精简和整合迈阿密的可持续性三层结果评估

Michael T. Helmick, G. Gannod
{"title":"精简和整合迈阿密的可持续性三层结果评估","authors":"Michael T. Helmick, G. Gannod","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2009.5350473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the challenges associated with implementing an outcomes assessment approach is the institutionalization of a data collection scheme. An assessment methodology that lacks scalability makes it difficult to reasonably collect data on a regular basis. In addition, if the methodology is not integrated with familiar processes, adoption and “faculty buy-in” becomes difficult. Each of these properties (e.g., scalability and integration) addresses a larger concern, namely sustainability. This paper describes a streamlined process for outcomes assessment that is integrated into a course management system. The process involves the use of a three-tier assessment model currently in place at Miami University and supports both indirect and direct assessment through instruments such as surveys, rubrics, and blogging journals.","PeriodicalId":129330,"journal":{"name":"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference","volume":"161 1-4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Streamlining and integration of Miami three-tier outcomes assessment for sustainability\",\"authors\":\"Michael T. Helmick, G. Gannod\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2009.5350473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the challenges associated with implementing an outcomes assessment approach is the institutionalization of a data collection scheme. An assessment methodology that lacks scalability makes it difficult to reasonably collect data on a regular basis. In addition, if the methodology is not integrated with familiar processes, adoption and “faculty buy-in” becomes difficult. Each of these properties (e.g., scalability and integration) addresses a larger concern, namely sustainability. This paper describes a streamlined process for outcomes assessment that is integrated into a course management system. The process involves the use of a three-tier assessment model currently in place at Miami University and supports both indirect and direct assessment through instruments such as surveys, rubrics, and blogging journals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"161 1-4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2009.5350473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

与实施成果评估方法相关的挑战之一是数据收集计划的制度化。缺乏可伸缩性的评估方法很难定期合理地收集数据。此外,如果方法没有与熟悉的流程相结合,采用和“教师支持”就会变得困难。这些属性中的每一个(例如,可伸缩性和集成)都解决了一个更大的问题,即可持续性。本文描述了一个整合到课程管理系统中的成果评估的简化过程。这一过程涉及使用迈阿密大学目前采用的三层评估模型,并通过调查、标准和博客期刊等工具支持间接和直接评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Streamlining and integration of Miami three-tier outcomes assessment for sustainability
Among the challenges associated with implementing an outcomes assessment approach is the institutionalization of a data collection scheme. An assessment methodology that lacks scalability makes it difficult to reasonably collect data on a regular basis. In addition, if the methodology is not integrated with familiar processes, adoption and “faculty buy-in” becomes difficult. Each of these properties (e.g., scalability and integration) addresses a larger concern, namely sustainability. This paper describes a streamlined process for outcomes assessment that is integrated into a course management system. The process involves the use of a three-tier assessment model currently in place at Miami University and supports both indirect and direct assessment through instruments such as surveys, rubrics, and blogging journals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work in progress - use of a system for evaluation of learning and formative feedback in fluid mechanics Special session - developing engineering student's philosophical inquiry skills The business of Service Learning Work in progress: iComb Project - a mathematical widget for teaching and learning combinatorics through exercises Work in progress - integrating energy issues and technologies into an electrical or computer engineering curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1