致癌作用和基因毒性致癌物

D. Mcgregor
{"title":"致癌作用和基因毒性致癌物","authors":"D. Mcgregor","doi":"10.1002/9780470744307.GAT077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The definition of a carcinogen in an experimental context is an agent which increases the incidence of any neoplasm irrespective of whether it is lethal, potentially lethal or benign. As genetic factors are fundamental in carcinogenesis these are briefly reviewed. A description of some of the problems associated with carcinogenicity experiments and the interpretation of their results is presented. Particular emphasis is given to so-called genotoxic carcinogens. ‘So-called’ because there are unresolved difficulties in defining the weight and strength of evidence required for concluding that genotoxicity is indeed the mode of carcinogenic action (MOA), rather than simply concluding that the MOA is unknown. A genotoxic MOA that is based on reactivity with DNA may lead currently to the unverifiable and therefore counter-scientific default assumption that there is no dose without an effect on cancer incidence. Carcinogenicity test design, including the use of the maximum tolerated dose, is briefly discussed. This is followed by consideration of issues and challenges presented in the interpretation of results by the basic pathology, the grouping of tumours for statistical analysis, the use and abuse of historical control data, interpretation of high-dose effects, the use of transgenic animals and the identification of noncarcinogens. Finally, division of the roles of risk assessors and risk managers is outlined. \n \n \nKeywords: \n \ncarcinogen; \ncarcinogenesis; \nchemical; \ndose; \nfalse positive; \ngenotoxic; \nhistorical control; \nmaximum tolerated; \nmetabolism; \nmouse; \nnongenotoxic; \nnoncarcinogen; \noncogene; \npathology; \nrat; \nrisk; \nstatistic; \ntransgenic","PeriodicalId":325382,"journal":{"name":"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carcinogenesis and Carcinogens that are also Genotoxic\",\"authors\":\"D. Mcgregor\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9780470744307.GAT077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The definition of a carcinogen in an experimental context is an agent which increases the incidence of any neoplasm irrespective of whether it is lethal, potentially lethal or benign. As genetic factors are fundamental in carcinogenesis these are briefly reviewed. A description of some of the problems associated with carcinogenicity experiments and the interpretation of their results is presented. Particular emphasis is given to so-called genotoxic carcinogens. ‘So-called’ because there are unresolved difficulties in defining the weight and strength of evidence required for concluding that genotoxicity is indeed the mode of carcinogenic action (MOA), rather than simply concluding that the MOA is unknown. A genotoxic MOA that is based on reactivity with DNA may lead currently to the unverifiable and therefore counter-scientific default assumption that there is no dose without an effect on cancer incidence. Carcinogenicity test design, including the use of the maximum tolerated dose, is briefly discussed. This is followed by consideration of issues and challenges presented in the interpretation of results by the basic pathology, the grouping of tumours for statistical analysis, the use and abuse of historical control data, interpretation of high-dose effects, the use of transgenic animals and the identification of noncarcinogens. Finally, division of the roles of risk assessors and risk managers is outlined. \\n \\n \\nKeywords: \\n \\ncarcinogen; \\ncarcinogenesis; \\nchemical; \\ndose; \\nfalse positive; \\ngenotoxic; \\nhistorical control; \\nmaximum tolerated; \\nmetabolism; \\nmouse; \\nnongenotoxic; \\nnoncarcinogen; \\noncogene; \\npathology; \\nrat; \\nrisk; \\nstatistic; \\ntransgenic\",\"PeriodicalId\":325382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470744307.GAT077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470744307.GAT077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在实验背景下,致癌物的定义是一种能增加任何肿瘤发病率的物质,不管它是致命的、潜在致命的还是良性的。由于遗传因素在癌变中起着重要的作用,本文就这些因素作一简要综述。介绍了与致癌性实验有关的一些问题及其结果的解释。特别强调的是所谓的基因毒性致癌物。“所谓”是因为在确定遗传毒性确实是致癌作用模式(MOA)所需证据的权重和强度方面存在尚未解决的困难,而不是简单地得出MOA未知的结论。基于与DNA反应性的基因毒性MOA目前可能导致一种无法证实的、因此也是反科学的默认假设,即没有剂量不会对癌症发病率产生影响。简要讨论了致癌性试验设计,包括使用最大耐受剂量。其次是考虑基本病理结果解释、肿瘤分类统计分析、历史对照数据的使用和滥用、高剂量效应解释、转基因动物的使用和非致癌物的鉴定等方面提出的问题和挑战。最后,概述了风险评估者和风险管理者的角色划分。关键词:致癌物质;致癌作用;化学;剂量;假阳性;基因毒性;历史上的控制;最大限度的容忍;新陈代谢;鼠标;nongenotoxic;noncarcinogen;癌基因;病理学;大鼠;风险;统计;转基因
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carcinogenesis and Carcinogens that are also Genotoxic
The definition of a carcinogen in an experimental context is an agent which increases the incidence of any neoplasm irrespective of whether it is lethal, potentially lethal or benign. As genetic factors are fundamental in carcinogenesis these are briefly reviewed. A description of some of the problems associated with carcinogenicity experiments and the interpretation of their results is presented. Particular emphasis is given to so-called genotoxic carcinogens. ‘So-called’ because there are unresolved difficulties in defining the weight and strength of evidence required for concluding that genotoxicity is indeed the mode of carcinogenic action (MOA), rather than simply concluding that the MOA is unknown. A genotoxic MOA that is based on reactivity with DNA may lead currently to the unverifiable and therefore counter-scientific default assumption that there is no dose without an effect on cancer incidence. Carcinogenicity test design, including the use of the maximum tolerated dose, is briefly discussed. This is followed by consideration of issues and challenges presented in the interpretation of results by the basic pathology, the grouping of tumours for statistical analysis, the use and abuse of historical control data, interpretation of high-dose effects, the use of transgenic animals and the identification of noncarcinogens. Finally, division of the roles of risk assessors and risk managers is outlined. Keywords: carcinogen; carcinogenesis; chemical; dose; false positive; genotoxic; historical control; maximum tolerated; metabolism; mouse; nongenotoxic; noncarcinogen; oncogene; pathology; rat; risk; statistic; transgenic
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Community-Based Participatory Research/Translational Biomedical Research Strategy for Personalizing Nutrition, Medicine, and Healthcare Chemoinformatics and its Applications Species‐Metabolite Relation Database KNApSAcK and Its Multifaceted Retrieval System, KNApSAcK Family Application of DNA Microarray in Studies of Herbal Dietary Supplements Toxicogenomics: An Overview with Special Reference to Genetic and Genomic Approaches to the Identification of Toxic Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1