组织内部网络中的信息状态:知识共享和结构漏洞的作用

Cristiano de Oliveira Maciel, Carlos Eduardo Liparotti Chaves
{"title":"组织内部网络中的信息状态:知识共享和结构漏洞的作用","authors":"Cristiano de Oliveira Maciel,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo Liparotti Chaves","doi":"10.1016/j.rausp.2016.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate to what extent the similarity of informational status of intra-organizational actors relates to behavioral (knowledge sharing) and structural antecedents (structural holes) in a knowledge-intensive organization. The study was operationalized through the analysis of 462 dyads (22<!--> <!-->*<!--> <!-->(22<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->1)) that comprise social relationships in a development organization of technology for telemedicine. The results indicate that the similarity of independent variables was associated to similarity in informational status, but there is no interaction between them. It is concluded that the equal status can be achieved even when two actors have different bases for its construction, whether through knowledge sharing practices or through structural holes. This conclusion relativizes what is called Matthew effect in status research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":30471,"journal":{"name":"RAUSP Revista de Administracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo","volume":"52 2","pages":"Pages 189-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.12.008","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informational status in intra-organizational networks: The role of knowledge sharing and structural holes\",\"authors\":\"Cristiano de Oliveira Maciel,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo Liparotti Chaves\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rausp.2016.12.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate to what extent the similarity of informational status of intra-organizational actors relates to behavioral (knowledge sharing) and structural antecedents (structural holes) in a knowledge-intensive organization. The study was operationalized through the analysis of 462 dyads (22<!--> <!-->*<!--> <!-->(22<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->1)) that comprise social relationships in a development organization of technology for telemedicine. The results indicate that the similarity of independent variables was associated to similarity in informational status, but there is no interaction between them. It is concluded that the equal status can be achieved even when two actors have different bases for its construction, whether through knowledge sharing practices or through structural holes. This conclusion relativizes what is called Matthew effect in status research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RAUSP Revista de Administracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo\",\"volume\":\"52 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 189-198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.12.008\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RAUSP Revista de Administracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0080210716308330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAUSP Revista de Administracao da Universidade de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0080210716308330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本研究的目的是评估在知识密集型组织中,组织内行为者信息状态的相似性与行为(知识共享)和结构前因(结构漏洞)之间的关系。该研究通过分析462对(22 *(22−1))构成远程医疗技术开发组织中的社会关系来实施。结果表明,自变量的相似性与信息状态的相似性相关,但两者之间不存在交互作用。结果表明,无论是通过知识共享实践,还是通过结构漏洞,即使两个行动者具有不同的构建基础,也可以实现平等地位。这一结论相对于地位研究中所谓的马太效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Informational status in intra-organizational networks: The role of knowledge sharing and structural holes

The aim of this study was to evaluate to what extent the similarity of informational status of intra-organizational actors relates to behavioral (knowledge sharing) and structural antecedents (structural holes) in a knowledge-intensive organization. The study was operationalized through the analysis of 462 dyads (22 * (22  1)) that comprise social relationships in a development organization of technology for telemedicine. The results indicate that the similarity of independent variables was associated to similarity in informational status, but there is no interaction between them. It is concluded that the equal status can be achieved even when two actors have different bases for its construction, whether through knowledge sharing practices or through structural holes. This conclusion relativizes what is called Matthew effect in status research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial Formal and relational contracts between organizations: proposal of a model for analysis of the transactional and governance structure characteristics of comparative cases The use of dynamic capabilities to boost innovation in a Brazilian Chemical Company Investigating the deal making failure in M&A: deal makers’ perspective in Brazil What motivates money donation? A study on external motivators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1