百慕草和结缕草品种选择:第二部分:草皮恢复

Jon M. Trappe, Douglas E. Karcher, Michael D. Richardson, Aaron J. Patton
{"title":"百慕草和结缕草品种选择:第二部分:草皮恢复","authors":"Jon M. Trappe,&nbsp;Douglas E. Karcher,&nbsp;Michael D. Richardson,&nbsp;Aaron J. Patton","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0630-02-RS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Golfers commonly remove turf and soil when swinging a golf club causing a divot in the turf. Divot recovery is an important factor that should be considered when selecting a species or cultivar for use on golf course tees or fairways. There are few reports directly comparing the divot recovery among bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon</i> spp. Rich.) and zoysiagrass (<i>Zoysia</i> spp. Willd.) cultivars. Therefore, the objective of this experiment was to quantify divot recovery of several bermudagrass and zoysiagrass cultivars in a combined field experiment. Divot recovery was evaluated on four collection dates for five cultivars of bermudagrass and seven cultivars of zoysiagrass. Cultivars generally with the fastest time to 50% recovery were ‘Princess 77’ and ‘Riviera’ bermudagrass and ‘Palisades’ zoysiagrass. Generally, the cultivars with the slowest time to 50% recovery were ‘Meyer’ and ‘Zenith’ zoysiagrass. Additionally, ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass had similar divot recovery times to ‘El Toro’ and Palisades zoysiagrass. These results demonstrate that differences and similarities exist among bermudagrass and zoysiagrass cultivars for divot recovery, and golf course superintendents can use this information to better select cultivars that could improve surface playing conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bermudagrass and Zoysiagrass Cultivar Selection: Part 2, Divot Recovery\",\"authors\":\"Jon M. Trappe,&nbsp;Douglas E. Karcher,&nbsp;Michael D. Richardson,&nbsp;Aaron J. Patton\",\"doi\":\"10.1094/ATS-2011-0630-02-RS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Golfers commonly remove turf and soil when swinging a golf club causing a divot in the turf. Divot recovery is an important factor that should be considered when selecting a species or cultivar for use on golf course tees or fairways. There are few reports directly comparing the divot recovery among bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon</i> spp. Rich.) and zoysiagrass (<i>Zoysia</i> spp. Willd.) cultivars. Therefore, the objective of this experiment was to quantify divot recovery of several bermudagrass and zoysiagrass cultivars in a combined field experiment. Divot recovery was evaluated on four collection dates for five cultivars of bermudagrass and seven cultivars of zoysiagrass. Cultivars generally with the fastest time to 50% recovery were ‘Princess 77’ and ‘Riviera’ bermudagrass and ‘Palisades’ zoysiagrass. Generally, the cultivars with the slowest time to 50% recovery were ‘Meyer’ and ‘Zenith’ zoysiagrass. Additionally, ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass had similar divot recovery times to ‘El Toro’ and Palisades zoysiagrass. These results demonstrate that differences and similarities exist among bermudagrass and zoysiagrass cultivars for divot recovery, and golf course superintendents can use this information to better select cultivars that could improve surface playing conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Turfgrass Science\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Turfgrass Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/ATS-2011-0630-02-RS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Turfgrass Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/ATS-2011-0630-02-RS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

高尔夫球手在挥动高尔夫球杆时,通常会清除草皮和土壤,从而在草皮上形成草皮。草皮恢复是一个重要的因素,应考虑选择一个物种或栽培用于高尔夫球场发球台或球道。直接比较百慕大草(Cynodon spp. Rich.)和结缕草(Zoysia spp. wild .)品种间草皮恢复的报道很少。因此,本试验的目的是在田间联合试验中量化几个百慕大草和结缕草品种的草皮恢复。对5个百慕大草品种和7个结缕草品种的4个采集日期进行了草皮恢复评价。通常恢复50%最快的品种是'公主77 '和'里维埃拉'百慕大草和'帕利塞德斯'结日草。一般来说,恢复时间最慢的品种是‘Meyer’和‘Zenith’结缕草。此外,' Tifway '百慕大草的草皮恢复时间与' El Toro '和Palisades结缕草相似。这些结果表明,百慕大草和结结草在草皮恢复方面存在差异和相似之处,高尔夫球场管理者可以利用这些信息更好地选择能够改善地面比赛条件的品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bermudagrass and Zoysiagrass Cultivar Selection: Part 2, Divot Recovery

Golfers commonly remove turf and soil when swinging a golf club causing a divot in the turf. Divot recovery is an important factor that should be considered when selecting a species or cultivar for use on golf course tees or fairways. There are few reports directly comparing the divot recovery among bermudagrass (Cynodon spp. Rich.) and zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp. Willd.) cultivars. Therefore, the objective of this experiment was to quantify divot recovery of several bermudagrass and zoysiagrass cultivars in a combined field experiment. Divot recovery was evaluated on four collection dates for five cultivars of bermudagrass and seven cultivars of zoysiagrass. Cultivars generally with the fastest time to 50% recovery were ‘Princess 77’ and ‘Riviera’ bermudagrass and ‘Palisades’ zoysiagrass. Generally, the cultivars with the slowest time to 50% recovery were ‘Meyer’ and ‘Zenith’ zoysiagrass. Additionally, ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass had similar divot recovery times to ‘El Toro’ and Palisades zoysiagrass. These results demonstrate that differences and similarities exist among bermudagrass and zoysiagrass cultivars for divot recovery, and golf course superintendents can use this information to better select cultivars that could improve surface playing conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Antimicrobial Compounds on Etiolation Caused by Xanthomonas translucens and on Turf Quality of Creeping Bentgrass Putting-Green Turf Applicator and Primo Effects on the Persistence of Painted Golf Course Water Hazard and Out-of-Bounds Lines on Bermudagrass Cultivation Effects on Organic Matter Concentration and Infiltration Rates of Two Creeping Bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) Putting Greens Amicarbazone Application Timing Influences Overseeded Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) Safety and Annual Bluegrass (Poa annua L.) Control Turfgrass Winterkill Observations from the Great Lakes Region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1