{"title":"Prokopovich,真理报和证明:关于《君主真理报》的一些神话","authors":"A. Lentin","doi":"10.15170/spmnnv.2009.05.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Revisiting some conclusions advanced in his 1996 edition of Pravda Voli Monarshei, the author first considers the meaning of 'Pravda' in the title of the work. He then reconsiders the doubts as to its authorship raised by James Cracraft in 1981 in his influential article 'Did Feofan Prokopovich really write Pravda Voli Monarshei?' (Slavic Review, vol. 40, No. 2, pp.173-93). Finally he examines the accepted belief, now current for almost a century, that Hobbes is a source of Pravda Voli Monarshei.","PeriodicalId":391066,"journal":{"name":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","volume":"82 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prokopovich, Pravda and Proof: Some Myths about Pravda Voli Monarshei\",\"authors\":\"A. Lentin\",\"doi\":\"10.15170/spmnnv.2009.05.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Revisiting some conclusions advanced in his 1996 edition of Pravda Voli Monarshei, the author first considers the meaning of 'Pravda' in the title of the work. He then reconsiders the doubts as to its authorship raised by James Cracraft in 1981 in his influential article 'Did Feofan Prokopovich really write Pravda Voli Monarshei?' (Slavic Review, vol. 40, No. 2, pp.173-93). Finally he examines the accepted belief, now current for almost a century, that Hobbes is a source of Pravda Voli Monarshei.\",\"PeriodicalId\":391066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis\",\"volume\":\"82 9\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2009.05.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Specimina Nova Pars Prima Sectio Medaevalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15170/spmnnv.2009.05.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prokopovich, Pravda and Proof: Some Myths about Pravda Voli Monarshei
Revisiting some conclusions advanced in his 1996 edition of Pravda Voli Monarshei, the author first considers the meaning of 'Pravda' in the title of the work. He then reconsiders the doubts as to its authorship raised by James Cracraft in 1981 in his influential article 'Did Feofan Prokopovich really write Pravda Voli Monarshei?' (Slavic Review, vol. 40, No. 2, pp.173-93). Finally he examines the accepted belief, now current for almost a century, that Hobbes is a source of Pravda Voli Monarshei.