儒家决定论的悖论:中国知识产权问题的根源追踪[j]。道具。L. 454 (2008)

Wei Shi
{"title":"儒家决定论的悖论:中国知识产权问题的根源追踪[j]。道具。L. 454 (2008)","authors":"Wei Shi","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2024628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to track China’s intellectual property rights (“IPR”) enforcement problem through exploring its fundamental institutional defects that fuels impunity of, or at least fails instilling an ethos hostile to, IPR infringements. By examining China’s philosophical and institutional predisposition, this article argues that counterfeiting and piracy are not problems caused by the Confucian ethics, as the conventional wisdom underscores, but rather, among other things, a unique political phenomenon resulting from the systemic dystrophy fundamental to the institutional development. This article concludes that, to a large extent, the IPR enforcement problems in China are attributed to its unique bureaucracy characterized by the collectivist ideology, decentralized responsibilities, the lack of transparencies and the inadequate judiciary.","PeriodicalId":154356,"journal":{"name":"John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Paradox of Confucian Determinism: Tracking the Root Causes of Intellectual Property Rights Problem in China, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 454 (2008)\",\"authors\":\"Wei Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2024628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article attempts to track China’s intellectual property rights (“IPR”) enforcement problem through exploring its fundamental institutional defects that fuels impunity of, or at least fails instilling an ethos hostile to, IPR infringements. By examining China’s philosophical and institutional predisposition, this article argues that counterfeiting and piracy are not problems caused by the Confucian ethics, as the conventional wisdom underscores, but rather, among other things, a unique political phenomenon resulting from the systemic dystrophy fundamental to the institutional development. This article concludes that, to a large extent, the IPR enforcement problems in China are attributed to its unique bureaucracy characterized by the collectivist ideology, decentralized responsibilities, the lack of transparencies and the inadequate judiciary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2024628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2024628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文试图通过探索中国的基本制度缺陷来追踪中国的知识产权执法问题,这些缺陷助长了对知识产权侵权行为的有罪不罚现象,或者至少未能灌输一种敌视知识产权侵权行为的风气。通过考察中国的哲学和制度倾向,本文认为,仿冒和盗版并非传统观点所强调的儒家伦理所导致的问题,而是一种独特的政治现象,其原因是制度发展的根本系统性营养不良。本文认为,在很大程度上,中国知识产权执法问题的根源在于其独特的官僚体制,其特点是集体主义意识形态、责任分散、缺乏透明度和司法不健全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Paradox of Confucian Determinism: Tracking the Root Causes of Intellectual Property Rights Problem in China, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 454 (2008)
This article attempts to track China’s intellectual property rights (“IPR”) enforcement problem through exploring its fundamental institutional defects that fuels impunity of, or at least fails instilling an ethos hostile to, IPR infringements. By examining China’s philosophical and institutional predisposition, this article argues that counterfeiting and piracy are not problems caused by the Confucian ethics, as the conventional wisdom underscores, but rather, among other things, a unique political phenomenon resulting from the systemic dystrophy fundamental to the institutional development. This article concludes that, to a large extent, the IPR enforcement problems in China are attributed to its unique bureaucracy characterized by the collectivist ideology, decentralized responsibilities, the lack of transparencies and the inadequate judiciary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Go to Jail - Do Not Pass Go, Do Not Pay Civil Damages: The United States’ Hesitation Towards the International Convention on Cybercrime’s Copyright Provisions, 1 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 364 (2002) What Close Cases and Reversals Reveal About Claim Construction at the Federal Circuit, 12 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 583 (2013) Rediscovering Cumulative Creativity From the Oral Formulaic Tradition to Digital Remix: Can I Get a Witness?, 13 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 341 (2014) “There’s a Hole in the Bucket:” The Effective Elimination of the Inequitable Conduct Doctrine,11 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 717 (2012) Patent Claim Construction As a Form of Legal Interpretation, 12 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 40 (2012)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1