教程:现代分布式系统中的一致性选择

Alexey Gotsman
{"title":"教程:现代分布式系统中的一致性选择","authors":"Alexey Gotsman","doi":"10.1145/3212734.3212800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distributed systems underlying large-scale Internet services often guarantee immediate availability and tolerate network failures at the expense of providing only weak data consistency guarantees. This is compensated for by new programming constructs, such as replicated data types (aka CRDTs) and novel forms of transactions. Navigating the spectrum of possible consistency models and programming constructs is far from trivial. This tutorial surveys recent developments that help in this: formal definitions of consistency model semantics and methods for reasoning about how the weakness of consistency models affects the correctness of applications using them.","PeriodicalId":198284,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tutorial: Consistency Choices in Modern Distributed Systems\",\"authors\":\"Alexey Gotsman\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3212734.3212800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Distributed systems underlying large-scale Internet services often guarantee immediate availability and tolerate network failures at the expense of providing only weak data consistency guarantees. This is compensated for by new programming constructs, such as replicated data types (aka CRDTs) and novel forms of transactions. Navigating the spectrum of possible consistency models and programming constructs is far from trivial. This tutorial surveys recent developments that help in this: formal definitions of consistency model semantics and methods for reasoning about how the weakness of consistency models affects the correctness of applications using them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3212734.3212800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3212734.3212800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于大规模Internet服务的分布式系统通常保证即时可用性,并以仅提供弱数据一致性保证为代价容忍网络故障。新的编程结构弥补了这一点,例如复制数据类型(又称crdt)和新的事务形式。浏览各种可能的一致性模型和编程结构绝非易事。本教程概述了有助于实现以下目标的最新发展:一致性模型语义的正式定义和用于推断一致性模型的弱点如何影响使用它们的应用程序的正确性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tutorial: Consistency Choices in Modern Distributed Systems
Distributed systems underlying large-scale Internet services often guarantee immediate availability and tolerate network failures at the expense of providing only weak data consistency guarantees. This is compensated for by new programming constructs, such as replicated data types (aka CRDTs) and novel forms of transactions. Navigating the spectrum of possible consistency models and programming constructs is far from trivial. This tutorial surveys recent developments that help in this: formal definitions of consistency model semantics and methods for reasoning about how the weakness of consistency models affects the correctness of applications using them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tutorial: Consistency Choices in Modern Distributed Systems Locking Timestamps versus Locking Objects Recoverable Mutual Exclusion Under System-Wide Failures Nesting-Safe Recoverable Linearizability: Modular Constructions for Non-Volatile Memory Brief Announcement: Beeping a Time-Optimal Leader Election
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1