J. Neudecker, T. Junghans, S. Ziemer, W. Raue, W. Schwenk M.D.
{"title":"取样技术对腹膜纤溶活性测定的影响","authors":"J. Neudecker, T. Junghans, S. Ziemer, W. Raue, W. Schwenk M.D.","doi":"10.1002/ejs.6161681113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Objective:</i> To establish the influence of the peritoneal sampling technique on the measurement of fibrinolytic capacity.</p><p><i>Design:</i> Clinical study.</p><p><i>Setting:</i> University hospital, Germany.</p><p><i>Subjects:</i> 40 peritoneal biopsy specimens were taken from 10 patients who were having elective colorectal resections.</p><p><i>Interventions:</i> Peritoneal biopsy specimens were taken either with a biopsy punch (<i>n</i> = 20) or manually with forceps and scissors (<i>n</i> = 20).</p><p><i>Main outcome measures:</i> Extent of agreement in fibrinolytic activities between specimens taken with biopsy punch and manually. Major endpoint—peritoneal tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) activity. Minor endpoints—peritoneal tissue plasminogen activator concentration, and concentration and activity of plasminogen activator inhibitior type 1 (PAI-1).</p><p><i>Results:</i> Intra-assay agreement and the extent of agreement between the groups were evaluated by the method of Bland and Altman. Correlation of repeated measurements of t-PA and PAI-1 concentrations and activities from the same sample using the same ELISA kit was high (<i>r</i> = 0.93–0.99, <i>p</i> < 0.01). t-PA activities and concentrations between the groups correlated poorly (<i>r</i> = 0.60 and 0.66, <i>p</i> < 0.01) while no correlation at all was seen for PAI-1 concentration and activity between the groups (<i>r</i> = 0.6 and 0.1, <i>p</i> = 0.2 and 0.9). The mean differences between the groups ranged from −27% to −4.8%.</p><p><i>Conclusion:</i> The sampling technique considerably affects the measurement of peritoneal fibrinolytic activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":100508,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Surgery","volume":"168 11","pages":"635-640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ejs.6161681113","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of the sampling technique on the measurement of peritoneal fibrinolytic activity\",\"authors\":\"J. Neudecker, T. Junghans, S. Ziemer, W. Raue, W. Schwenk M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejs.6161681113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Objective:</i> To establish the influence of the peritoneal sampling technique on the measurement of fibrinolytic capacity.</p><p><i>Design:</i> Clinical study.</p><p><i>Setting:</i> University hospital, Germany.</p><p><i>Subjects:</i> 40 peritoneal biopsy specimens were taken from 10 patients who were having elective colorectal resections.</p><p><i>Interventions:</i> Peritoneal biopsy specimens were taken either with a biopsy punch (<i>n</i> = 20) or manually with forceps and scissors (<i>n</i> = 20).</p><p><i>Main outcome measures:</i> Extent of agreement in fibrinolytic activities between specimens taken with biopsy punch and manually. Major endpoint—peritoneal tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) activity. Minor endpoints—peritoneal tissue plasminogen activator concentration, and concentration and activity of plasminogen activator inhibitior type 1 (PAI-1).</p><p><i>Results:</i> Intra-assay agreement and the extent of agreement between the groups were evaluated by the method of Bland and Altman. Correlation of repeated measurements of t-PA and PAI-1 concentrations and activities from the same sample using the same ELISA kit was high (<i>r</i> = 0.93–0.99, <i>p</i> < 0.01). t-PA activities and concentrations between the groups correlated poorly (<i>r</i> = 0.60 and 0.66, <i>p</i> < 0.01) while no correlation at all was seen for PAI-1 concentration and activity between the groups (<i>r</i> = 0.6 and 0.1, <i>p</i> = 0.2 and 0.9). The mean differences between the groups ranged from −27% to −4.8%.</p><p><i>Conclusion:</i> The sampling technique considerably affects the measurement of peritoneal fibrinolytic activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"168 11\",\"pages\":\"635-640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ejs.6161681113\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejs.6161681113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejs.6161681113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of the sampling technique on the measurement of peritoneal fibrinolytic activity
Objective: To establish the influence of the peritoneal sampling technique on the measurement of fibrinolytic capacity.
Design: Clinical study.
Setting: University hospital, Germany.
Subjects: 40 peritoneal biopsy specimens were taken from 10 patients who were having elective colorectal resections.
Interventions: Peritoneal biopsy specimens were taken either with a biopsy punch (n = 20) or manually with forceps and scissors (n = 20).
Main outcome measures: Extent of agreement in fibrinolytic activities between specimens taken with biopsy punch and manually. Major endpoint—peritoneal tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) activity. Minor endpoints—peritoneal tissue plasminogen activator concentration, and concentration and activity of plasminogen activator inhibitior type 1 (PAI-1).
Results: Intra-assay agreement and the extent of agreement between the groups were evaluated by the method of Bland and Altman. Correlation of repeated measurements of t-PA and PAI-1 concentrations and activities from the same sample using the same ELISA kit was high (r = 0.93–0.99, p < 0.01). t-PA activities and concentrations between the groups correlated poorly (r = 0.60 and 0.66, p < 0.01) while no correlation at all was seen for PAI-1 concentration and activity between the groups (r = 0.6 and 0.1, p = 0.2 and 0.9). The mean differences between the groups ranged from −27% to −4.8%.
Conclusion: The sampling technique considerably affects the measurement of peritoneal fibrinolytic activity.