Flavius Antoniu Baias, Facultatea de Drept a Universității din București, Valentin Cîlțea
{"title":"Excepția de neexecutare a contractului și dreptul de retenție","authors":"Flavius Antoniu Baias, Facultatea de Drept a Universității din București, Valentin Cîlțea","doi":"10.31178/aubd.2020.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"This study contains a detailed analysis of the Defense of refusal to perform and the Right of retention in the current Civil Code, with reference to the practice of the courts of law and to comparative law issues. Therefore, following the update of the two legal institutions, the present study mirrors the defense of refusal to perform with the right of retention (i.e. legal frame, notion, legal ground, characteristics, application domain, exercise’s conditions, operation’s mechanism, effects and transitional law). Following the examinations of the above-mentioned issues, both legal institutions are compared in order to outline the differences between them. By doing so, the article aims to settle the edge between these two means of judicial defense and to put an end to long debated controversies in the literature and judicial practice. Key-words: Civil Code; favor contractus; the rule of specific performance; the plea of breach of the contract/defense of refusal to perform/right to withhold performance of reciprocal obligation; right of retention; defense; statement of defense; counterclaim; synallagmatic contract; the special effects of synallagmatic contract; remedies for breach of contract; imperfect guarantee\"","PeriodicalId":142426,"journal":{"name":"Analele Universitării din București Drept","volume":"1 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analele Universitării din București Drept","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31178/aubd.2020.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“本研究结合法院的实践和比较法问题,详细分析了现行《民法典》中的拒绝履行抗辩和保留权。因此,在两种法律制度更新的背景下,本研究将拒绝履约抗辩与保留权(法律框架、概念、法律依据、特征、适用领域、行使条件、运行机制、效力和过渡法)相结合。在对上述问题进行审查之后,对这两种法律制度进行比较,以概述它们之间的区别。本文旨在厘清这两种司法抗辩方式之间的界限,结束长期以来在文献和司法实践中存在的争议。关键词:民法典;支持合同;具体履行规则;违约抗辩/拒绝履行抗辩/拒绝履行互惠义务的权利;留置权;防御;辩护陈述书;反诉;双务的合同;联音收缩的特殊效果;违约救济;不完美的保证”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Excepția de neexecutare a contractului și dreptul de retenție
"This study contains a detailed analysis of the Defense of refusal to perform and the Right of retention in the current Civil Code, with reference to the practice of the courts of law and to comparative law issues. Therefore, following the update of the two legal institutions, the present study mirrors the defense of refusal to perform with the right of retention (i.e. legal frame, notion, legal ground, characteristics, application domain, exercise’s conditions, operation’s mechanism, effects and transitional law). Following the examinations of the above-mentioned issues, both legal institutions are compared in order to outline the differences between them. By doing so, the article aims to settle the edge between these two means of judicial defense and to put an end to long debated controversies in the literature and judicial practice. Key-words: Civil Code; favor contractus; the rule of specific performance; the plea of breach of the contract/defense of refusal to perform/right to withhold performance of reciprocal obligation; right of retention; defense; statement of defense; counterclaim; synallagmatic contract; the special effects of synallagmatic contract; remedies for breach of contract; imperfect guarantee"
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nerespectarea hotărârilor judecătorești pronunțate în materia conflictelor de muncă De la o factură de electricitate la supremația dreptului european: astfel s-a născut doctrina Costa c. Enel Convenția de la Lanzarote privită prin prisma unor prevederi din partea specială a Codului penal al Republicii Moldova și din cea a Codului penal al României Tipuri de investigații sub acoperire Dreptul românesc în Basarabia – înainte și după Marea Unire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1