比较;c)研究和描述现代药物的药代动力学特征。对于两个数据集,所选主要参数的中位和最大预测误差分别为1.2 ~ 2.5倍和16倍。预测精度与最好的基于实验室的预测方法相当,或者更好(在绝大多数比较中表现优越),并且预测范围相当广泛。现代药物的平均分子量比15年前的基准药物高(约200 g/mol),并且预计(通常)具有相对复杂的药代动力学,包括渗透性和溶出限制以及显着的肾脏,胆道和/或肠壁消除。综上所述,该结果总体上优于实验室方法,进一步验证了ANDROMEDA计算机系统在预测现代和物理化学多样化药物的人体临床药代动力学方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In Silico Prediction of Human Clinical Pharmacokinetics with ANDROMEDA by Prosilico: Predictions for an Established Benchmarking Data Set, a Modern Small Drug Data Set, and a Comparison with Laboratory Methods.

There is an ongoing aim to replace animal and in vitro laboratory models with in silico methods. Such replacement requires the successful validation and comparably good performance of the alternative methods. We have developed an in silico prediction system for human clinical pharmacokinetics, based on machine learning, conformal prediction and a new physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model, i.e. ANDROMEDA. The objectives of this study were: a) to evaluate how well ANDROMEDA predicts the human clinical pharmacokinetics of a previously proposed benchmarking data set comprising 24 physicochemically diverse drugs and 28 small drug molecules new to the market in 2021; b) to compare its predictive performance with that of laboratory methods; and c) to investigate and describe the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the modern drugs. Median and maximum prediction errors for the selected major parameters were ca 1.2 to 2.5-fold and 16-fold for both data sets, respectively. Prediction accuracy was on par with, or better than, the best laboratory-based prediction methods (superior performance for a vast majority of the comparisons), and the prediction range was considerably broader. The modern drugs have higher average molecular weight than those in the benchmarking set from 15 years earlier (ca 200 g/mol higher), and were predicted to (generally) have relatively complex pharmacokinetics, including permeability and dissolution limitations and significant renal, biliary and/or gut-wall elimination. In conclusion, the results were overall better than those obtained with laboratory methods, and thus serve to further validate the ANDROMEDA in silico system for the prediction of human clinical pharmacokinetics of modern and physicochemically diverse drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (ATLA) is a peer-reviewed journal, intended to cover all aspects of the development, validation, implementation and use of alternatives to laboratory animals in biomedical research and toxicity testing. In addition to the replacement of animals, it also covers work that aims to reduce the number of animals used and refine the in vivo experiments that are still carried out.
期刊最新文献
Introducing the COST Action 'Improving the Quality of Biomedical Science with 3Rs Concepts' (IMPROVE). Journeying Through Journals: The Publishing Process and How to Maximise Research Impact. Progress and Remaining Opportunities to Increase the Use of Animal-free Antibodies in the USA. Editorial. An Evaluation of the Replacement of Animal-derived Biomaterials in Human Primary Cell Culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1