用于通信的数字混沌电路的定量比较

Alan J. Michaels
{"title":"用于通信的数字混沌电路的定量比较","authors":"Alan J. Michaels","doi":"10.1109/INDS.2011.6024835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chaotic spread spectrum communication systems are sought after for their high levels of security, derived from the apparent randomness of the underlying chaotic spreading signal. Traditionally this “randomness” is quantified by the use of Lyupanov exponent(s) that give rates of chaotic state divergence, for continuous-time chaotic circuits. The downside of such continuous-time analog chaotic systems is that they are difficult to synchronize, leading to reduced channel capacity via re-synchronization overhead or compromises in security. These chaotic signals also possess colored spectra, leading to detection and channel utilization disadvantages. Discrete-time and — amplitude systems are simpler to implement, yet more difficult to quantify their “chaotic-ness;” the rate of state divergence is dependent on both computational precision and sampling intervals in sequence generation. Moreover, the existence of a well-defined chaotic attractor is evidence of a failure to meet the desired maximal entropy signal characteristic required for maximum channel capacity throughput. This paper presents comparative simulation measures quantifying the underlying randomness and computational sensitivities for a collection of digital chaotic mappings, qualifying their suitability for use in secure communication systems. Under most measures, the tent map and the logistic map fail to meet the needed performance. The skew tent mapping is found to be better, yet techniques for closed field calculations are found to be superior, without a significant increase in computational resources.","PeriodicalId":117809,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Joint INDS'11 & ISTET'11","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative comparisons of digital chaotic circuits for use in communications\",\"authors\":\"Alan J. Michaels\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INDS.2011.6024835\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chaotic spread spectrum communication systems are sought after for their high levels of security, derived from the apparent randomness of the underlying chaotic spreading signal. Traditionally this “randomness” is quantified by the use of Lyupanov exponent(s) that give rates of chaotic state divergence, for continuous-time chaotic circuits. The downside of such continuous-time analog chaotic systems is that they are difficult to synchronize, leading to reduced channel capacity via re-synchronization overhead or compromises in security. These chaotic signals also possess colored spectra, leading to detection and channel utilization disadvantages. Discrete-time and — amplitude systems are simpler to implement, yet more difficult to quantify their “chaotic-ness;” the rate of state divergence is dependent on both computational precision and sampling intervals in sequence generation. Moreover, the existence of a well-defined chaotic attractor is evidence of a failure to meet the desired maximal entropy signal characteristic required for maximum channel capacity throughput. This paper presents comparative simulation measures quantifying the underlying randomness and computational sensitivities for a collection of digital chaotic mappings, qualifying their suitability for use in secure communication systems. Under most measures, the tent map and the logistic map fail to meet the needed performance. The skew tent mapping is found to be better, yet techniques for closed field calculations are found to be superior, without a significant increase in computational resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Joint INDS'11 & ISTET'11\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Joint INDS'11 & ISTET'11\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDS.2011.6024835\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Joint INDS'11 & ISTET'11","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDS.2011.6024835","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

混沌扩频通信系统由于其高安全性而受到人们的追捧,这种安全性来源于底层混沌扩频信号的表观随机性。传统上,对于连续时间混沌电路,这种“随机性”是通过使用给出混沌状态发散率的Lyupanov指数来量化的。这种连续时间模拟混沌系统的缺点是它们难以同步,导致通过重新同步开销减少信道容量或危及安全性。这些混沌信号还具有彩色光谱,导致检测和信道利用的缺点。离散时间和振幅系统更容易实现,但更难以量化它们的“混沌性”;状态发散率依赖于序列生成中的计算精度和采样间隔。此外,一个定义良好的混沌吸引子的存在是不能满足最大信道容量吞吐量所需的最大熵信号特性的证据。本文提出了比较模拟措施量化潜在的随机性和计算灵敏度的数字混沌映射的集合,合格的适合使用在保密通信系统。在大多数措施下,帐篷地图和后勤地图无法满足所需的性能。斜帐篷映射被认为是更好的,而封闭场计算的技术被认为是优越的,没有显著增加计算资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantitative comparisons of digital chaotic circuits for use in communications
Chaotic spread spectrum communication systems are sought after for their high levels of security, derived from the apparent randomness of the underlying chaotic spreading signal. Traditionally this “randomness” is quantified by the use of Lyupanov exponent(s) that give rates of chaotic state divergence, for continuous-time chaotic circuits. The downside of such continuous-time analog chaotic systems is that they are difficult to synchronize, leading to reduced channel capacity via re-synchronization overhead or compromises in security. These chaotic signals also possess colored spectra, leading to detection and channel utilization disadvantages. Discrete-time and — amplitude systems are simpler to implement, yet more difficult to quantify their “chaotic-ness;” the rate of state divergence is dependent on both computational precision and sampling intervals in sequence generation. Moreover, the existence of a well-defined chaotic attractor is evidence of a failure to meet the desired maximal entropy signal characteristic required for maximum channel capacity throughput. This paper presents comparative simulation measures quantifying the underlying randomness and computational sensitivities for a collection of digital chaotic mappings, qualifying their suitability for use in secure communication systems. Under most measures, the tent map and the logistic map fail to meet the needed performance. The skew tent mapping is found to be better, yet techniques for closed field calculations are found to be superior, without a significant increase in computational resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantitative comparisons of digital chaotic circuits for use in communications Study of PM10 pollution using signal analysis methods Constant switching frequency techniques for sliding mode control in DC-DC converters Geometrical interpretation of jump phenomena in nonlinear dynamical circuits Stability analysis of recurrent neural networks with time-varying activation functions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1