Flow-rack AS/RS中基于全流动率策略的性能评价

Meng Zhao, Zhuxi Chen
{"title":"Flow-rack AS/RS中基于全流动率策略的性能评价","authors":"Meng Zhao, Zhuxi Chen","doi":"10.1145/3424978.3425143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a flow-rack AS/RS, unit-loads to be stored slide from the storage face to the retrieval face driven by the gravity, which lets stored unit-loads follow the first-in-first-out rule in each bin. Consequently, a requested unit-load might be blocked by blocking unit-loads stored in front of it. Blocking unit-loads require extra cost to be removed and restored before retrieving requested ones. Full turnover-based (FTB) storage policy can be employed in flow-rack AS/RS, in which each bin contains the same type of unit-loads to ensure the avoidance of blocking unit-loads when systems request a unit-load. In this paper, the performance of FTB policy is evaluated for the flow-rack AS/RS, which is compared to the in-deep storage policy. Because in-deep storage policy takes a lot of time to deal with blocking unit-loads, we can see whether FTB policy without blocking unit-loads performs better than in-deep storage policy with the same external conditions.","PeriodicalId":178822,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of Full Turnover-based Policy in the Flow-rack AS/RS\",\"authors\":\"Meng Zhao, Zhuxi Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3424978.3425143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a flow-rack AS/RS, unit-loads to be stored slide from the storage face to the retrieval face driven by the gravity, which lets stored unit-loads follow the first-in-first-out rule in each bin. Consequently, a requested unit-load might be blocked by blocking unit-loads stored in front of it. Blocking unit-loads require extra cost to be removed and restored before retrieving requested ones. Full turnover-based (FTB) storage policy can be employed in flow-rack AS/RS, in which each bin contains the same type of unit-loads to ensure the avoidance of blocking unit-loads when systems request a unit-load. In this paper, the performance of FTB policy is evaluated for the flow-rack AS/RS, which is compared to the in-deep storage policy. Because in-deep storage policy takes a lot of time to deal with blocking unit-loads, we can see whether FTB policy without blocking unit-loads performs better than in-deep storage policy with the same external conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3424978.3425143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3424978.3425143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在流架AS/RS中,被存储的单元负载在重力的驱动下从存储面滑动到检索面,这使得存储的单元负载在每个仓中遵循先进先出的规则。因此,请求的单元加载可能会被存储在它前面的单元加载阻塞。阻塞的单元负载需要在检索请求的单元负载之前移除和恢复额外的成本。在流机架AS/RS中可以采用基于全周转的存储策略,其中每个仓包含相同类型的单元负载,以确保当系统请求单元负载时避免阻塞单元负载。本文对流机架AS/RS的FTB策略进行了性能评价,并与深度存储策略进行了比较。由于深度存储策略处理阻塞单元负载需要花费大量时间,因此我们可以看到在相同外部条件下,不阻塞单元负载的FTB策略是否比深度存储策略性能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Evaluation of Full Turnover-based Policy in the Flow-rack AS/RS
In a flow-rack AS/RS, unit-loads to be stored slide from the storage face to the retrieval face driven by the gravity, which lets stored unit-loads follow the first-in-first-out rule in each bin. Consequently, a requested unit-load might be blocked by blocking unit-loads stored in front of it. Blocking unit-loads require extra cost to be removed and restored before retrieving requested ones. Full turnover-based (FTB) storage policy can be employed in flow-rack AS/RS, in which each bin contains the same type of unit-loads to ensure the avoidance of blocking unit-loads when systems request a unit-load. In this paper, the performance of FTB policy is evaluated for the flow-rack AS/RS, which is compared to the in-deep storage policy. Because in-deep storage policy takes a lot of time to deal with blocking unit-loads, we can see whether FTB policy without blocking unit-loads performs better than in-deep storage policy with the same external conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study on Improved Algorithm of RSSI Correction and Location in Mine-well Based on Bluetooth Positioning Information Distributed Predefined-time Consensus Tracking Protocol for Multi-agent Systems Evaluation Method Study of Blog's Subject Influence and User's Subject Influence Performance Evaluation of Full Turnover-based Policy in the Flow-rack AS/RS A Hybrid Encoding Based Particle Swarm Optimizer for Feature Selection and Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1