煽动叛乱法:是敌是友?

Aryan Data, Khushi Gupta
{"title":"煽动叛乱法:是敌是友?","authors":"Aryan Data, Khushi Gupta","doi":"10.59126/v1i3a15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Freedom of opinion and expression is essential for the entire development of a person. They are the foundation of any free and democratic society. Because it gives meaning to life, freedom of speech and expression is the first and basic human right, the basic condition of freedom, and the mother of all rights. However, when exercising freedom of speech, questions often arise, such as how far the state can regulate individual behavior. Personal autonomy is the cornerstone of basic freedom; therefore, every constraint is strictly evaluated. However, this right can always be appropriately restricted to ensure that it is used correctly and that all people have equal access to it. Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code of 1860 defines sedition as a criminal offence. The importance of this part in an independent and democratic country is a hotly debated topic. This article looks at sedition and why it cannot be compared with Article 19 (Right of Freedom of Speech and Expression) of the Indian Constitution. It also raises the issue of application in a democratic world where freedom of speech and expression is regarded as the mother of all rights, and compares India’s sedition legislation with those of Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, as India’s sedition law viewpoint Different from other countries.","PeriodicalId":424180,"journal":{"name":"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS","volume":"47 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SEDITION LAW: A FRIEND OR FOE?\",\"authors\":\"Aryan Data, Khushi Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.59126/v1i3a15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Freedom of opinion and expression is essential for the entire development of a person. They are the foundation of any free and democratic society. Because it gives meaning to life, freedom of speech and expression is the first and basic human right, the basic condition of freedom, and the mother of all rights. However, when exercising freedom of speech, questions often arise, such as how far the state can regulate individual behavior. Personal autonomy is the cornerstone of basic freedom; therefore, every constraint is strictly evaluated. However, this right can always be appropriately restricted to ensure that it is used correctly and that all people have equal access to it. Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code of 1860 defines sedition as a criminal offence. The importance of this part in an independent and democratic country is a hotly debated topic. This article looks at sedition and why it cannot be compared with Article 19 (Right of Freedom of Speech and Expression) of the Indian Constitution. It also raises the issue of application in a democratic world where freedom of speech and expression is regarded as the mother of all rights, and compares India’s sedition legislation with those of Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, as India’s sedition law viewpoint Different from other countries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS\",\"volume\":\"47 8\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59126/v1i3a15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE JOURNAL OF UNIQUE LAWS AND STUDENTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59126/v1i3a15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

见解和言论自由对一个人的全面发展至关重要。它们是任何自由民主社会的基础。因为言论和表达自由赋予了生命意义,所以它是首要和基本的人权,是自由的基本条件,是所有权利之母。然而,在行使言论自由时,经常会出现问题,例如国家可以在多大程度上规范个人行为。个人自主权是基本自由的基石;因此,每个约束都是严格评估的。然而,这项权利总是可以适当地加以限制,以确保它得到正确使用,并确保所有人都有平等的机会使用它。1860年印度刑法典第124A条将煽动叛乱定义为刑事犯罪。在一个独立民主的国家,这部分的重要性是一个热议的话题。这篇文章着眼于煽动,以及为什么它不能与印度宪法第19条(言论自由权)进行比较。文章还提出了在言论和表达自由被视为一切权利之母的民主世界中的适用问题,并将印度的煽动法与澳大利亚、英国和美利坚合众国的煽动法进行了比较,因为印度的煽动法观点与其他国家不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SEDITION LAW: A FRIEND OR FOE?
Freedom of opinion and expression is essential for the entire development of a person. They are the foundation of any free and democratic society. Because it gives meaning to life, freedom of speech and expression is the first and basic human right, the basic condition of freedom, and the mother of all rights. However, when exercising freedom of speech, questions often arise, such as how far the state can regulate individual behavior. Personal autonomy is the cornerstone of basic freedom; therefore, every constraint is strictly evaluated. However, this right can always be appropriately restricted to ensure that it is used correctly and that all people have equal access to it. Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code of 1860 defines sedition as a criminal offence. The importance of this part in an independent and democratic country is a hotly debated topic. This article looks at sedition and why it cannot be compared with Article 19 (Right of Freedom of Speech and Expression) of the Indian Constitution. It also raises the issue of application in a democratic world where freedom of speech and expression is regarded as the mother of all rights, and compares India’s sedition legislation with those of Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, as India’s sedition law viewpoint Different from other countries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN INDIA: CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS AND IMPLICATIONS ON MODERN ISSUES JUDICIAL REVIEW: EXPLORING THE ROLE OF JUDICIARY IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATIONS DUE PROCESS: EVALUATING ITS APPLICATION IN CRIMINAL AND CIVIL PROCEEDINGS FUTURE OF BLOCKCHAIN GOVERNANCE: EXPLORING DECENTRALIZED DEMOCRACY DATA PROTECTION AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: THE INTERSECTION OF PRIVACY AND INFORMATION SECURITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1