卧卧臂草与紫尾狼尾草混合饲料对青贮性能的联合效应

Alban Mugoti, N. Chikumba, Anderson Munengwa, Lenin Dziwanyika, Sizo Moyo, Chiedza Mgumba
{"title":"卧卧臂草与紫尾狼尾草混合饲料对青贮性能的联合效应","authors":"Alban Mugoti, N. Chikumba, Anderson Munengwa, Lenin Dziwanyika, Sizo Moyo, Chiedza Mgumba","doi":"10.2298/bah2301103m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the association between two\n tropical grasses, Signal grass (Brachiaria decumbens) and Napier grass\n (Pennisetum purpureum) on the proximate composition, in vitro digestibility,\n and fermentation characteristics of ensiled material. A complete randomized\n design was used on three treatments namely Signal grass, Napier grass, and\n Signal-Napier grass combination. Silage was made using molasses applied in\n proportions of 1:2 with water and mixed with silage at the rate of 5% for a\n 5kg bag of 2.5cm cut grass. Signal-Napier grass combination silage was\n superior in almost all parameters to the two sole crop silages. After\n ensiling, a significant difference (p<0.05) in most parameters was recorded.\n A significant difference (p=0.0004) in pH was determined where pH was lower\n in the sole Napier grass silage than that of the Signal-Napier combination\n and Signal grass. A similar outcome (P<0.05) was recorded for crude protein,\n ash, ether extracts, nitrogen-free extracts, and neutral detergent fiber.\n However, no significant difference (p>0.05) was obtained in dry matter\n (p=0.1524), crude fiber (p=0.5924), and ADF (p=0.1168). Although having poor\n digestibility values in all treatments, Signal grass proved to be better\n than the rest. Organoleptic characteristics were promising, with normal\n color, smell, and texture changes observed. These results indicated that the\n association of grasses had an impressive positive effect on the nutritional\n value and quality of silages. Therefore, the use of mixed grass silages is\n encouraged.","PeriodicalId":249404,"journal":{"name":"Biotehnologija u stocarstvu","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associative effects of a mixed Brachiaria decumbens and Pennisetum purpureum grass feed on the ensiling properties\",\"authors\":\"Alban Mugoti, N. Chikumba, Anderson Munengwa, Lenin Dziwanyika, Sizo Moyo, Chiedza Mgumba\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/bah2301103m\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the association between two\\n tropical grasses, Signal grass (Brachiaria decumbens) and Napier grass\\n (Pennisetum purpureum) on the proximate composition, in vitro digestibility,\\n and fermentation characteristics of ensiled material. A complete randomized\\n design was used on three treatments namely Signal grass, Napier grass, and\\n Signal-Napier grass combination. Silage was made using molasses applied in\\n proportions of 1:2 with water and mixed with silage at the rate of 5% for a\\n 5kg bag of 2.5cm cut grass. Signal-Napier grass combination silage was\\n superior in almost all parameters to the two sole crop silages. After\\n ensiling, a significant difference (p<0.05) in most parameters was recorded.\\n A significant difference (p=0.0004) in pH was determined where pH was lower\\n in the sole Napier grass silage than that of the Signal-Napier combination\\n and Signal grass. A similar outcome (P<0.05) was recorded for crude protein,\\n ash, ether extracts, nitrogen-free extracts, and neutral detergent fiber.\\n However, no significant difference (p>0.05) was obtained in dry matter\\n (p=0.1524), crude fiber (p=0.5924), and ADF (p=0.1168). Although having poor\\n digestibility values in all treatments, Signal grass proved to be better\\n than the rest. Organoleptic characteristics were promising, with normal\\n color, smell, and texture changes observed. These results indicated that the\\n association of grasses had an impressive positive effect on the nutritional\\n value and quality of silages. Therefore, the use of mixed grass silages is\\n encouraged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotehnologija u stocarstvu\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotehnologija u stocarstvu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/bah2301103m\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotehnologija u stocarstvu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/bah2301103m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评价信号草(Brachiaria decumbens)和纳匹尔草(Pennisetum purpureum)两种热带牧草的杂交对青贮材料的近似组成、体外消化率和发酵特性的影响。采用完全随机设计,分别对信号草、纳皮尔草和信号-纳皮尔草组合3个处理进行试验。青贮采用糖蜜与水的比例为1:2,以5%的比例混合青贮,每袋5kg割下2.5cm的草。信号-纳匹尔草组合青贮几乎在所有参数上都优于两种单一作物青贮。青贮后干物质(p=0.1524)、粗纤维(p=0.5924)和ADF (p=0.1168)差异显著(p0.05)。虽然所有处理的消化率都较差,但信号草的消化率优于其他处理。感官特征是有希望的,观察到正常的颜色,气味和质地变化。上述结果表明,牧草的配种对青贮饲料的营养价值和品质有显著的积极影响。因此,建议使用混合草料青贮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associative effects of a mixed Brachiaria decumbens and Pennisetum purpureum grass feed on the ensiling properties
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the association between two tropical grasses, Signal grass (Brachiaria decumbens) and Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) on the proximate composition, in vitro digestibility, and fermentation characteristics of ensiled material. A complete randomized design was used on three treatments namely Signal grass, Napier grass, and Signal-Napier grass combination. Silage was made using molasses applied in proportions of 1:2 with water and mixed with silage at the rate of 5% for a 5kg bag of 2.5cm cut grass. Signal-Napier grass combination silage was superior in almost all parameters to the two sole crop silages. After ensiling, a significant difference (p<0.05) in most parameters was recorded. A significant difference (p=0.0004) in pH was determined where pH was lower in the sole Napier grass silage than that of the Signal-Napier combination and Signal grass. A similar outcome (P<0.05) was recorded for crude protein, ash, ether extracts, nitrogen-free extracts, and neutral detergent fiber. However, no significant difference (p>0.05) was obtained in dry matter (p=0.1524), crude fiber (p=0.5924), and ADF (p=0.1168). Although having poor digestibility values in all treatments, Signal grass proved to be better than the rest. Organoleptic characteristics were promising, with normal color, smell, and texture changes observed. These results indicated that the association of grasses had an impressive positive effect on the nutritional value and quality of silages. Therefore, the use of mixed grass silages is encouraged.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of fish meal in the nutrition of weaned piglets Contents of sodium-chloride in various groups of locally manufactured meat Estimation of growth traits heritability coefficients in sheep Phenotypic correlation of traits of production and reproduction of Simmental cows in different regions of Serbia Study of fattening and slaughter traits of cattle under the influence of flax seed based nutrition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1