课堂考试程序与学生焦虑。

G. Barger
{"title":"课堂考试程序与学生焦虑。","authors":"G. Barger","doi":"10.1080/00193089.1983.10533792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An attempt to reduce test anxiety was made by pro viding increased information to students a out the types of questions likely to appear on end-of-unit ex aminations. Two experimental testing formats, and a combination of the two, were compared with the typical practice of providing no supplemental information. The experimental formats were as follows: (1) During the class session prior to the test, a copy of a previous test, given to a class in an earlier semester but covering the same content, was given to each student. Students were told that similar, but not identical, questions could be expected on the upcoming test. (2) Students were of fered two opportunities to be tested over the same course unit at consecutive class sessions. They were re quired to take one, although they could take both, of the tests. Their score of record would be the better of the two scores on the tests. The tests contained com pletely different sets of questions, but did cover the same unit of study. Table 1 summarizes the testing design as it was employed over a full year's classes in Introductory Sociology. Each testing condition was used at least three times during the year. For example, the combination of experimental formats, (t)TT, was employed with Unit 1 for both of the Fall 1981 classes, with Unit 2 for the","PeriodicalId":126898,"journal":{"name":"Improving College and University Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classroom Testing Procedures and Student Anxiety.\",\"authors\":\"G. Barger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00193089.1983.10533792\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An attempt to reduce test anxiety was made by pro viding increased information to students a out the types of questions likely to appear on end-of-unit ex aminations. Two experimental testing formats, and a combination of the two, were compared with the typical practice of providing no supplemental information. The experimental formats were as follows: (1) During the class session prior to the test, a copy of a previous test, given to a class in an earlier semester but covering the same content, was given to each student. Students were told that similar, but not identical, questions could be expected on the upcoming test. (2) Students were of fered two opportunities to be tested over the same course unit at consecutive class sessions. They were re quired to take one, although they could take both, of the tests. Their score of record would be the better of the two scores on the tests. The tests contained com pletely different sets of questions, but did cover the same unit of study. Table 1 summarizes the testing design as it was employed over a full year's classes in Introductory Sociology. Each testing condition was used at least three times during the year. For example, the combination of experimental formats, (t)TT, was employed with Unit 1 for both of the Fall 1981 classes, with Unit 2 for the\",\"PeriodicalId\":126898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Improving College and University Teaching\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Improving College and University Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1983.10533792\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Improving College and University Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1983.10533792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

为了减少考试焦虑,他们向学生提供了更多的信息,告诉他们期末考试中可能出现的问题类型。将两种实验测试格式以及两者的组合与不提供补充信息的典型做法进行比较。实验形式如下:(1)在测试前的课堂上,给每个学生一份上一学期的测试的副本,但内容相同。学生们被告知,在即将到来的考试中,可能会出现类似但不完全相同的问题。(2)学生有两次机会在同一课程单元的连续课堂上进行测试。他们被要求参加一项测试,尽管他们可以参加两项测试。他们的记录分数将是两个测试分数中较好的一个。这些测试包含了完全不同的问题集,但涵盖了相同的学习单元。表1总结了测试设计,因为它是在社会学入门课程中使用的。每个测试条件在一年中至少使用了三次。例如,实验形式的组合,(t)TT,在1981年秋季课程的第一单元中使用,在第二单元中使用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Classroom Testing Procedures and Student Anxiety.
An attempt to reduce test anxiety was made by pro viding increased information to students a out the types of questions likely to appear on end-of-unit ex aminations. Two experimental testing formats, and a combination of the two, were compared with the typical practice of providing no supplemental information. The experimental formats were as follows: (1) During the class session prior to the test, a copy of a previous test, given to a class in an earlier semester but covering the same content, was given to each student. Students were told that similar, but not identical, questions could be expected on the upcoming test. (2) Students were of fered two opportunities to be tested over the same course unit at consecutive class sessions. They were re quired to take one, although they could take both, of the tests. Their score of record would be the better of the two scores on the tests. The tests contained com pletely different sets of questions, but did cover the same unit of study. Table 1 summarizes the testing design as it was employed over a full year's classes in Introductory Sociology. Each testing condition was used at least three times during the year. For example, the combination of experimental formats, (t)TT, was employed with Unit 1 for both of the Fall 1981 classes, with Unit 2 for the
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accommodating the Remedial Student in the Content Class Teaching Political Theory: Meaning through Metaphor Responding to Students: Ughs, Awks, and Ahas Responding to Industry: Writing in a High Tech World. Promoting Professional and Personal Renewal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1