德尔菲小组就当前睑缘炎临床实践管理方案达成共识。

IF 1.8 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Clinical ophthalmology Pub Date : 2023-02-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S399989
Marjan Farid, Brandon D Ayres, Eric Donnenfeld, Ian Benjamin Gaddie, Preeya K Gupta, Edward Holland, Richard Lindstrom, Stephen C Pflugfelder, Paul M Karpecki, Kelly K Nichols, Christopher E Starr, Elizabeth Yeu
{"title":"德尔菲小组就当前睑缘炎临床实践管理方案达成共识。","authors":"Marjan Farid, Brandon D Ayres, Eric Donnenfeld, Ian Benjamin Gaddie, Preeya K Gupta, Edward Holland, Richard Lindstrom, Stephen C Pflugfelder, Paul M Karpecki, Kelly K Nichols, Christopher E Starr, Elizabeth Yeu","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S399989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To obtain consensus on <i>Demodex</i> blepharitis (DB) treatment using a modified Delphi panel process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature search identified gaps in knowledge surrounding treatment of DB. Twelve ocular surface disease experts comprised the <i>Demodex</i> Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH). They completed a live roundtable discussion in addition to 3 surveys consisting of scaled, open-ended, true/false, and multiple-choice questions pertaining to the treatment of DB. Consensus for scaled questions using a 1 to 9 Likert scale was predefined as median scores of 7-9 and 1-3. For other question types, consensus was achieved when 8 of 12 panelists agreed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experts agreed that an effective therapeutic agent for treatment of DB would likely decrease the necessity of mechanical intervention, such as lid scrubs or blepharoexfoliation (Median = 8.5; Range 2-9). When treating DB, panelists believed that collarettes serve as a surrogate for mites, and that eliminating or reducing collarettes should be the main clinical goal of treatment (Median = 8; Range 7-9). The panelists would treat patients with at least 10 collarettes, regardless of other signs or symptoms and agreed that DB can be cured, but there is always the possibility for a reinfestation (n = 12). There was also consensus that collarettes, and therefore mites, are the primary treatment target and the way by which clinicians can monitor patient response to therapy (Median = 8; Range 7-9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Expert panelists achieved consensus on key facets of DB treatment. Specifically, there was consensus that collarettes are pathognomonic for DB, that DB patients with >10 collarettes should be treated even in the absence of symptoms, and that treatment efficacy can be tracked by collarette resolution. By increasing awareness about DB, understanding the goals of and monitoring treatment efficacy, patients will receive better care and, ultimately, better clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d5/de/opth-17-667.PMC9983333.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for <i>Demodex blepharitis</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Marjan Farid, Brandon D Ayres, Eric Donnenfeld, Ian Benjamin Gaddie, Preeya K Gupta, Edward Holland, Richard Lindstrom, Stephen C Pflugfelder, Paul M Karpecki, Kelly K Nichols, Christopher E Starr, Elizabeth Yeu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S399989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To obtain consensus on <i>Demodex</i> blepharitis (DB) treatment using a modified Delphi panel process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature search identified gaps in knowledge surrounding treatment of DB. Twelve ocular surface disease experts comprised the <i>Demodex</i> Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH). They completed a live roundtable discussion in addition to 3 surveys consisting of scaled, open-ended, true/false, and multiple-choice questions pertaining to the treatment of DB. Consensus for scaled questions using a 1 to 9 Likert scale was predefined as median scores of 7-9 and 1-3. For other question types, consensus was achieved when 8 of 12 panelists agreed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experts agreed that an effective therapeutic agent for treatment of DB would likely decrease the necessity of mechanical intervention, such as lid scrubs or blepharoexfoliation (Median = 8.5; Range 2-9). When treating DB, panelists believed that collarettes serve as a surrogate for mites, and that eliminating or reducing collarettes should be the main clinical goal of treatment (Median = 8; Range 7-9). The panelists would treat patients with at least 10 collarettes, regardless of other signs or symptoms and agreed that DB can be cured, but there is always the possibility for a reinfestation (n = 12). There was also consensus that collarettes, and therefore mites, are the primary treatment target and the way by which clinicians can monitor patient response to therapy (Median = 8; Range 7-9).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Expert panelists achieved consensus on key facets of DB treatment. Specifically, there was consensus that collarettes are pathognomonic for DB, that DB patients with >10 collarettes should be treated even in the absence of symptoms, and that treatment efficacy can be tracked by collarette resolution. By increasing awareness about DB, understanding the goals of and monitoring treatment efficacy, patients will receive better care and, ultimately, better clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d5/de/opth-17-667.PMC9983333.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S399989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S399989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:采用改良的德尔菲小组流程,就睑缘炎(DB)的治疗达成共识:方法:通过文献检索发现有关睑缘炎治疗的知识空白。十二位眼表疾病专家组成了除螨治疗和眼睑健康专家小组(DEPTH)。他们除了完成现场圆桌讨论外,还完成了 3 份调查问卷,其中包括与 DB 治疗相关的比例问题、开放式问题、真/假问题和多项选择问题。对于使用 1 到 9 分李克特量表的比例问题,预设的共识中值为 7-9 分和 1-3 分。对于其他类型的问题,如果 12 位专家组成员中有 8 位同意,则达成共识:专家们一致认为,治疗 DB 的有效治疗药物很可能会减少机械干预的必要性,如眼睑擦洗或眼睑外翻(中位数 = 8.5;范围 2-9)。在治疗 DB 时,专家组成员认为副螨是螨虫的代用品,消除或减少副螨应是治疗的主要临床目标(中位数 = 8;范围 7-9)。专家小组成员认为,如果患者身上至少有 10 个钩端螺旋体,无论是否有其他体征或症状,他们都会对患者进行治疗,并一致认为 DB 可以治愈,但始终存在再次感染的可能性(n = 12)。专家们还一致认为,阿胶和螨虫是主要的治疗目标,也是临床医生监测患者治疗反应的方法(中位数 = 8;范围 7-9):专家小组成员就 DB 治疗的关键方面达成了共识。结论:专家小组成员就 DB 治疗的关键方面达成了共识。具体而言,他们一致认为,领结是 DB 的病理标志,领结大于 10 个的 DB 患者即使没有症状也应接受治疗,而且可以通过领结的消退来跟踪治疗效果。通过提高对 DB 的认识、了解治疗目标和监测疗效,患者将获得更好的护理,并最终获得更好的临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis.

Purpose: To obtain consensus on Demodex blepharitis (DB) treatment using a modified Delphi panel process.

Methods: Literature search identified gaps in knowledge surrounding treatment of DB. Twelve ocular surface disease experts comprised the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH). They completed a live roundtable discussion in addition to 3 surveys consisting of scaled, open-ended, true/false, and multiple-choice questions pertaining to the treatment of DB. Consensus for scaled questions using a 1 to 9 Likert scale was predefined as median scores of 7-9 and 1-3. For other question types, consensus was achieved when 8 of 12 panelists agreed.

Results: The experts agreed that an effective therapeutic agent for treatment of DB would likely decrease the necessity of mechanical intervention, such as lid scrubs or blepharoexfoliation (Median = 8.5; Range 2-9). When treating DB, panelists believed that collarettes serve as a surrogate for mites, and that eliminating or reducing collarettes should be the main clinical goal of treatment (Median = 8; Range 7-9). The panelists would treat patients with at least 10 collarettes, regardless of other signs or symptoms and agreed that DB can be cured, but there is always the possibility for a reinfestation (n = 12). There was also consensus that collarettes, and therefore mites, are the primary treatment target and the way by which clinicians can monitor patient response to therapy (Median = 8; Range 7-9).

Conclusion: Expert panelists achieved consensus on key facets of DB treatment. Specifically, there was consensus that collarettes are pathognomonic for DB, that DB patients with >10 collarettes should be treated even in the absence of symptoms, and that treatment efficacy can be tracked by collarette resolution. By increasing awareness about DB, understanding the goals of and monitoring treatment efficacy, patients will receive better care and, ultimately, better clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical ophthalmology
Clinical ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
499
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Omidenepag Isopropyl 0.002% versus Latanoprost 0.005% in Open-Angle Glaucoma/Ocular Hypertension: The Randomized Phase III PEONY Trial Effectiveness of Suprachoroidal Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide in Diabetic Macular Edema Following Pars Plana Vitrectomy Using a Modified Custom Microneedle Automated Optic Nerve Head Hemoglobin Measurements versus General Ophthalmologists Evaluation to Differentiate Glaucomatous from Large Physiological Cupping: A Diagnostic Performance Comparative Study Management of Glaucoma-Related Dry Eye Disease with Intense Pulsed Light: A Randomized Control Study Evaluating a Sustained-Release Dexamethasone Insert as Adjunctive Therapy for Inflammation and Pain Post-Corneal Transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1