在一个新兴的基于混合能力的跨学科项目中,教师角色的演变

Iryna Ashby, Secil Caskurlu, Marisa Exter
{"title":"在一个新兴的基于混合能力的跨学科项目中,教师角色的演变","authors":"Iryna Ashby,&nbsp;Secil Caskurlu,&nbsp;Marisa Exter","doi":"10.1002/cbe2.1059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Faculty is inseparable from the design and implementation of competency-based programs. Yet prior research on competency-based education (CBE) has mainly focused on program design and implementation, paying less attention to the faculty roles and perception of their involvement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>This paper explores faculty perceptions of their own roles relating to the design and the pilot semester implementation of a new competency-based transdisciplinary program at a large Midwest research-intensive university.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using a phenomenological approach, we conducted semistructured interviews with faculty involved in the program design and implementation of the pilot semester in this program (<i>n</i> = 7) to gain an understanding of the varied demands and expectations, as well as their perceptions of such roles in the context of the program.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings showed a variety of faculty functions pertaining to their roles within our CBE environment. The faculty interviewed also tended to be actively engaged in terms of student onboarding, motivation, and encouragement, particularly earlier in the semester. Facilitation of students’ learning and competency attainment at the prescribed level of mastery led to the need for ongoing review and feedback of students’ work, and a higher workload than a traditional course. Yet, the faculty had positive responses to the program and their work, which in part may relate to their early buy-in into the program as part of their collaboration on the program design.</p>\n \n <p>Implications, limitations, and future research are discussed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101234,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1059","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolving roles of faculty at an emerging hybrid competency-based transdisciplinary program\",\"authors\":\"Iryna Ashby,&nbsp;Secil Caskurlu,&nbsp;Marisa Exter\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cbe2.1059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Faculty is inseparable from the design and implementation of competency-based programs. Yet prior research on competency-based education (CBE) has mainly focused on program design and implementation, paying less attention to the faculty roles and perception of their involvement.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>This paper explores faculty perceptions of their own roles relating to the design and the pilot semester implementation of a new competency-based transdisciplinary program at a large Midwest research-intensive university.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using a phenomenological approach, we conducted semistructured interviews with faculty involved in the program design and implementation of the pilot semester in this program (<i>n</i> = 7) to gain an understanding of the varied demands and expectations, as well as their perceptions of such roles in the context of the program.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our findings showed a variety of faculty functions pertaining to their roles within our CBE environment. The faculty interviewed also tended to be actively engaged in terms of student onboarding, motivation, and encouragement, particularly earlier in the semester. Facilitation of students’ learning and competency attainment at the prescribed level of mastery led to the need for ongoing review and feedback of students’ work, and a higher workload than a traditional course. Yet, the faculty had positive responses to the program and their work, which in part may relate to their early buy-in into the program as part of their collaboration on the program design.</p>\\n \\n <p>Implications, limitations, and future research are discussed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1059\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

教师离不开基于能力的课程的设计和实施。然而,以往关于能力本位教育的研究主要集中在课程设计和实施上,而对教师的角色及其参与的感知关注较少。本文探讨了中西部一所大型研究型大学在设计和试点学期实施新的基于能力的跨学科项目时,教师对自己角色的看法。方法:采用现象学方法,我们对参与该计划试点学期的计划设计和实施的教师(n = 7)进行了半结构化访谈,以了解不同的需求和期望,以及他们对该计划背景下这些角色的看法。结果:我们的研究结果表明,在我们的CBE环境中,教师的各种功能与其角色有关。接受采访的教师也倾向于积极参与学生的入职、激励和鼓励,尤其是在学期早期。为了促进学生在规定的掌握水平上的学习和能力的实现,需要对学生的工作进行持续的审查和反馈,并且比传统课程的工作量更大。然而,教师们对这个项目和他们的工作有积极的反应,这在一定程度上可能与他们早期参与这个项目有关,作为他们在项目设计上合作的一部分。讨论了影响、局限性和未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evolving roles of faculty at an emerging hybrid competency-based transdisciplinary program

Background

Faculty is inseparable from the design and implementation of competency-based programs. Yet prior research on competency-based education (CBE) has mainly focused on program design and implementation, paying less attention to the faculty roles and perception of their involvement.

Aims

This paper explores faculty perceptions of their own roles relating to the design and the pilot semester implementation of a new competency-based transdisciplinary program at a large Midwest research-intensive university.

Methods

Using a phenomenological approach, we conducted semistructured interviews with faculty involved in the program design and implementation of the pilot semester in this program (n = 7) to gain an understanding of the varied demands and expectations, as well as their perceptions of such roles in the context of the program.

Results

Our findings showed a variety of faculty functions pertaining to their roles within our CBE environment. The faculty interviewed also tended to be actively engaged in terms of student onboarding, motivation, and encouragement, particularly earlier in the semester. Facilitation of students’ learning and competency attainment at the prescribed level of mastery led to the need for ongoing review and feedback of students’ work, and a higher workload than a traditional course. Yet, the faculty had positive responses to the program and their work, which in part may relate to their early buy-in into the program as part of their collaboration on the program design.

Implications, limitations, and future research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Exploring secondary teachers' perspectives on implementing competency-based education The impact of student recognition of excellence to student outcome in a competency-based educational model Issue Information JCBE editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1