平面碘化钠和碲化镉锌照相机多重采集扫描左心室射血分数:与二维超声心动图的比较。

Gouri Kumar Das, Chen Siew Ng, Mahayuddin Abdul Manap
{"title":"平面碘化钠和碲化镉锌照相机多重采集扫描左心室射血分数:与二维超声心动图的比较。","authors":"Gouri Kumar Das,&nbsp;Chen Siew Ng,&nbsp;Mahayuddin Abdul Manap","doi":"10.22038/AOJNMB.2022.60392.1424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was undertaken to compare the correlation and agreement between Modified Simpson's method two-dimensional-echocardio-graphy (2D-echo) and rest multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) using both planar sodium iodide (pNaI) and cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) cameras to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and nine breast cancer patients monitored for cardiotoxicity underwent 2D-echo, followed by pNaI and CZT MUGA scans on the same day. LVEF for CZT camera was processed using both automatic and manual processing methods, thus yielding four methods for the LVEF analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant correlation (p<0.01) was seen among all four methods, with varied correlation strengths. Moderate correlation was seen between 2D-echo and both pNaI (r=0.56) and CZT cameras (automatic r=0.54, manual r=0.56). Strong correlation was registered between pNaI and CZT camera (automatic r=0.72, manual r=0.71). Bland-Altman limits of agreement among the three scans were wide and suboptimal. The widest limits were -21.1 to +16.2 (37%) between 2D-echo and CZT auto-processing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Any one of the modalities can be used to measure LVEF, however, their results should not be used interchangeably. The same method of measurement is advised for serial scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":8503,"journal":{"name":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left ventricular ejection fraction by multigated acquisition scan using planar sodium iodide and cadmium-zinc-telluride cameras: a comparison with two-dimensional echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Gouri Kumar Das,&nbsp;Chen Siew Ng,&nbsp;Mahayuddin Abdul Manap\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/AOJNMB.2022.60392.1424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study was undertaken to compare the correlation and agreement between Modified Simpson's method two-dimensional-echocardio-graphy (2D-echo) and rest multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) using both planar sodium iodide (pNaI) and cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) cameras to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and nine breast cancer patients monitored for cardiotoxicity underwent 2D-echo, followed by pNaI and CZT MUGA scans on the same day. LVEF for CZT camera was processed using both automatic and manual processing methods, thus yielding four methods for the LVEF analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant correlation (p<0.01) was seen among all four methods, with varied correlation strengths. Moderate correlation was seen between 2D-echo and both pNaI (r=0.56) and CZT cameras (automatic r=0.54, manual r=0.56). Strong correlation was registered between pNaI and CZT camera (automatic r=0.72, manual r=0.71). Bland-Altman limits of agreement among the three scans were wide and suboptimal. The widest limits were -21.1 to +16.2 (37%) between 2D-echo and CZT auto-processing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Any one of the modalities can be used to measure LVEF, however, their results should not be used interchangeably. The same method of measurement is advised for serial scans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803617/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2022.60392.1424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2022.60392.1424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较改良辛普森法二维超声心动图(2D-echo)与静止多路采集扫描(MUGA)测量左室射血分数(LVEF)的相关性和一致性,MUGA采用平面碘化钠(pNaI)和碲化镉锌(CZT)相机测量左室射血分数(LVEF)。方法:109例有心脏毒性监测的乳腺癌患者,当日行二维超声扫描,随后行pNaI和CZT MUGA扫描。对CZT相机的LVEF进行了自动处理和人工处理两种方法的处理,得到了四种LVEF分析方法。结论:任何一种方法都可以用来测量LVEF,但它们的结果不应该互换使用。对于串行扫描,建议采用相同的测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Left ventricular ejection fraction by multigated acquisition scan using planar sodium iodide and cadmium-zinc-telluride cameras: a comparison with two-dimensional echocardiography.

Objectives: This study was undertaken to compare the correlation and agreement between Modified Simpson's method two-dimensional-echocardio-graphy (2D-echo) and rest multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) using both planar sodium iodide (pNaI) and cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) cameras to measure left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Methods: One hundred and nine breast cancer patients monitored for cardiotoxicity underwent 2D-echo, followed by pNaI and CZT MUGA scans on the same day. LVEF for CZT camera was processed using both automatic and manual processing methods, thus yielding four methods for the LVEF analysis.

Results: Significant correlation (p<0.01) was seen among all four methods, with varied correlation strengths. Moderate correlation was seen between 2D-echo and both pNaI (r=0.56) and CZT cameras (automatic r=0.54, manual r=0.56). Strong correlation was registered between pNaI and CZT camera (automatic r=0.72, manual r=0.71). Bland-Altman limits of agreement among the three scans were wide and suboptimal. The widest limits were -21.1 to +16.2 (37%) between 2D-echo and CZT auto-processing.

Conclusion: Any one of the modalities can be used to measure LVEF, however, their results should not be used interchangeably. The same method of measurement is advised for serial scans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
18F-FDG PET/CT imaging of IgG4-producing MALT lymphoma with multiple site involvement. 99mTc-Sn-colloid SPECT/CT in thoracic splenosis after esophageal cancer surgery. A practical method for assessing quantitative scanner accuracy with long-lived radionuclides: The ARTnet insert. Assessment of awareness and knowledge regarding nuclear medicine and appropriate use of Nuclear medicine modalities, among medical students and faculty members in two academic medical institutes in North India: A Cross sectional Study. Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging in detection of invasive ductal breast carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1