适当的井距——泰国湾开发项目价值最大化的补充方法

Pitchaya Hotapavanon, Kasinee Suyacom, K. Chuachomsuk, Jiraphas Thapchim, Rutchanok Nasomsong, Metsai Chaipornkaew
{"title":"适当的井距——泰国湾开发项目价值最大化的补充方法","authors":"Pitchaya Hotapavanon, Kasinee Suyacom, K. Chuachomsuk, Jiraphas Thapchim, Rutchanok Nasomsong, Metsai Chaipornkaew","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22990-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n For The Gulf of Thailand (GoT) projects, the bulk of investment goes in drilling development wells and the financial return is depending on how much reserve is effectively tapped by those wells. To improve project economics, both optimizing the well placements to access hydrocarbon and minimizing the number of wells are required. This study shows how proper well spacing used in development well planning is defined using the understanding of reservoir connectivity ratio at a given well spacing.\n Firstly, reservoir correlation panels of wells drilled within the same trapping fault were created and the reservoir connectivity ratio at a given well spacing were collected. Hence the cross-plot between various well spacing and reservoir connectivity ratio was constructed to establish relationship. New reserves were derived by new pay from the spacing-connectivity relationship and estimated ultimate recovery per metre (EUR/m). With the estimated reserves varied by well spacing, the proper well spacing can be defined by identifying the narrowest well spacing that yield new incremental reserves above economic cut-off.\n More than 100 cross-plots from Arthit project were conducted by using the existing wells information, the results suggest that a relationship between well spacing and reservoir connectivity ratio is varying depended on trap style, fault strike, channel width & oblique angle and hydrocarbon column height. A new/share pay ratio template is now available to illustrate an expected new/share pay ratio at a given well spacing (ranged from 100 m. to 1,500 m.) in each HC pay unit and subsurface geological trend. From the result, new pay ratio is in the range of 45%-60% at the current well spacing (400 m.) of Arthit Project. Based on the economic justification of Arthit project, there is the opportunity to narrow down well spacing for being economically viable in the future.\n The optimum well spacing together with an economic viability analysis in each project could be done efficiently. Shortly, the proper given well spacing will be proactively planned for both infill and new wellhead platform. The 2021 infill projects help to validate the current model, improve the prediction function and certainly narrow down those uncertainties for future development projects.\n Development planning would benefit greatly from proper well spacing so that the optimum number of wells is known upfront so project planning could be properly managed. If tighter well spacing could be applied, more wells could be filled into existing platforms. Then the big investment on new platforms could be deferred. Moreover, this method can be also broadened to other projects where GoT development model can be applied to achieve optimum commerciality.","PeriodicalId":283978,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","volume":" 32","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Proper Well Spacings – A Supplementary Method to Maximize The Gulf of Thailand Development Project Value\",\"authors\":\"Pitchaya Hotapavanon, Kasinee Suyacom, K. Chuachomsuk, Jiraphas Thapchim, Rutchanok Nasomsong, Metsai Chaipornkaew\",\"doi\":\"10.2523/iptc-22990-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n For The Gulf of Thailand (GoT) projects, the bulk of investment goes in drilling development wells and the financial return is depending on how much reserve is effectively tapped by those wells. To improve project economics, both optimizing the well placements to access hydrocarbon and minimizing the number of wells are required. This study shows how proper well spacing used in development well planning is defined using the understanding of reservoir connectivity ratio at a given well spacing.\\n Firstly, reservoir correlation panels of wells drilled within the same trapping fault were created and the reservoir connectivity ratio at a given well spacing were collected. Hence the cross-plot between various well spacing and reservoir connectivity ratio was constructed to establish relationship. New reserves were derived by new pay from the spacing-connectivity relationship and estimated ultimate recovery per metre (EUR/m). With the estimated reserves varied by well spacing, the proper well spacing can be defined by identifying the narrowest well spacing that yield new incremental reserves above economic cut-off.\\n More than 100 cross-plots from Arthit project were conducted by using the existing wells information, the results suggest that a relationship between well spacing and reservoir connectivity ratio is varying depended on trap style, fault strike, channel width & oblique angle and hydrocarbon column height. A new/share pay ratio template is now available to illustrate an expected new/share pay ratio at a given well spacing (ranged from 100 m. to 1,500 m.) in each HC pay unit and subsurface geological trend. From the result, new pay ratio is in the range of 45%-60% at the current well spacing (400 m.) of Arthit Project. Based on the economic justification of Arthit project, there is the opportunity to narrow down well spacing for being economically viable in the future.\\n The optimum well spacing together with an economic viability analysis in each project could be done efficiently. Shortly, the proper given well spacing will be proactively planned for both infill and new wellhead platform. The 2021 infill projects help to validate the current model, improve the prediction function and certainly narrow down those uncertainties for future development projects.\\n Development planning would benefit greatly from proper well spacing so that the optimum number of wells is known upfront so project planning could be properly managed. If tighter well spacing could be applied, more wells could be filled into existing platforms. Then the big investment on new platforms could be deferred. Moreover, this method can be also broadened to other projects where GoT development model can be applied to achieve optimum commerciality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":283978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023\",\"volume\":\" 32\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22990-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22990-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于泰国湾(GoT)项目,大部分投资都用于钻井开发井,其财务回报取决于这些井有效开采了多少储量。为了提高项目的经济效益,既要优化井位以获取油气,又要尽量减少所需的井数。该研究表明,在给定井距下,如何利用油藏连通性来确定开发井规划中使用的适当井距。首先,建立同一圈闭断层内各井的储层对比图,采集给定井距下的储层连通性比;在此基础上,建立了不同井距与储层连通性比的交线图。新储量是根据空间连通性关系和估计的每米最终采收率(EUR/m)得出的。由于估计储量随井距的变化而变化,因此可以通过确定最窄的井距来确定合适的井距,该井距可以产生高于经济临界值的新增量储量。利用Arthit项目已有井资料进行了100余次交叉图分析,结果表明,井距与储层连通性的关系取决于圈闭类型、断层走向、河道宽度和斜角以及油气柱高度。现在可以使用一个新的/份额产层比模板来说明每个HC产层单元在给定井距(100米至1500米)和地下地质趋势下的预期新/份额产层比。结果表明,在artit项目现有井距(400 m)下,新产层率在45% ~ 60%之间。基于Arthit项目的经济合理性,有机会缩小井距,以便在未来具有经济可行性。可以有效地确定最佳井距,并对每个项目进行经济可行性分析。简而言之,将为填充井和新井口平台积极规划适当的井距。2021年的填充项目有助于验证当前模型,改进预测函数,当然也会缩小未来开发项目的不确定性。适当的井距将使开发规划受益匪浅,这样就可以提前知道最佳井数,从而可以适当地管理项目规划。如果可以采用更紧凑的井距,则可以在现有平台上填充更多的井。这样一来,对新平台的大笔投资就可以推迟。此外,这种方法也可以扩展到其他项目,在这些项目中,可以应用GoT开发模型来实现最佳的商业效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Proper Well Spacings – A Supplementary Method to Maximize The Gulf of Thailand Development Project Value
For The Gulf of Thailand (GoT) projects, the bulk of investment goes in drilling development wells and the financial return is depending on how much reserve is effectively tapped by those wells. To improve project economics, both optimizing the well placements to access hydrocarbon and minimizing the number of wells are required. This study shows how proper well spacing used in development well planning is defined using the understanding of reservoir connectivity ratio at a given well spacing. Firstly, reservoir correlation panels of wells drilled within the same trapping fault were created and the reservoir connectivity ratio at a given well spacing were collected. Hence the cross-plot between various well spacing and reservoir connectivity ratio was constructed to establish relationship. New reserves were derived by new pay from the spacing-connectivity relationship and estimated ultimate recovery per metre (EUR/m). With the estimated reserves varied by well spacing, the proper well spacing can be defined by identifying the narrowest well spacing that yield new incremental reserves above economic cut-off. More than 100 cross-plots from Arthit project were conducted by using the existing wells information, the results suggest that a relationship between well spacing and reservoir connectivity ratio is varying depended on trap style, fault strike, channel width & oblique angle and hydrocarbon column height. A new/share pay ratio template is now available to illustrate an expected new/share pay ratio at a given well spacing (ranged from 100 m. to 1,500 m.) in each HC pay unit and subsurface geological trend. From the result, new pay ratio is in the range of 45%-60% at the current well spacing (400 m.) of Arthit Project. Based on the economic justification of Arthit project, there is the opportunity to narrow down well spacing for being economically viable in the future. The optimum well spacing together with an economic viability analysis in each project could be done efficiently. Shortly, the proper given well spacing will be proactively planned for both infill and new wellhead platform. The 2021 infill projects help to validate the current model, improve the prediction function and certainly narrow down those uncertainties for future development projects. Development planning would benefit greatly from proper well spacing so that the optimum number of wells is known upfront so project planning could be properly managed. If tighter well spacing could be applied, more wells could be filled into existing platforms. Then the big investment on new platforms could be deferred. Moreover, this method can be also broadened to other projects where GoT development model can be applied to achieve optimum commerciality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Proper Well Spacings – A Supplementary Method to Maximize The Gulf of Thailand Development Project Value Seismic Driven Machine Learning to Improve Precision and Accelerate Screening Shallow Gas Potentials in Tunu Shallow Gas Zone, Mahakam Delta, Indonesia Rejuvenating Waterflood Reservoir in a Complex Geological Setting of a Matured Brown Field Intelligent Prediction of Downhole Drillstring Vibrations in Horizontal Wells by Employing Artificial Neural Network Sand Fill Clean-Out on Wireline Enables Access to Additional Perforation Zones in Gas Well Producer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1