UML静态对象图的经验评估

Marco Torchiano
{"title":"UML静态对象图的经验评估","authors":"Marco Torchiano","doi":"10.1109/WPC.2004.1311064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essential UML logic diagrams are the class diagrams: they represent the classes of objects that make up a program. Object diagrams are used as the basis to show scenarios of dynamic evolution of the software. The use of object diagrams to depict static structure is very rare. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the use of static object diagrams can improve the comprehension of software systems. We conducted a study with 17 graduate students during a software engineering course. The students were asked to answer questions about a software system. The system was described either with a class diagram or with both a class diagram and an object diagram. The student asked multiple choice questions on four different systems. This study revealed that there is a statistically significant difference in the comprehension achievement for two of the systems. The effect of the presence of object diagrams can be classified of medium size. These results allow us to formulate new research questions that guide our future work in this area.","PeriodicalId":164866,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension, 2004.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical assessment of UML static object diagrams\",\"authors\":\"Marco Torchiano\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WPC.2004.1311064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essential UML logic diagrams are the class diagrams: they represent the classes of objects that make up a program. Object diagrams are used as the basis to show scenarios of dynamic evolution of the software. The use of object diagrams to depict static structure is very rare. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the use of static object diagrams can improve the comprehension of software systems. We conducted a study with 17 graduate students during a software engineering course. The students were asked to answer questions about a software system. The system was described either with a class diagram or with both a class diagram and an object diagram. The student asked multiple choice questions on four different systems. This study revealed that there is a statistically significant difference in the comprehension achievement for two of the systems. The effect of the presence of object diagrams can be classified of medium size. These results allow us to formulate new research questions that guide our future work in this area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension, 2004.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension, 2004.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WPC.2004.1311064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 12th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WPC.2004.1311064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

基本的UML逻辑图是类图:它们表示组成程序的对象的类。对象图是显示软件动态演化场景的基础。使用对象图来描述静态结构是非常罕见的。本研究的目的是探讨静态对象图的使用是否可以提高对软件系统的理解。我们在软件工程课程中与17名研究生进行了一项研究。学生们被要求回答有关软件系统的问题。该系统要么用类图来描述,要么用类图和对象图来描述。这名学生在四个不同的系统上做了多项选择题。本研究发现,两个系统的理解成绩有统计学上的显著差异。对象图存在的效果可以分为中等大小。这些结果使我们能够提出新的研究问题,指导我们在这一领域的未来工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empirical assessment of UML static object diagrams
The essential UML logic diagrams are the class diagrams: they represent the classes of objects that make up a program. Object diagrams are used as the basis to show scenarios of dynamic evolution of the software. The use of object diagrams to depict static structure is very rare. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the use of static object diagrams can improve the comprehension of software systems. We conducted a study with 17 graduate students during a software engineering course. The students were asked to answer questions about a software system. The system was described either with a class diagram or with both a class diagram and an object diagram. The student asked multiple choice questions on four different systems. This study revealed that there is a statistically significant difference in the comprehension achievement for two of the systems. The effect of the presence of object diagrams can be classified of medium size. These results allow us to formulate new research questions that guide our future work in this area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empirical assessment of UML static object diagrams Program comprehension for Web services An empirical study on using stereotypes to improve understanding of UML models Program comprehension in generative programming: a history of grand challenges Structural evolution of an open source system: a case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1