统计模型检查满足基于属性的测试

B. Aichernig, Richard Schumi
{"title":"统计模型检查满足基于属性的测试","authors":"B. Aichernig, Richard Schumi","doi":"10.1109/ICST.2017.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, statistical model checking (SMC) has become increasingly popular, because it scales well to larger stochastic models and is relatively simple to implement. SMC solves the model checking problem by simulating the model for finitely many executions and uses hypothesis testing to infer if the samples provide statistical evidence for or against a property. Being based on simulation and statistics, SMC avoids the state-space explosion problem well-known from other model checking algorithms. In this paper we show how SMC can be easily integrated into a property-based testing framework, like FsCheck for C#. As a result we obtain a very flexible testing and simulation environment, where a programmer can define models and properties in a familiar programming language. The advantages: no external modelling language is needed and both stochastic models and implementations can be checked. In addition, we have access to the powerful test-data generators of a property-based testing tool. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach by repeating three experiments from the SMC literature.","PeriodicalId":112258,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)","volume":"32 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical Model Checking Meets Property-Based Testing\",\"authors\":\"B. Aichernig, Richard Schumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICST.2017.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, statistical model checking (SMC) has become increasingly popular, because it scales well to larger stochastic models and is relatively simple to implement. SMC solves the model checking problem by simulating the model for finitely many executions and uses hypothesis testing to infer if the samples provide statistical evidence for or against a property. Being based on simulation and statistics, SMC avoids the state-space explosion problem well-known from other model checking algorithms. In this paper we show how SMC can be easily integrated into a property-based testing framework, like FsCheck for C#. As a result we obtain a very flexible testing and simulation environment, where a programmer can define models and properties in a familiar programming language. The advantages: no external modelling language is needed and both stochastic models and implementations can be checked. In addition, we have access to the powerful test-data generators of a property-based testing tool. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach by repeating three experiments from the SMC literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2017.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2017.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

近年来,统计模型检查(SMC)因其适用于更大的随机模型且相对简单而越来越受欢迎。SMC通过模拟有限次执行的模型来解决模型检查问题,并使用假设检验来推断样本是否提供了支持或反对某个属性的统计证据。SMC基于仿真和统计,避免了其他模型检查算法中常见的状态空间爆炸问题。在本文中,我们展示了如何将SMC轻松集成到基于属性的测试框架中,比如c#的FsCheck。因此,我们获得了一个非常灵活的测试和模拟环境,程序员可以在其中用熟悉的编程语言定义模型和属性。优点:不需要外部建模语言,随机模型和实现都可以检查。此外,我们还可以访问基于属性的测试工具的强大的测试数据生成器。我们通过重复SMC文献中的三个实验来证明我们方法的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Statistical Model Checking Meets Property-Based Testing
In recent years, statistical model checking (SMC) has become increasingly popular, because it scales well to larger stochastic models and is relatively simple to implement. SMC solves the model checking problem by simulating the model for finitely many executions and uses hypothesis testing to infer if the samples provide statistical evidence for or against a property. Being based on simulation and statistics, SMC avoids the state-space explosion problem well-known from other model checking algorithms. In this paper we show how SMC can be easily integrated into a property-based testing framework, like FsCheck for C#. As a result we obtain a very flexible testing and simulation environment, where a programmer can define models and properties in a familiar programming language. The advantages: no external modelling language is needed and both stochastic models and implementations can be checked. In addition, we have access to the powerful test-data generators of a property-based testing tool. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach by repeating three experiments from the SMC literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Theory of Composite Faults Symbolic Complexity Analysis Using Context-Preserving Histories Using Delta Debugging to Minimize Stress Tests for Concurrent Data Structures Private API Access and Functional Mocking in Automated Unit Test Generation Automata Language Equivalence vs. Simulations for Model-Based Mutant Equivalence: An Empirical Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1