用钻头、毛刺、激光和压电刀切割骨头:对临床医生的全面系统回顾和建议

A. Troedhan, Ziad Tarek, Mahmoud, M. Wainwright, Mohamed Moataz Khamis
{"title":"用钻头、毛刺、激光和压电刀切割骨头:对临床医生的全面系统回顾和建议","authors":"A. Troedhan, Ziad Tarek, Mahmoud, M. Wainwright, Mohamed Moataz Khamis","doi":"10.17352/2455-4634.0000128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: New tools for bone-cutting were introduced to oral and maxillofacial surgery in the last decade, such as lasers and piezotomes. Purpose: to evaluate most recent evidence, when surgical procedures performed with drills or burs are compared with laserand/or piezotome-surgical procedures in experimental and clinical studies and to assess possible advantages of their use in daily practice. Methods: a systematic search of various medical databases with specifi c keywords was performed, excluding studies published before 2006 for their possible invalidity by technological progress. Systematic reviews were assigned to Group 1, experimental studies ex vivo to Group 2, in vivo to Group 3 and clinical studies to Group 4. All studies in each of the groups 2 – 4 were appraised regarding their evidence, starting with a value of 0 for no evidence of advantages of lasers and/or piezotomes compared to rotary instruments, 1 for moderate evidence with verifi ed clinical impact and 2 for strong evidence and signifi cant clinical impact and statistically processed for their Evidence Value (EV) in each group and their Overall mean Evidence Value (OmEV). Results: 129 studies were fi nally included for evaluation. Two systematic reviews concluded lack of evidence for lasers to be advantageous over burs/drills. Nine reviews for piezotomes reveal strong evidence piezotome-surgery to signifi cantly reduce morbidity and to enhance soft-tissue preservation. Comparative experimental and clinical studies of burs/drills vs lasers revealed a low EV in Group 2 (EV:0,8), Group 3 (EV:0,5) and Group 4 (EV:0,5) with an OmEV of 0,6. Comparative studies burs/drills vs piezotomes resulted in a signifi cant EV in all groups (Group 2: 1,4, Group 3: 1,3, Group 4: 1,59) with an OmEV of 1,4. Conclusions: the results suggest too little evidence to establish lasers as an alternative to rotary instruments. Piezotomes seem to defi ne a possible new gold-standard in bone cutting due to their improved bone-healing, almost bone-lossless and precise osteotomy design, precise depth-control, softtissue protection as well as reduced intrasurgical and post-surgical morbidity. Review Article Cutting bone with drills, burs, lasers and piezotomes: A comprehensive systematic review and recommendations for the clinician Angelo Troedhan1*, Ziad Tarek Mahmoud2, Marcel Wainwright3 and Mohamed Moataz Khamis4 1Institute for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry, General Hospital “Krankenhaus Hietzing” of the City of Vienna, Vienna 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt 3School of Dentistry, University of Seville, Spain 4Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt Dates: Received: 29 July, 2017; Accepted: 12 August, 2017; Published: 14 August, 2017 *Corresponding author: Angelo Troedhan, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Institute for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry, Wolkersbergenstraße 1, 1130 Vienna, Austria, Tel: 0043 664 5009246; Fax: 0043 1 544912821; Email:","PeriodicalId":144574,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Oral and Craniofacial Science","volume":"98 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cutting bone with drills, burs, lasers and piezotomes: A comprehensive systematic review and recommendations for the clinician\",\"authors\":\"A. Troedhan, Ziad Tarek, Mahmoud, M. Wainwright, Mohamed Moataz Khamis\",\"doi\":\"10.17352/2455-4634.0000128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: New tools for bone-cutting were introduced to oral and maxillofacial surgery in the last decade, such as lasers and piezotomes. Purpose: to evaluate most recent evidence, when surgical procedures performed with drills or burs are compared with laserand/or piezotome-surgical procedures in experimental and clinical studies and to assess possible advantages of their use in daily practice. Methods: a systematic search of various medical databases with specifi c keywords was performed, excluding studies published before 2006 for their possible invalidity by technological progress. Systematic reviews were assigned to Group 1, experimental studies ex vivo to Group 2, in vivo to Group 3 and clinical studies to Group 4. All studies in each of the groups 2 – 4 were appraised regarding their evidence, starting with a value of 0 for no evidence of advantages of lasers and/or piezotomes compared to rotary instruments, 1 for moderate evidence with verifi ed clinical impact and 2 for strong evidence and signifi cant clinical impact and statistically processed for their Evidence Value (EV) in each group and their Overall mean Evidence Value (OmEV). Results: 129 studies were fi nally included for evaluation. Two systematic reviews concluded lack of evidence for lasers to be advantageous over burs/drills. Nine reviews for piezotomes reveal strong evidence piezotome-surgery to signifi cantly reduce morbidity and to enhance soft-tissue preservation. Comparative experimental and clinical studies of burs/drills vs lasers revealed a low EV in Group 2 (EV:0,8), Group 3 (EV:0,5) and Group 4 (EV:0,5) with an OmEV of 0,6. Comparative studies burs/drills vs piezotomes resulted in a signifi cant EV in all groups (Group 2: 1,4, Group 3: 1,3, Group 4: 1,59) with an OmEV of 1,4. Conclusions: the results suggest too little evidence to establish lasers as an alternative to rotary instruments. Piezotomes seem to defi ne a possible new gold-standard in bone cutting due to their improved bone-healing, almost bone-lossless and precise osteotomy design, precise depth-control, softtissue protection as well as reduced intrasurgical and post-surgical morbidity. Review Article Cutting bone with drills, burs, lasers and piezotomes: A comprehensive systematic review and recommendations for the clinician Angelo Troedhan1*, Ziad Tarek Mahmoud2, Marcel Wainwright3 and Mohamed Moataz Khamis4 1Institute for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry, General Hospital “Krankenhaus Hietzing” of the City of Vienna, Vienna 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt 3School of Dentistry, University of Seville, Spain 4Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt Dates: Received: 29 July, 2017; Accepted: 12 August, 2017; Published: 14 August, 2017 *Corresponding author: Angelo Troedhan, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Institute for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry, Wolkersbergenstraße 1, 1130 Vienna, Austria, Tel: 0043 664 5009246; Fax: 0043 1 544912821; Email:\",\"PeriodicalId\":144574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Oral and Craniofacial Science\",\"volume\":\"98 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Oral and Craniofacial Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-4634.0000128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Oral and Craniofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-4634.0000128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:在过去的十年中,新的骨切割工具被引入口腔颌面外科,如激光和压电刀。目的:在实验和临床研究中将钻头或毛刺进行的外科手术与激光和/或压电外科手术进行比较时,评估最新的证据,并评估其在日常实践中使用的可能优势。方法:以特定关键词系统检索各类医学数据库,排除2006年以前发表的因技术进步可能无效的文献。系统评价组为1组,离体实验研究组为2组,体内实验研究组为3组,临床研究组为4组。对第2 - 4组的所有研究的证据进行评价,0表示没有证据表明激光和/或压电体与旋转器械相比具有优势,1表示具有证实的临床影响的中等证据,2表示具有强烈的临床影响,并对每组的证据值(EV)及其总体平均证据值(OmEV)进行统计处理。结果:129项研究最终纳入评估。两项系统综述得出结论,缺乏证据表明激光比毛刺/钻头更有利。九篇关于压电体的综述揭示了压电体手术显著降低发病率和增强软组织保存的有力证据。对比实验和临床研究表明,第2组(EV:0,8)、第3组(EV:0,5)和第4组(EV:0,5)的OmEV较低,OmEV为0,6。比较研究表明,在所有组中(组2:1,4,组3:1,3,组4:1,59),毛刺/钻头与压电片的EV均显著,其OmEV为1,4。结论:结果表明太少的证据来建立激光作为旋转仪器的替代品。由于其改进的骨愈合,几乎无骨损失和精确的截骨设计,精确的深度控制,软组织保护以及减少术中和术后发病率,压电刀似乎定义了一个可能的骨切割新金标准。用钻头、毛刺、激光和压电刀切割骨头;对临床医生Angelo Troedhan1*、Ziad Tarek mahmou2、Marcel Wainwright3和Mohamed Moataz Khamis4进行全面的系统评价和推荐1 .维也纳市“Krankenhaus Hietzing”总医院口腔颌面外科和牙科研究所2 .埃及亚历山大大学口腔颌面外科学系3 .西班牙塞维利大学牙科学院4 .口腔修复学系,维也纳牙科学院收稿日期:2017年7月29日;录用日期:2017年8月12日;通讯作者:Angelo Troedhan, Krankenhaus Hietzing,奥地利维也纳Wolkersbergenstraße 1, 1130,奥地利维也纳,电话:0043 664 5009246;传真:0043 1 544912821;电子邮件:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cutting bone with drills, burs, lasers and piezotomes: A comprehensive systematic review and recommendations for the clinician
Background: New tools for bone-cutting were introduced to oral and maxillofacial surgery in the last decade, such as lasers and piezotomes. Purpose: to evaluate most recent evidence, when surgical procedures performed with drills or burs are compared with laserand/or piezotome-surgical procedures in experimental and clinical studies and to assess possible advantages of their use in daily practice. Methods: a systematic search of various medical databases with specifi c keywords was performed, excluding studies published before 2006 for their possible invalidity by technological progress. Systematic reviews were assigned to Group 1, experimental studies ex vivo to Group 2, in vivo to Group 3 and clinical studies to Group 4. All studies in each of the groups 2 – 4 were appraised regarding their evidence, starting with a value of 0 for no evidence of advantages of lasers and/or piezotomes compared to rotary instruments, 1 for moderate evidence with verifi ed clinical impact and 2 for strong evidence and signifi cant clinical impact and statistically processed for their Evidence Value (EV) in each group and their Overall mean Evidence Value (OmEV). Results: 129 studies were fi nally included for evaluation. Two systematic reviews concluded lack of evidence for lasers to be advantageous over burs/drills. Nine reviews for piezotomes reveal strong evidence piezotome-surgery to signifi cantly reduce morbidity and to enhance soft-tissue preservation. Comparative experimental and clinical studies of burs/drills vs lasers revealed a low EV in Group 2 (EV:0,8), Group 3 (EV:0,5) and Group 4 (EV:0,5) with an OmEV of 0,6. Comparative studies burs/drills vs piezotomes resulted in a signifi cant EV in all groups (Group 2: 1,4, Group 3: 1,3, Group 4: 1,59) with an OmEV of 1,4. Conclusions: the results suggest too little evidence to establish lasers as an alternative to rotary instruments. Piezotomes seem to defi ne a possible new gold-standard in bone cutting due to their improved bone-healing, almost bone-lossless and precise osteotomy design, precise depth-control, softtissue protection as well as reduced intrasurgical and post-surgical morbidity. Review Article Cutting bone with drills, burs, lasers and piezotomes: A comprehensive systematic review and recommendations for the clinician Angelo Troedhan1*, Ziad Tarek Mahmoud2, Marcel Wainwright3 and Mohamed Moataz Khamis4 1Institute for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry, General Hospital “Krankenhaus Hietzing” of the City of Vienna, Vienna 2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt 3School of Dentistry, University of Seville, Spain 4Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt Dates: Received: 29 July, 2017; Accepted: 12 August, 2017; Published: 14 August, 2017 *Corresponding author: Angelo Troedhan, Krankenhaus Hietzing, Institute for Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry, Wolkersbergenstraße 1, 1130 Vienna, Austria, Tel: 0043 664 5009246; Fax: 0043 1 544912821; Email:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A brief overview of wind tunnel test and CFD to investigate the wind effects on tall building Principles and concepts of occlusion in restorative dentistry Zygomatic complex fractures in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: An update on the pattern of presentation and care Transosteal radial free flap in palate reconstruction The effect of radiation dose on CBCT measurements of maxillary gingival thickness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1