{"title":"影响分析——建立一个比较框架","authors":"R. Arnold, S. Bohner","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.1993.366933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term impact analysis is used with many meanings. A three-part framework for characterizing and comparing diverse impact analysis approaches is defined. The parts correspond to how an approach is used to accomplish impact analysis, how an approach does impact analysis internally, and the effectiveness of the impact analysis approach. To illustrate the framework's application, five impact analysis approaches are illustrated according to it.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":228379,"journal":{"name":"1993 Conference on Software Maintenance","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"309","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact analysis-Towards a framework for comparison\",\"authors\":\"R. Arnold, S. Bohner\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSM.1993.366933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The term impact analysis is used with many meanings. A three-part framework for characterizing and comparing diverse impact analysis approaches is defined. The parts correspond to how an approach is used to accomplish impact analysis, how an approach does impact analysis internally, and the effectiveness of the impact analysis approach. To illustrate the framework's application, five impact analysis approaches are illustrated according to it.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":228379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1993 Conference on Software Maintenance\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"309\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1993 Conference on Software Maintenance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.1993.366933\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1993 Conference on Software Maintenance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.1993.366933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact analysis-Towards a framework for comparison
The term impact analysis is used with many meanings. A three-part framework for characterizing and comparing diverse impact analysis approaches is defined. The parts correspond to how an approach is used to accomplish impact analysis, how an approach does impact analysis internally, and the effectiveness of the impact analysis approach. To illustrate the framework's application, five impact analysis approaches are illustrated according to it.<>
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
