“完美”函数评价的可行性

C. Dunham
{"title":"“完美”函数评价的可行性","authors":"C. Dunham","doi":"10.1145/122272.122276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper casts doubt on the feasibility of perfect subroutines or perfect hardware for mathematical functions, in particular by conversion from double precision. It suggests a slightly relaxed standard.","PeriodicalId":177516,"journal":{"name":"ACM Signum Newsletter","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of “perfect” function evaluation\",\"authors\":\"C. Dunham\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/122272.122276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper casts doubt on the feasibility of perfect subroutines or perfect hardware for mathematical functions, in particular by conversion from double precision. It suggests a slightly relaxed standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Signum Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Signum Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/122272.122276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Signum Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/122272.122276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文对数学函数的完美子程序或完美硬件的可行性,特别是对双精度转换的可行性提出了质疑。这表明标准略有放松。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility of “perfect” function evaluation
This paper casts doubt on the feasibility of perfect subroutines or perfect hardware for mathematical functions, in particular by conversion from double precision. It suggests a slightly relaxed standard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Konrad Zuse: reflections on the 80th birthday of the German computing pioneer A comparison of methods for accelerating convergence of Newton's method for multiple polynomial roots Restructuring the BLAS level 1 routine for computing the modified givens transformation Analytic derivation of comparisons in binary search An interactive program to approximate double integrals: an easy to use interface for Cubpack++
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1