Masaki Kaibori, Kengo Yoshii, Yuzo Umeda, Takahito Yagi, Takehiro Okabayashi, Kenta Sui, Akira Mori, Yuhei Hamaguchi, Kiyoshi Kajiyama, Daisuke Hokuto, Kazuteru Monden, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Yoriko Nomura, Kan Toriguchi, Jong Man Kim, Gi Hong Choi, Je Ho Ryu, Yangseok Koh, Koo Jeong Kang, Young Kyoung You, Kwang-Sik Chun, Young Seok Han, Chan Woo Cho, Young Il Choi, Dong-Sik Kim, Jae Do Yang, Keita Mori, Atsushi Hiraoka, Hiroki Yamaue, Masafumi Nakamura, Masakazu Yamamoto, Itaru Endo
{"title":"腹腔镜与开放式肝切除术治疗左肝细胞癌的手术结果:使用回顾性日本和韩国个体患者数据的倾向评分分析。","authors":"Masaki Kaibori, Kengo Yoshii, Yuzo Umeda, Takahito Yagi, Takehiro Okabayashi, Kenta Sui, Akira Mori, Yuhei Hamaguchi, Kiyoshi Kajiyama, Daisuke Hokuto, Kazuteru Monden, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Yoriko Nomura, Kan Toriguchi, Jong Man Kim, Gi Hong Choi, Je Ho Ryu, Yangseok Koh, Koo Jeong Kang, Young Kyoung You, Kwang-Sik Chun, Young Seok Han, Chan Woo Cho, Young Il Choi, Dong-Sik Kim, Jae Do Yang, Keita Mori, Atsushi Hiraoka, Hiroki Yamaue, Masafumi Nakamura, Masakazu Yamamoto, Itaru Endo","doi":"10.1159/000527294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare the prognostic impact of laparoscopic left hepatectomy (LLH) with that of open left hepatectomy (OLH) on patient survival after resection of left hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among the 953 patients who received initial treatment for primary HCC that was resectable by either LLH or OLH from 2013 to 2017 in Japan and Korea, 146 patients underwent LLH and 807 underwent OLH. The inverse probability of treatment weighting approach based on propensity scoring was used to address the potential selection bias inherent in the recurrence and survival outcomes between the LLH and OLH groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The occurrence rate of postoperative complications and hepatic decompensation was significantly lower in the LLH group than in the OLH group. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was better in the LLH group than in the OLH group (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.71; <i>p</i> = 0.029), whereas overall survival (OS) was not significantly different. Subgroup analyses of RFS and OS revealed an almost consistent trend in favor of LLH over OLH. In patients with tumor sizes of ≥4.0 cm or those with single tumors, both RFS and OS were significantly better in the LLH group than in the OLH group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLH decreases the risk of tumor recurrence and improves OS in patients with primary HCC located in the left liver.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"12 1","pages":"32-43"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/af/e1/lic-0012-0032.PMC9982339.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Hepatectomy for Left Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Propensity Score Analyses Using Retrospective Japanese and Korean Individual Patient Data.\",\"authors\":\"Masaki Kaibori, Kengo Yoshii, Yuzo Umeda, Takahito Yagi, Takehiro Okabayashi, Kenta Sui, Akira Mori, Yuhei Hamaguchi, Kiyoshi Kajiyama, Daisuke Hokuto, Kazuteru Monden, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Yoriko Nomura, Kan Toriguchi, Jong Man Kim, Gi Hong Choi, Je Ho Ryu, Yangseok Koh, Koo Jeong Kang, Young Kyoung You, Kwang-Sik Chun, Young Seok Han, Chan Woo Cho, Young Il Choi, Dong-Sik Kim, Jae Do Yang, Keita Mori, Atsushi Hiraoka, Hiroki Yamaue, Masafumi Nakamura, Masakazu Yamamoto, Itaru Endo\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000527294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare the prognostic impact of laparoscopic left hepatectomy (LLH) with that of open left hepatectomy (OLH) on patient survival after resection of left hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among the 953 patients who received initial treatment for primary HCC that was resectable by either LLH or OLH from 2013 to 2017 in Japan and Korea, 146 patients underwent LLH and 807 underwent OLH. The inverse probability of treatment weighting approach based on propensity scoring was used to address the potential selection bias inherent in the recurrence and survival outcomes between the LLH and OLH groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The occurrence rate of postoperative complications and hepatic decompensation was significantly lower in the LLH group than in the OLH group. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was better in the LLH group than in the OLH group (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.71; <i>p</i> = 0.029), whereas overall survival (OS) was not significantly different. Subgroup analyses of RFS and OS revealed an almost consistent trend in favor of LLH over OLH. In patients with tumor sizes of ≥4.0 cm or those with single tumors, both RFS and OS were significantly better in the LLH group than in the OLH group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLH decreases the risk of tumor recurrence and improves OS in patients with primary HCC located in the left liver.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Liver Cancer\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"32-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/af/e1/lic-0012-0032.PMC9982339.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Liver Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527294\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527294","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Hepatectomy for Left Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Propensity Score Analyses Using Retrospective Japanese and Korean Individual Patient Data.
Introduction: This study aimed to compare the prognostic impact of laparoscopic left hepatectomy (LLH) with that of open left hepatectomy (OLH) on patient survival after resection of left hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods: Among the 953 patients who received initial treatment for primary HCC that was resectable by either LLH or OLH from 2013 to 2017 in Japan and Korea, 146 patients underwent LLH and 807 underwent OLH. The inverse probability of treatment weighting approach based on propensity scoring was used to address the potential selection bias inherent in the recurrence and survival outcomes between the LLH and OLH groups.
Results: The occurrence rate of postoperative complications and hepatic decompensation was significantly lower in the LLH group than in the OLH group. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was better in the LLH group than in the OLH group (hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.71; p = 0.029), whereas overall survival (OS) was not significantly different. Subgroup analyses of RFS and OS revealed an almost consistent trend in favor of LLH over OLH. In patients with tumor sizes of ≥4.0 cm or those with single tumors, both RFS and OS were significantly better in the LLH group than in the OLH group.
Conclusions: LLH decreases the risk of tumor recurrence and improves OS in patients with primary HCC located in the left liver.
期刊介绍:
Liver Cancer is a journal that serves the international community of researchers and clinicians by providing a platform for research results related to the causes, mechanisms, and therapy of liver cancer. It focuses on molecular carcinogenesis, prevention, surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment, including molecular targeted therapy. The journal publishes clinical and translational research in the field of liver cancer in both humans and experimental models. It publishes original and review articles and has an Impact Factor of 13.8. The journal is indexed and abstracted in various platforms including PubMed, PubMed Central, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, Google Scholar, DOAJ, Chemical Abstracts Service, Scopus, Embase, Pathway Studio, and WorldCat.