为绿色屋顶系统构建根区

P. Nektarios, N. Ntoulas, G. Kotopoulis, E. Nydrioti, D. Barela, T. Kapsali, G. Amountzias, I. Kokkinou, A.T. Paraskevopoulou
{"title":"为绿色屋顶系统构建根区","authors":"P. Nektarios,&nbsp;N. Ntoulas,&nbsp;G. Kotopoulis,&nbsp;E. Nydrioti,&nbsp;D. Barela,&nbsp;T. Kapsali,&nbsp;G. Amountzias,&nbsp;I. Kokkinou,&nbsp;A.T. Paraskevopoulou","doi":"10.2134/ATS-2013-0021BC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Green roofs are considered among the best technological solutions for greening existing urban landscapes characterized by the lack of open and green spaces. The selection of the appropriate rootzone (vegetation layer) is of major importance since it needs to comply with several criteria such as: (a) providing sustainable growth of the selected plant material; (b) exercising limited weight on the building framework; (c) providing adequate anchorage depending on the type of the green roof (extensive-intensive); (d) consisting of environmentally friendly materials; (e) prohibiting any environmental hazards such as nutrient or agrochemical leaching; (f) quickly draining excess water yet retaining increased moisture.</p><p>Up to date the green roof industry has mainly been following the German guidelines (FLL) for green roofs while other countries have completely or partially accepted them. However the FLL guidelines have been formulated for northern climates and demand alterations for being applicable to semi-arid or Mediterranean type climatic conditions. In addition the formulaic categorization of green roofs as extensive, semi-intensive and intensive has recently received criticisms in an effort to proceed in an adaptive green roof approach that would depend on the local conditions of each urban environment.</p><p>Rootzone type, substrate depth and plant species selection are the most important factors contributing to the success and sustainability of a green roof system. The green roof rootzones are mainly constituted by inorganic and at a much lesser degree by organic materials. The most commonly utilized inorganic materials as rootzone constituents are pumice, crashed tile or brick, expanded shale or clay, sand, and zeolite whereas for the organic materials peat and composts.</p><p>There is a worldwide research that has provided significant information concerning the effects of different types of green roof rootzones combined with different substrate depths and with various plant species. Several plant species with C<sub>3</sub>, C<sub>4</sub> or CAM metabolic pathways have been evaluated and the conditions of their sustainable growth have been determined. It has been acknowledged that rootzone depth has a significant role in green roof flora sustainability since in most cases increasing the rootzone depth has resulted in increasing plant survival and sustainability and contributed to water inputs reduction. Conversely plants have differentiated reactions in regards to rootzone type since they seem to have different inherited preferences for inorganic constituents, organic content and in several cases their behavior has been altered between growing periods (water stressed and unstressed conditions). So far the effort has been focused on utilizing native and endemic plant species to reintroduce the lost flora and fauna in contemporary cities. However there is also an effort to increase the selection palette of plant species by utilizing an adaptive method for green roof construction. In the adaptive approach several plant species categories could be utilized such as turfgrasses, exotic species and other plant species with minimal inputs of natural resources such as water.</p><p>The interest of future works on green roof rootzones is to define new materials with a small CO<sub>2</sub> footprint, preferably recycled to be utilized as constituents. In addition the determination of the necessary inputs of natural resources, especially water in the adaptive green roof approach, is imperative in order to support and facilitate decision making processes throughout the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2134/ATS-2013-0021BC","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructed Rootzones for Green Roof Systems\",\"authors\":\"P. Nektarios,&nbsp;N. Ntoulas,&nbsp;G. Kotopoulis,&nbsp;E. Nydrioti,&nbsp;D. Barela,&nbsp;T. Kapsali,&nbsp;G. Amountzias,&nbsp;I. Kokkinou,&nbsp;A.T. Paraskevopoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.2134/ATS-2013-0021BC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Green roofs are considered among the best technological solutions for greening existing urban landscapes characterized by the lack of open and green spaces. The selection of the appropriate rootzone (vegetation layer) is of major importance since it needs to comply with several criteria such as: (a) providing sustainable growth of the selected plant material; (b) exercising limited weight on the building framework; (c) providing adequate anchorage depending on the type of the green roof (extensive-intensive); (d) consisting of environmentally friendly materials; (e) prohibiting any environmental hazards such as nutrient or agrochemical leaching; (f) quickly draining excess water yet retaining increased moisture.</p><p>Up to date the green roof industry has mainly been following the German guidelines (FLL) for green roofs while other countries have completely or partially accepted them. However the FLL guidelines have been formulated for northern climates and demand alterations for being applicable to semi-arid or Mediterranean type climatic conditions. In addition the formulaic categorization of green roofs as extensive, semi-intensive and intensive has recently received criticisms in an effort to proceed in an adaptive green roof approach that would depend on the local conditions of each urban environment.</p><p>Rootzone type, substrate depth and plant species selection are the most important factors contributing to the success and sustainability of a green roof system. The green roof rootzones are mainly constituted by inorganic and at a much lesser degree by organic materials. The most commonly utilized inorganic materials as rootzone constituents are pumice, crashed tile or brick, expanded shale or clay, sand, and zeolite whereas for the organic materials peat and composts.</p><p>There is a worldwide research that has provided significant information concerning the effects of different types of green roof rootzones combined with different substrate depths and with various plant species. Several plant species with C<sub>3</sub>, C<sub>4</sub> or CAM metabolic pathways have been evaluated and the conditions of their sustainable growth have been determined. It has been acknowledged that rootzone depth has a significant role in green roof flora sustainability since in most cases increasing the rootzone depth has resulted in increasing plant survival and sustainability and contributed to water inputs reduction. Conversely plants have differentiated reactions in regards to rootzone type since they seem to have different inherited preferences for inorganic constituents, organic content and in several cases their behavior has been altered between growing periods (water stressed and unstressed conditions). So far the effort has been focused on utilizing native and endemic plant species to reintroduce the lost flora and fauna in contemporary cities. However there is also an effort to increase the selection palette of plant species by utilizing an adaptive method for green roof construction. In the adaptive approach several plant species categories could be utilized such as turfgrasses, exotic species and other plant species with minimal inputs of natural resources such as water.</p><p>The interest of future works on green roof rootzones is to define new materials with a small CO<sub>2</sub> footprint, preferably recycled to be utilized as constituents. In addition the determination of the necessary inputs of natural resources, especially water in the adaptive green roof approach, is imperative in order to support and facilitate decision making processes throughout the world.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Turfgrass Science\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2134/ATS-2013-0021BC\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Turfgrass Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/ATS-2013-0021BC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Turfgrass Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2134/ATS-2013-0021BC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

绿色屋顶被认为是绿化现有城市景观的最佳技术解决方案之一,其特点是缺乏开放和绿色空间。选择合适的根区(植被层)是非常重要的,因为它需要符合几个标准,如:(a)提供所选植物材料的可持续生长;(b)对建筑物框架施加有限的重量;(c)根据绿化屋顶的类型提供足够的锚地(粗放型);(d)由环保材料组成;(e)禁止任何环境危害,例如养分或农用化学品浸出;(f)迅速排出多余的水分,同时保持增加的水分。到目前为止,绿色屋顶行业主要遵循德国的绿色屋顶指导方针(FLL),而其他国家则完全或部分接受了这些指导方针。然而,FLL准则是针对北方气候制定的,并要求进行修改,以适用于半干旱或地中海型气候条件。此外,将绿色屋顶公式化地分类为广泛、半密集和密集的做法最近受到了批评,因为人们试图采用一种适应性的绿色屋顶方法,这种方法将取决于每个城市环境的当地条件。根区类型、基质深度和植物种类的选择是影响绿色屋顶系统成功和可持续发展的最重要因素。绿色屋顶根区主要由无机材料构成,有机材料的比例要小得多。作为根区成分最常用的无机材料是浮石、碎瓦或砖、膨胀的页岩或粘土、沙子和沸石,而有机材料是泥炭和堆肥。有一项全球性的研究提供了关于不同类型的绿色屋顶根区与不同基质深度和不同植物种类相结合的影响的重要信息。对几种具有C3、C4或CAM代谢途径的植物进行了评价,并确定了其可持续生长的条件。在大多数情况下,根区深度的增加增加了植物的存活率和可持续性,并有助于减少水分投入,因此根区深度对绿色屋顶植物的可持续性具有重要作用。相反,植物在根区类型方面有不同的反应,因为它们似乎对无机成分、有机含量有不同的遗传偏好,在某些情况下,它们的行为在生长期(缺水和非缺水条件)之间发生了改变。到目前为止,这项工作的重点是利用本地和特有的植物物种来重新引入当代城市中失去的动植物。然而,也有一个努力,增加植物品种的选择面板,利用绿色屋顶施工的适应性方法。在适应性方法中,可以利用几种植物种类,如草坪草、外来物种和其他植物物种,而自然资源(如水)的投入最少。绿色屋顶根区的未来工作的兴趣是定义二氧化碳排放量小的新材料,最好是回收利用作为成分。此外,确定自然资源的必要投入,特别是适应性绿色屋顶方法中的水,对于支持和促进世界各地的决策过程至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Constructed Rootzones for Green Roof Systems

Green roofs are considered among the best technological solutions for greening existing urban landscapes characterized by the lack of open and green spaces. The selection of the appropriate rootzone (vegetation layer) is of major importance since it needs to comply with several criteria such as: (a) providing sustainable growth of the selected plant material; (b) exercising limited weight on the building framework; (c) providing adequate anchorage depending on the type of the green roof (extensive-intensive); (d) consisting of environmentally friendly materials; (e) prohibiting any environmental hazards such as nutrient or agrochemical leaching; (f) quickly draining excess water yet retaining increased moisture.

Up to date the green roof industry has mainly been following the German guidelines (FLL) for green roofs while other countries have completely or partially accepted them. However the FLL guidelines have been formulated for northern climates and demand alterations for being applicable to semi-arid or Mediterranean type climatic conditions. In addition the formulaic categorization of green roofs as extensive, semi-intensive and intensive has recently received criticisms in an effort to proceed in an adaptive green roof approach that would depend on the local conditions of each urban environment.

Rootzone type, substrate depth and plant species selection are the most important factors contributing to the success and sustainability of a green roof system. The green roof rootzones are mainly constituted by inorganic and at a much lesser degree by organic materials. The most commonly utilized inorganic materials as rootzone constituents are pumice, crashed tile or brick, expanded shale or clay, sand, and zeolite whereas for the organic materials peat and composts.

There is a worldwide research that has provided significant information concerning the effects of different types of green roof rootzones combined with different substrate depths and with various plant species. Several plant species with C3, C4 or CAM metabolic pathways have been evaluated and the conditions of their sustainable growth have been determined. It has been acknowledged that rootzone depth has a significant role in green roof flora sustainability since in most cases increasing the rootzone depth has resulted in increasing plant survival and sustainability and contributed to water inputs reduction. Conversely plants have differentiated reactions in regards to rootzone type since they seem to have different inherited preferences for inorganic constituents, organic content and in several cases their behavior has been altered between growing periods (water stressed and unstressed conditions). So far the effort has been focused on utilizing native and endemic plant species to reintroduce the lost flora and fauna in contemporary cities. However there is also an effort to increase the selection palette of plant species by utilizing an adaptive method for green roof construction. In the adaptive approach several plant species categories could be utilized such as turfgrasses, exotic species and other plant species with minimal inputs of natural resources such as water.

The interest of future works on green roof rootzones is to define new materials with a small CO2 footprint, preferably recycled to be utilized as constituents. In addition the determination of the necessary inputs of natural resources, especially water in the adaptive green roof approach, is imperative in order to support and facilitate decision making processes throughout the world.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Antimicrobial Compounds on Etiolation Caused by Xanthomonas translucens and on Turf Quality of Creeping Bentgrass Putting-Green Turf Applicator and Primo Effects on the Persistence of Painted Golf Course Water Hazard and Out-of-Bounds Lines on Bermudagrass Cultivation Effects on Organic Matter Concentration and Infiltration Rates of Two Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) Putting Greens Amicarbazone Application Timing Influences Overseeded Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Safety and Annual Bluegrass (Poa annua L.) Control Turfgrass Winterkill Observations from the Great Lakes Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1