经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)术后IPSS问卷的回顾,以简化随访方案

G. Broadley, G. Delves, S. Khwaja
{"title":"经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)术后IPSS问卷的回顾,以简化随访方案","authors":"G. Broadley, G. Delves, S. Khwaja","doi":"10.22374/JELEU.V2I2.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveClarify the role of IPSS questionnaire for post TURP operation patients, to assess and streamline best follow-up protocols \nMaterials and MethodsWe identified 87 consecutive patients over 6 months undergoing standardized bipolar TURP. We retro-spectively reviewed patients at 3 months in follow-up clinic, where we performed tests including Qmax, Post-void residual (PVR) and IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score). We identified patients who were discharged or underwent a change in standard management at this point, and used ROC (Receiver Operating Curve) curve analysis to identify the tools which showed the best ability to predict this decision. ResultsROC curve analysis suggested Qmax (AUC: 0.7751) and IPSS (AUC 0.8571) were the best tools to predict a change in management. Given the IPSS tool is a questionnaire, thus holding most promise to streamline protocols, we applied Youden-J test to show IPSS=8 cut-off was best to identify management changes. \nConclusionThe IPSS tool is able to predict a need for change in management in post TURP patients at 3 months. This will allow a simple triage system to provide an efficient and effective decision-making process for discharge without the need for clinic attendance.","PeriodicalId":136362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endoluminal Endourology","volume":"207 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of IPSS Questionnaire in Postoperative Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) for Streamlining Follow-up Protocols\",\"authors\":\"G. Broadley, G. Delves, S. Khwaja\",\"doi\":\"10.22374/JELEU.V2I2.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveClarify the role of IPSS questionnaire for post TURP operation patients, to assess and streamline best follow-up protocols \\nMaterials and MethodsWe identified 87 consecutive patients over 6 months undergoing standardized bipolar TURP. We retro-spectively reviewed patients at 3 months in follow-up clinic, where we performed tests including Qmax, Post-void residual (PVR) and IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score). We identified patients who were discharged or underwent a change in standard management at this point, and used ROC (Receiver Operating Curve) curve analysis to identify the tools which showed the best ability to predict this decision. ResultsROC curve analysis suggested Qmax (AUC: 0.7751) and IPSS (AUC 0.8571) were the best tools to predict a change in management. Given the IPSS tool is a questionnaire, thus holding most promise to streamline protocols, we applied Youden-J test to show IPSS=8 cut-off was best to identify management changes. \\nConclusionThe IPSS tool is able to predict a need for change in management in post TURP patients at 3 months. This will allow a simple triage system to provide an efficient and effective decision-making process for discharge without the need for clinic attendance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Endoluminal Endourology\",\"volume\":\"207 \",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Endoluminal Endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22374/JELEU.V2I2.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endoluminal Endourology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22374/JELEU.V2I2.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的明确IPSS问卷在TURP术后患者中的作用,以评估和简化最佳随访方案。材料和方法我们确定了87例连续6个月以上接受标准化双极TURP的患者。我们在随访3个月的临床中对患者进行回顾性研究,在那里我们进行了Qmax,后虚空残留(PVR)和IPSS(国际前列腺症状评分)的测试。我们确定了此时出院或接受标准管理改变的患者,并使用ROC(接受者工作曲线)曲线分析来确定最能预测该决定的工具。结果roc曲线分析显示,Qmax (AUC: 0.7751)和IPSS (AUC: 0.8571)是预测管理变化的最佳工具。鉴于IPSS工具是一份问卷,因此最有希望简化协议,我们应用Youden-J测试来显示IPSS=8截止值是识别管理变化的最佳方法。结论IPSS工具能够预测TURP术后患者在3个月时是否需要改变治疗方法。这将允许一个简单的分诊系统,为出院提供一个高效和有效的决策过程,而不需要诊所出席。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review of IPSS Questionnaire in Postoperative Transurethral Resection of Prostate (TURP) for Streamlining Follow-up Protocols
ObjectiveClarify the role of IPSS questionnaire for post TURP operation patients, to assess and streamline best follow-up protocols Materials and MethodsWe identified 87 consecutive patients over 6 months undergoing standardized bipolar TURP. We retro-spectively reviewed patients at 3 months in follow-up clinic, where we performed tests including Qmax, Post-void residual (PVR) and IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score). We identified patients who were discharged or underwent a change in standard management at this point, and used ROC (Receiver Operating Curve) curve analysis to identify the tools which showed the best ability to predict this decision. ResultsROC curve analysis suggested Qmax (AUC: 0.7751) and IPSS (AUC 0.8571) were the best tools to predict a change in management. Given the IPSS tool is a questionnaire, thus holding most promise to streamline protocols, we applied Youden-J test to show IPSS=8 cut-off was best to identify management changes. ConclusionThe IPSS tool is able to predict a need for change in management in post TURP patients at 3 months. This will allow a simple triage system to provide an efficient and effective decision-making process for discharge without the need for clinic attendance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inverted Y Ureteral Duplication with Distal Obstructing Calculi in the Ectopic Ureter in the Prostatic Urethra Post-operative Events with Post-operative Day One Stent Removal after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Teflon Injections (STING) Mimicking Distal Ureteric Stones Proceedings of the Welsh Urological Society Annual Meeting The Role of the ClearPetra Suction Access Sheath and UROFINO Disposable Ureteroscope as an Alternative to PCNL/Conventional Flexible Ureteroscopy for a Large Renal Pelvis Stone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1