膨胀聚苯乙烯土工泡沫塑料对公路路堤软土加固的数值模拟

Nur Fatin Amira Zianal, M. F. Yusof, A. Madun, F. Pakir, Mohd Khaidir Abu Talib, Z. Abu Talib
{"title":"膨胀聚苯乙烯土工泡沫塑料对公路路堤软土加固的数值模拟","authors":"Nur Fatin Amira Zianal, M. F. Yusof, A. Madun, F. Pakir, Mohd Khaidir Abu Talib, Z. Abu Talib","doi":"10.30880/jsue.2022.02.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soft soil brings abundant engineering issues due to low bearing capacity and shear strength. A comprehensive study of soft ground needs to be reviewed and identified before construction can start. Various techniques can be used to improve the soil. However, this study focuses on using material namely expanded polystyrene. The geotextile is embedded with expanded polystyrene to strengthen the soil condition. This study adopted the soil parameters from East Coast Expressway. There are two models in this study, which are earth embankment and EPS embankment. The settlement of the earth embankment is compared with the EPS embankment after construction. The Mohr-Coulomb parameters are used to model the soft soil and embankments, while the linear elastic parameters were adopted to model the EPS and geotextile. This study produced two embankment models, the conventional embankment models with and without surcharge. The second model is an EPS embankment with various densities (22 kg/m3, 29 kg/m3, and 39 kg/m3). The settlement is recorded for ten years after the embankment construction was completed. The difference settlement value for the conventionalmodel is 28mm. The settlement value for EPS 22 is 3.18mm, EPS 29 is 2.06mm, and EPS 39 is 1.51mm. For the geotextile embedded in EPS, the settlement for EPS 22 is 3.17mm, EPS 29 is 2.04mm, and EPS 39 is 1.49mmrespectively. Since EPS uses three different densities, from the prediction of PLAXIS 2D, the higher density gives the lower value of the settlement. However, when the geotextile is embedded with EPS, there is no significant difference in settlement behaviour. In conclusion, the model with a surcharge gives a lower settlement than themodel without a surcharge. But the expanded polystyrene block is the best model to reduce the settlement compared with the conventional model with a surcharge. Different densities of EPS resulted in different settlement value, and EPS 39 gives the lowest settlement value. In terms of the geotextile embedded with EPS, it does not give a significant change in settlement.","PeriodicalId":277750,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Underground Exploration","volume":"67 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Modelling of Soft Soil Improvement Using Expanded Polystyrene Geofoam for Road Embankment\",\"authors\":\"Nur Fatin Amira Zianal, M. F. Yusof, A. Madun, F. Pakir, Mohd Khaidir Abu Talib, Z. Abu Talib\",\"doi\":\"10.30880/jsue.2022.02.01.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soft soil brings abundant engineering issues due to low bearing capacity and shear strength. A comprehensive study of soft ground needs to be reviewed and identified before construction can start. Various techniques can be used to improve the soil. However, this study focuses on using material namely expanded polystyrene. The geotextile is embedded with expanded polystyrene to strengthen the soil condition. This study adopted the soil parameters from East Coast Expressway. There are two models in this study, which are earth embankment and EPS embankment. The settlement of the earth embankment is compared with the EPS embankment after construction. The Mohr-Coulomb parameters are used to model the soft soil and embankments, while the linear elastic parameters were adopted to model the EPS and geotextile. This study produced two embankment models, the conventional embankment models with and without surcharge. The second model is an EPS embankment with various densities (22 kg/m3, 29 kg/m3, and 39 kg/m3). The settlement is recorded for ten years after the embankment construction was completed. The difference settlement value for the conventionalmodel is 28mm. The settlement value for EPS 22 is 3.18mm, EPS 29 is 2.06mm, and EPS 39 is 1.51mm. For the geotextile embedded in EPS, the settlement for EPS 22 is 3.17mm, EPS 29 is 2.04mm, and EPS 39 is 1.49mmrespectively. Since EPS uses three different densities, from the prediction of PLAXIS 2D, the higher density gives the lower value of the settlement. However, when the geotextile is embedded with EPS, there is no significant difference in settlement behaviour. In conclusion, the model with a surcharge gives a lower settlement than themodel without a surcharge. But the expanded polystyrene block is the best model to reduce the settlement compared with the conventional model with a surcharge. Different densities of EPS resulted in different settlement value, and EPS 39 gives the lowest settlement value. In terms of the geotextile embedded with EPS, it does not give a significant change in settlement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainable Underground Exploration\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainable Underground Exploration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30880/jsue.2022.02.01.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Underground Exploration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30880/jsue.2022.02.01.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软土的承载力和抗剪强度较低,给工程带来了诸多问题。在施工开始之前,需要对软土地基进行全面的研究。可以采用各种技术来改良土壤。然而,本研究的重点是使用膨胀聚苯乙烯材料。土工布内嵌膨胀聚苯乙烯,加固土质。本研究采用东海岸高速公路土体参数。本研究采用土路堤和EPS路堤两种模型。对土路堤与EPS路堤施工后的沉降进行了比较。采用莫尔库仑参数对软土和路堤进行建模,采用线弹性参数对EPS和土工布进行建模。本文建立了两种路堤模型,即有附加和无附加的常规路堤模型。第二个模型是不同密度的EPS路堤(22 kg/m3, 29 kg/m3和39 kg/m3)。沉降记录是在堤防建设完成后的十年。常规模型的差分沉降值为28mm。EPS 22沉降值为3.18mm, EPS 29沉降值为2.06mm, EPS 39沉降值为1.51mm。在EPS中嵌入土工布,EPS 22沉降量为3.17mm, EPS 29沉降量为2.04mm, EPS 39沉降量为1.49mm。由于EPS使用了三种不同的密度,从PLAXIS 2D的预测来看,密度越高,沉降值越低。然而,当土工布中嵌入EPS时,沉降行为没有显著差异。综上所述,有附加费模型的沉降比无附加费模型的沉降要低。但与常规的附加荷载模型相比,膨胀聚苯乙烯块体模型是减小沉降的最佳模型。不同密度的EPS沉降值不同,EPS 39沉降值最低。对于嵌入EPS的土工布,其沉降没有明显变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical Modelling of Soft Soil Improvement Using Expanded Polystyrene Geofoam for Road Embankment
Soft soil brings abundant engineering issues due to low bearing capacity and shear strength. A comprehensive study of soft ground needs to be reviewed and identified before construction can start. Various techniques can be used to improve the soil. However, this study focuses on using material namely expanded polystyrene. The geotextile is embedded with expanded polystyrene to strengthen the soil condition. This study adopted the soil parameters from East Coast Expressway. There are two models in this study, which are earth embankment and EPS embankment. The settlement of the earth embankment is compared with the EPS embankment after construction. The Mohr-Coulomb parameters are used to model the soft soil and embankments, while the linear elastic parameters were adopted to model the EPS and geotextile. This study produced two embankment models, the conventional embankment models with and without surcharge. The second model is an EPS embankment with various densities (22 kg/m3, 29 kg/m3, and 39 kg/m3). The settlement is recorded for ten years after the embankment construction was completed. The difference settlement value for the conventionalmodel is 28mm. The settlement value for EPS 22 is 3.18mm, EPS 29 is 2.06mm, and EPS 39 is 1.51mm. For the geotextile embedded in EPS, the settlement for EPS 22 is 3.17mm, EPS 29 is 2.04mm, and EPS 39 is 1.49mmrespectively. Since EPS uses three different densities, from the prediction of PLAXIS 2D, the higher density gives the lower value of the settlement. However, when the geotextile is embedded with EPS, there is no significant difference in settlement behaviour. In conclusion, the model with a surcharge gives a lower settlement than themodel without a surcharge. But the expanded polystyrene block is the best model to reduce the settlement compared with the conventional model with a surcharge. Different densities of EPS resulted in different settlement value, and EPS 39 gives the lowest settlement value. In terms of the geotextile embedded with EPS, it does not give a significant change in settlement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Marine Clay Soil Treated with Demolished Tile Waste: A Systematic Literature Review Correlation of Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Geotechnical Field Data for Soil Profile Characterization Compressibility Behaviour On Carbonation of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) Treated Kaolin Impact of Sugarcane Bagasse Ash (SCBA) and Cement to the Strength Improvement of Hemic Peat Numerical Modelling of Tunnel-Ground Interaction with Building Existence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1