初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期与延迟出院的临床结果

Mahrukh Mansoor Khosa, Fizza Mobasher, S. Sehar, Ali Nasir, Aneeqa Ilyas, H. Shoaib
{"title":"初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后早期与延迟出院的临床结果","authors":"Mahrukh Mansoor Khosa, Fizza Mobasher, S. Sehar, Ali Nasir, Aneeqa Ilyas, H. Shoaib","doi":"10.55958/jcvd.v18i4.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Heart disease is the most significant cause of death worldwide and ST- elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a prime cause of death in developing nations. PCI has progressed to the point where overnight monitoring is unnecessary for some patients because of its increased safety and effectiveness. Improved patient satisfaction, shorter hospital stays, and more efficient use of healthcare resources are the key advantages of same-day release following PCI. PCI has always been viewed as an inpatient or short-stay surgery, requiring up to 24 hours of observation time. The purpose of this research was to make comparison of  the outcomes of early and delayed discharge strategy after primary PCI in patients with STEMI and to establish the frequency of early discharge following primary PCI in patients having STEMI. \nMETHODOLOGY: The study was conducted in Cardiology department of Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore from August 10, 2020 to February 10, 2021. Total 200 patients presenting with STEMI were enrolled in the study. Patients underwent primary PCI by a single team with assistance of researcher.  If patients were discharged within 36 hours, then earlier discharge was labeled. Patients were asked to present after 1 month in OPD. Patients were advised to present in case they feel similar symptoms of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure or mortality. The collected data were analysed statistically by using SPSS v25.0. Both groups were compared using chi-square test for clinical outcome. Data were stratified for age, gender, h/o diabetes, hypertension, smoking and duration of symptoms. Post-stratification, both groups were compared by using chi-square test for clinical outcome in each strata. A p-value ?0.05 was taken as significant. \nRESULTS: Total 200 patients presenting with STEMI and underwent primary PCI were enrolled in this study. There were 146(73.0%) were males and 54(27.0%) were females. The mean age of patients was 50.6±19.2 years. Out of 200 patients with STEMI, 86(43.0%) were early discharged and 114(57.0%) had delayed discharged. \nCONCLUSION: This study showed that early discharge is also safe and feasible among patients with STEMI who underwent PCI as compared to delayed discharge. Early discharge may help in lowering down healthcare costs for  Primary PCI service providers","PeriodicalId":227176,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Discharge After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention\",\"authors\":\"Mahrukh Mansoor Khosa, Fizza Mobasher, S. Sehar, Ali Nasir, Aneeqa Ilyas, H. Shoaib\",\"doi\":\"10.55958/jcvd.v18i4.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Heart disease is the most significant cause of death worldwide and ST- elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a prime cause of death in developing nations. PCI has progressed to the point where overnight monitoring is unnecessary for some patients because of its increased safety and effectiveness. Improved patient satisfaction, shorter hospital stays, and more efficient use of healthcare resources are the key advantages of same-day release following PCI. PCI has always been viewed as an inpatient or short-stay surgery, requiring up to 24 hours of observation time. The purpose of this research was to make comparison of  the outcomes of early and delayed discharge strategy after primary PCI in patients with STEMI and to establish the frequency of early discharge following primary PCI in patients having STEMI. \\nMETHODOLOGY: The study was conducted in Cardiology department of Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore from August 10, 2020 to February 10, 2021. Total 200 patients presenting with STEMI were enrolled in the study. Patients underwent primary PCI by a single team with assistance of researcher.  If patients were discharged within 36 hours, then earlier discharge was labeled. Patients were asked to present after 1 month in OPD. Patients were advised to present in case they feel similar symptoms of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure or mortality. The collected data were analysed statistically by using SPSS v25.0. Both groups were compared using chi-square test for clinical outcome. Data were stratified for age, gender, h/o diabetes, hypertension, smoking and duration of symptoms. Post-stratification, both groups were compared by using chi-square test for clinical outcome in each strata. A p-value ?0.05 was taken as significant. \\nRESULTS: Total 200 patients presenting with STEMI and underwent primary PCI were enrolled in this study. There were 146(73.0%) were males and 54(27.0%) were females. The mean age of patients was 50.6±19.2 years. Out of 200 patients with STEMI, 86(43.0%) were early discharged and 114(57.0%) had delayed discharged. \\nCONCLUSION: This study showed that early discharge is also safe and feasible among patients with STEMI who underwent PCI as compared to delayed discharge. Early discharge may help in lowering down healthcare costs for  Primary PCI service providers\",\"PeriodicalId\":227176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55958/jcvd.v18i4.119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55958/jcvd.v18i4.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏病是世界范围内最重要的死亡原因,ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)是发展中国家的主要死亡原因。由于PCI的安全性和有效性的提高,对于一些患者来说,不需要进行夜间监测。提高患者满意度、缩短住院时间和更有效地利用医疗资源是PCI术后当日出院的主要优势。PCI一直被视为住院或短期手术,需要长达24小时的观察时间。本研究的目的是比较STEMI患者初次PCI术后早期和延迟出院策略的结果,并确定STEMI患者初次PCI术后早期出院的频率。方法:本研究于2020年8月10日至2021年2月10日在拉合尔旁遮普省心脏病研究所心内科进行。共有200名STEMI患者参加了这项研究。在研究人员的协助下,患者接受了单一小组的PCI治疗。如果患者在36小时内出院,则标记提前出院。患者被要求在门诊就诊1个月后就诊。建议患者在出现类似心肌梗死、中风、心力衰竭或死亡症状时及时就诊。采用SPSS v25.0软件对收集的数据进行统计学分析。两组临床结果比较采用卡方检验。根据年龄、性别、糖尿病、高血压、吸烟和症状持续时间对数据进行分层。分层后,采用卡方检验比较两组各分层的临床结果。p值0.05为显著性。结果:共有200名STEMI患者接受了首次PCI治疗。其中男性146例(73.0%),女性54例(27.0%)。患者平均年龄50.6±19.2岁。200例STEMI患者中,早期出院86例(43.0%),延迟出院114例(57.0%)。结论:本研究表明,与延迟出院相比,STEMI行PCI的患者早期出院也是安全可行的。早期出院可能有助于降低初级PCI服务提供者的医疗费用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Discharge After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
BACKGROUND: Heart disease is the most significant cause of death worldwide and ST- elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a prime cause of death in developing nations. PCI has progressed to the point where overnight monitoring is unnecessary for some patients because of its increased safety and effectiveness. Improved patient satisfaction, shorter hospital stays, and more efficient use of healthcare resources are the key advantages of same-day release following PCI. PCI has always been viewed as an inpatient or short-stay surgery, requiring up to 24 hours of observation time. The purpose of this research was to make comparison of  the outcomes of early and delayed discharge strategy after primary PCI in patients with STEMI and to establish the frequency of early discharge following primary PCI in patients having STEMI. METHODOLOGY: The study was conducted in Cardiology department of Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore from August 10, 2020 to February 10, 2021. Total 200 patients presenting with STEMI were enrolled in the study. Patients underwent primary PCI by a single team with assistance of researcher.  If patients were discharged within 36 hours, then earlier discharge was labeled. Patients were asked to present after 1 month in OPD. Patients were advised to present in case they feel similar symptoms of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure or mortality. The collected data were analysed statistically by using SPSS v25.0. Both groups were compared using chi-square test for clinical outcome. Data were stratified for age, gender, h/o diabetes, hypertension, smoking and duration of symptoms. Post-stratification, both groups were compared by using chi-square test for clinical outcome in each strata. A p-value ?0.05 was taken as significant. RESULTS: Total 200 patients presenting with STEMI and underwent primary PCI were enrolled in this study. There were 146(73.0%) were males and 54(27.0%) were females. The mean age of patients was 50.6±19.2 years. Out of 200 patients with STEMI, 86(43.0%) were early discharged and 114(57.0%) had delayed discharged. CONCLUSION: This study showed that early discharge is also safe and feasible among patients with STEMI who underwent PCI as compared to delayed discharge. Early discharge may help in lowering down healthcare costs for  Primary PCI service providers
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcomes of Early Versus Delayed Discharge After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Association of fried food consumption with acute coronary syndrome in patients presenting in emergency department Predisposing factors leading to subacute stent thrombosis (SAT) in patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome Case report: Intra arterial thrombolysis with iv line can save an acutely ischemic limb Measuring Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) in male vs female suffering from acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI) at PIC, Lahore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1