异质催化:扎姆法拉州高中课程和项目教学技术对学生对热和蒸汽概念理解的效果

S. Bashir, Marvellous Ogundeji Oluwatomisin, B. Abdullahi
{"title":"异质催化:扎姆法拉州高中课程和项目教学技术对学生对热和蒸汽概念理解的效果","authors":"S. Bashir, Marvellous Ogundeji Oluwatomisin, B. Abdullahi","doi":"10.31248/ijet2022.144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study sought to find out the relative effect of curriculum and item-teaching techniques on students’ conceptual understanding in heat and vapours in senior secondary school in Zamfara State. Three research questions and three null hypotheses guided the study. The study adopted a quasi-experimental research design, precisely non-equivalent control group design. Simple random and Purposive sampling techniques were used to select a sample of 157 SS2 physics students for the study. Thermal Conceptual and Traditional Physics Exercises (TCTPE), which has twenty (20) items, was used to collect data for the study. Three experts in Department of Science Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, validated the instrument. Two reliability estimates confirmed the reliability of the instrument (TCTPE). The first tested the temporal stability and the second, the internal consistency of the TCTPE. The estimated values of 0.76 and 0.82 were obtained. The data obtained for the study were analyzed using frequencies, percentages, mean and standard deviation. Also, Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and Chi-square were used to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. Findings of the study revealed that item-teaching technique increase students’ achievement (or test) score in Traditional Physics Exercises in Heat and Vapour. However, there is no statistically significant difference in the mean achievement score of students given traditional physics exercises in heat and vapours under curriculum and item-teaching techniques. Meanwhile, students under curriculum teaching techniques had higher Conceptual Understanding mean score in heat and vapours, compared to their counterpart under item-teaching techniques. Finally, it was revealed that majority of students under curriculum teaching techniques were on scientific/conceptual understanding level, compared to their counterpart under item-teaching techniques where a very small number of students were on Scientific/Conceptual Understanding level. The study therefore, recommends that Physics teachers should teach to the curriculum for scientific/conceptual understanding of Senior Secondary School Students.","PeriodicalId":344221,"journal":{"name":"Integrity Journal of Education and Training","volume":"62 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heterogeneous catalysis: Efficacy of curriculum and item-teaching techniques on students’ conceptual understanding of heat and vapours among senior secondary schools in Zamfara State\",\"authors\":\"S. Bashir, Marvellous Ogundeji Oluwatomisin, B. Abdullahi\",\"doi\":\"10.31248/ijet2022.144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study sought to find out the relative effect of curriculum and item-teaching techniques on students’ conceptual understanding in heat and vapours in senior secondary school in Zamfara State. Three research questions and three null hypotheses guided the study. The study adopted a quasi-experimental research design, precisely non-equivalent control group design. Simple random and Purposive sampling techniques were used to select a sample of 157 SS2 physics students for the study. Thermal Conceptual and Traditional Physics Exercises (TCTPE), which has twenty (20) items, was used to collect data for the study. Three experts in Department of Science Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, validated the instrument. Two reliability estimates confirmed the reliability of the instrument (TCTPE). The first tested the temporal stability and the second, the internal consistency of the TCTPE. The estimated values of 0.76 and 0.82 were obtained. The data obtained for the study were analyzed using frequencies, percentages, mean and standard deviation. Also, Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and Chi-square were used to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. Findings of the study revealed that item-teaching technique increase students’ achievement (or test) score in Traditional Physics Exercises in Heat and Vapour. However, there is no statistically significant difference in the mean achievement score of students given traditional physics exercises in heat and vapours under curriculum and item-teaching techniques. Meanwhile, students under curriculum teaching techniques had higher Conceptual Understanding mean score in heat and vapours, compared to their counterpart under item-teaching techniques. Finally, it was revealed that majority of students under curriculum teaching techniques were on scientific/conceptual understanding level, compared to their counterpart under item-teaching techniques where a very small number of students were on Scientific/Conceptual Understanding level. The study therefore, recommends that Physics teachers should teach to the curriculum for scientific/conceptual understanding of Senior Secondary School Students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrity Journal of Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"62 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrity Journal of Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31248/ijet2022.144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrity Journal of Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31248/ijet2022.144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在找出课程和项目教学技术对Zamfara州高中学生对热和蒸汽概念理解的相对影响。三个研究问题和三个零假设指导了研究。本研究采用准实验研究设计,即非等效对照组设计。本研究采用简单随机抽样和有目的抽样的方法,选取了157名SS2物理专业学生进行研究。热概念和传统物理练习(TCTPE)有二十(20)个项目,用于收集研究数据。尼日利亚大学恩苏卡分校科学教育系的三位专家对该仪器进行了验证。两次可靠性评估证实了仪器的可靠性(TCTPE)。第一个测试了TCTPE的时间稳定性,第二个测试了TCTPE的内部一致性。得到的估计值分别为0.76和0.82。研究中获得的数据使用频率、百分比、平均值和标准差进行分析。采用协方差分析(ANCOVA)和卡方分析在0.05的显著性水平上对原假设进行检验。研究结果表明,项目教学技术提高了学生在传统物理习题中的成绩(或考试成绩)。然而,在课程和项目教学方法下,传统物理习题的学生平均成绩没有统计学上的显著差异。与此同时,课程教学方式下的学生在热和蒸汽的概念理解平均得分高于项目教学方式下的学生。最后,我们发现课程教学方法下的大多数学生是在科学/概念理解水平上,而项目教学方法下的学生是在科学/概念理解水平上,只有极少数学生是在科学/概念理解水平上。因此,本研究建议高中物理教师应教授有助于学生科学/概念理解的课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Heterogeneous catalysis: Efficacy of curriculum and item-teaching techniques on students’ conceptual understanding of heat and vapours among senior secondary schools in Zamfara State
The study sought to find out the relative effect of curriculum and item-teaching techniques on students’ conceptual understanding in heat and vapours in senior secondary school in Zamfara State. Three research questions and three null hypotheses guided the study. The study adopted a quasi-experimental research design, precisely non-equivalent control group design. Simple random and Purposive sampling techniques were used to select a sample of 157 SS2 physics students for the study. Thermal Conceptual and Traditional Physics Exercises (TCTPE), which has twenty (20) items, was used to collect data for the study. Three experts in Department of Science Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, validated the instrument. Two reliability estimates confirmed the reliability of the instrument (TCTPE). The first tested the temporal stability and the second, the internal consistency of the TCTPE. The estimated values of 0.76 and 0.82 were obtained. The data obtained for the study were analyzed using frequencies, percentages, mean and standard deviation. Also, Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and Chi-square were used to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 level of significance. Findings of the study revealed that item-teaching technique increase students’ achievement (or test) score in Traditional Physics Exercises in Heat and Vapour. However, there is no statistically significant difference in the mean achievement score of students given traditional physics exercises in heat and vapours under curriculum and item-teaching techniques. Meanwhile, students under curriculum teaching techniques had higher Conceptual Understanding mean score in heat and vapours, compared to their counterpart under item-teaching techniques. Finally, it was revealed that majority of students under curriculum teaching techniques were on scientific/conceptual understanding level, compared to their counterpart under item-teaching techniques where a very small number of students were on Scientific/Conceptual Understanding level. The study therefore, recommends that Physics teachers should teach to the curriculum for scientific/conceptual understanding of Senior Secondary School Students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of National Home-Grown School Feeding Programme on primary school pupils attendance and academic performance in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria Clients’ perception of quality tertiary education in Ghana Approaches to improving management of secondary education for maximum goal attainment The effect of differentiated instruction approach on students’ academic achievement and attitudes: A meta-analysis study Knowledge acquisition practices among Library and Information Science educators in universities in South-West, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1