出苗前除草剂对百慕草春季死斑恢复的影响

L. L. Beck, T. Cooper, A. J. Hephner, C. M. Straw, G. M. Henry
{"title":"出苗前除草剂对百慕草春季死斑恢复的影响","authors":"L. L. Beck,&nbsp;T. Cooper,&nbsp;A. J. Hephner,&nbsp;C. M. Straw,&nbsp;G. M. Henry","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field experiments were conducted in Texas to examine the recovery of a bermudagrass [<i>Cynodon dactylon</i> × <i>C. transvaalensis</i> (L.) Pers.] fairway from spring dead spot (SDS) disease following preemergence (PRE) herbicide applications. In 2011 and 2012 bermudagrass recovery from SDS in the non-treated check plots (46 and 59%, respectively) was similar to bermudagrass recovery in response to oxadiazon at 3.4 kg/ha (55 and 57%, respectively) 14 weeks after treatment (WAT). Pendimethalin at 2.5 kg/ha resulted in 33 to 38% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2011, oryzalin (1.68 kg/ha), dithiopyr (0.56 kg/ha), prodiamine (0.73 kg/ha), and dimethenamid (1.68 kg/ha) applications resulted in 21 to 25% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2012, bermudagrass exhibited similar recovery in response to prodiamine and oryzalin (24 and 26%, respectively), while response to dithiopyr and dimethenamid was 33 and 34%, respectively, 14 WAT. Bermudagrass exhibited the least amount of recovery (13 to 14%) in response to indaziflam at 0.035 kg/ha, regardless of year. Oxadiazon can be safely used as a PRE option when bermudagrass is recovering from SDS, while the use of oryzalin, prodiamine, dithiopyr, dimethenamid, pendimethalin, and indaziflam may limit recovery and further contribute to a weakened turfgrass system.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Preemergence Herbicides on the Recovery of Bermudagrass from Spring Dead Spot\",\"authors\":\"L. L. Beck,&nbsp;T. Cooper,&nbsp;A. J. Hephner,&nbsp;C. M. Straw,&nbsp;G. M. Henry\",\"doi\":\"10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Field experiments were conducted in Texas to examine the recovery of a bermudagrass [<i>Cynodon dactylon</i> × <i>C. transvaalensis</i> (L.) Pers.] fairway from spring dead spot (SDS) disease following preemergence (PRE) herbicide applications. In 2011 and 2012 bermudagrass recovery from SDS in the non-treated check plots (46 and 59%, respectively) was similar to bermudagrass recovery in response to oxadiazon at 3.4 kg/ha (55 and 57%, respectively) 14 weeks after treatment (WAT). Pendimethalin at 2.5 kg/ha resulted in 33 to 38% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2011, oryzalin (1.68 kg/ha), dithiopyr (0.56 kg/ha), prodiamine (0.73 kg/ha), and dimethenamid (1.68 kg/ha) applications resulted in 21 to 25% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2012, bermudagrass exhibited similar recovery in response to prodiamine and oryzalin (24 and 26%, respectively), while response to dithiopyr and dimethenamid was 33 and 34%, respectively, 14 WAT. Bermudagrass exhibited the least amount of recovery (13 to 14%) in response to indaziflam at 0.035 kg/ha, regardless of year. Oxadiazon can be safely used as a PRE option when bermudagrass is recovering from SDS, while the use of oryzalin, prodiamine, dithiopyr, dimethenamid, pendimethalin, and indaziflam may limit recovery and further contribute to a weakened turfgrass system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Turfgrass Science\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Turfgrass Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Turfgrass Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在德克萨斯州进行了实地试验,研究了百慕大草(Cynodon dactylon × C. transvaalensis)的恢复情况。珀耳斯。在出现前(PRE)除草剂施用后,球道免受春季死斑(SDS)病的影响。2011年和2012年,未处理的对照区SDS的百德草恢复率(分别为46%和59%)与处理后14周(WAT) 3.4 kg/ha(分别为55%和57%)的百德草恢复率相似。施用2.5 kg/ha的二甲甲烷可使SDS - 14 WAT的百慕大草回收率达到33% ~ 38%。2011年,在SDS - 14 WAT中,使用米草灵(1.68公斤/公顷)、双硫吡虫啉(0.56公斤/公顷)、丙二胺(0.73公斤/公顷)和二甲氰胺(1.68公斤/公顷),百慕草的回收率为21%至25%。2012年,百米草对丙二胺和谷氨酰胺的应答率相似(分别为24%和26%),而对硫吡菌酯和二甲胺的应答率分别为33%和34% (14 WAT)。在0.035 kg/ha的indaziflam处理下,百慕大草的回收率最低(13% ~ 14%),与年份无关。当百慕大草从SDS中恢复时,可以安全地使用恶二唑作为PRE的选择,而使用米扎林、丙二胺、双硫吡醇、二甲脒、苯二甲基灵和吲唑氟可能会限制恢复,并进一步导致草坪草系统的削弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Preemergence Herbicides on the Recovery of Bermudagrass from Spring Dead Spot

Field experiments were conducted in Texas to examine the recovery of a bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon × C. transvaalensis (L.) Pers.] fairway from spring dead spot (SDS) disease following preemergence (PRE) herbicide applications. In 2011 and 2012 bermudagrass recovery from SDS in the non-treated check plots (46 and 59%, respectively) was similar to bermudagrass recovery in response to oxadiazon at 3.4 kg/ha (55 and 57%, respectively) 14 weeks after treatment (WAT). Pendimethalin at 2.5 kg/ha resulted in 33 to 38% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2011, oryzalin (1.68 kg/ha), dithiopyr (0.56 kg/ha), prodiamine (0.73 kg/ha), and dimethenamid (1.68 kg/ha) applications resulted in 21 to 25% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2012, bermudagrass exhibited similar recovery in response to prodiamine and oryzalin (24 and 26%, respectively), while response to dithiopyr and dimethenamid was 33 and 34%, respectively, 14 WAT. Bermudagrass exhibited the least amount of recovery (13 to 14%) in response to indaziflam at 0.035 kg/ha, regardless of year. Oxadiazon can be safely used as a PRE option when bermudagrass is recovering from SDS, while the use of oryzalin, prodiamine, dithiopyr, dimethenamid, pendimethalin, and indaziflam may limit recovery and further contribute to a weakened turfgrass system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Antimicrobial Compounds on Etiolation Caused by Xanthomonas translucens and on Turf Quality of Creeping Bentgrass Putting-Green Turf Applicator and Primo Effects on the Persistence of Painted Golf Course Water Hazard and Out-of-Bounds Lines on Bermudagrass Cultivation Effects on Organic Matter Concentration and Infiltration Rates of Two Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) Putting Greens Amicarbazone Application Timing Influences Overseeded Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Safety and Annual Bluegrass (Poa annua L.) Control Turfgrass Winterkill Observations from the Great Lakes Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1