家用生物质炉灶性能测试方案的主要差异

Yixiang Zhang, Crispin Pernberton-Piqott, Zongxi Zhang, H. Ding, Yuguang Zhou, R. Dong
{"title":"家用生物质炉灶性能测试方案的主要差异","authors":"Yixiang Zhang, Crispin Pernberton-Piqott, Zongxi Zhang, H. Ding, Yuguang Zhou, R. Dong","doi":"10.1109/DUE.2014.6827753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, different ways of testing household biomass cooking stoves are compared and analyzed. The differences between test methods relate to the stove operation and data analysis methods, the fueling procedure, the end point selection, the choice of metrics and others factors. The influences of these differences were analyzed by using an induction heater. The results show the use of a pot lid or not, and the selection of the end point of the test have the greatest influence on the rated performance. Consequently test results provided by laboratories using different test methods will place the same stove-plus-fuel combination on significantly different performance `tiers'. Also the results show some metrics in popular tests should be reviewed. Some recommendations are provided for improving the accuracy and repeatability of test procedures and select metrics are defined for greater clarity.","PeriodicalId":112427,"journal":{"name":"Twenty-Second Domestic Use of Energy","volume":"45 Suppl 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key differences of performance test protocols for household biomass cookstoves\",\"authors\":\"Yixiang Zhang, Crispin Pernberton-Piqott, Zongxi Zhang, H. Ding, Yuguang Zhou, R. Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DUE.2014.6827753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, different ways of testing household biomass cooking stoves are compared and analyzed. The differences between test methods relate to the stove operation and data analysis methods, the fueling procedure, the end point selection, the choice of metrics and others factors. The influences of these differences were analyzed by using an induction heater. The results show the use of a pot lid or not, and the selection of the end point of the test have the greatest influence on the rated performance. Consequently test results provided by laboratories using different test methods will place the same stove-plus-fuel combination on significantly different performance `tiers'. Also the results show some metrics in popular tests should be reviewed. Some recommendations are provided for improving the accuracy and repeatability of test procedures and select metrics are defined for greater clarity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Twenty-Second Domestic Use of Energy\",\"volume\":\"45 Suppl 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Twenty-Second Domestic Use of Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DUE.2014.6827753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twenty-Second Domestic Use of Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DUE.2014.6827753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究对家用生物质炉灶的不同检测方法进行了比较和分析。试验方法之间的差异涉及炉子操作和数据分析方法、加油程序、终点选择、指标选择和其他因素。利用感应加热器对这些差异的影响进行了分析。结果表明,是否使用锅盖,以及试验终点的选择对额定性能的影响最大。因此,使用不同测试方法的实验室提供的测试结果将把相同的炉子加燃料组合置于显著不同的性能“等级”上。结果还表明,应该对流行测试中的一些指标进行审查。为提高测试过程的准确性和可重复性提供了一些建议,并为更清晰地定义了选择度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Key differences of performance test protocols for household biomass cookstoves
In this study, different ways of testing household biomass cooking stoves are compared and analyzed. The differences between test methods relate to the stove operation and data analysis methods, the fueling procedure, the end point selection, the choice of metrics and others factors. The influences of these differences were analyzed by using an induction heater. The results show the use of a pot lid or not, and the selection of the end point of the test have the greatest influence on the rated performance. Consequently test results provided by laboratories using different test methods will place the same stove-plus-fuel combination on significantly different performance `tiers'. Also the results show some metrics in popular tests should be reviewed. Some recommendations are provided for improving the accuracy and repeatability of test procedures and select metrics are defined for greater clarity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Domestic load research data collection using Open Data Kit Key differences of performance test protocols for household biomass cookstoves Domestic building density estimates for network planning A prototype thermoelectric co-generation unit The energy profile of a low-income urban community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1