代际差异的方法论方面:以确定俄罗斯千禧一代的营养态度为例

E. Tkachenko
{"title":"代际差异的方法论方面:以确定俄罗斯千禧一代的营养态度为例","authors":"E. Tkachenko","doi":"10.19181/4m.2021.52.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the description of the original method of generational differences analysis. This method is called the maximum differentiation scheme. With the help of the scheme we investigated unique trends in the millennial generation (born 1982–2000), which were observed neither in the entire sample nor in the other two generations for three types of data collection methods (cross-sectional analysis, analysis of temporal changes and long-term analysis). To satisfy the mechanics of the scheme, in addition to millennials, the Soviet generation (born 1947–1967) and the reform generation (born 1968–1981) were used for systematic comparisons. The research was conducted using data from the Russian Target Group Index. Thanks to the scheme, the author showed that only the statement “I prefer vegetarian food” can be considered a truly characteristic attitude of millennials. However, the scheme has two important limitations: 1) it is not sensitive to trends that are not unique to a particular generation; 2) the scheme cannot be used as the only type of analysis and needs additional methodological procedures. Taking into account these limitations, the maximum differentiation scheme can be useful both as a unique type of preliminary analysis of generational differences, and included in a broader approach to working with age and period effects.","PeriodicalId":271863,"journal":{"name":"Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M)","volume":"143 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological aspects of generational differentiation: on the example of determining nutritional attitudes of Russian millennials\",\"authors\":\"E. Tkachenko\",\"doi\":\"10.19181/4m.2021.52.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the description of the original method of generational differences analysis. This method is called the maximum differentiation scheme. With the help of the scheme we investigated unique trends in the millennial generation (born 1982–2000), which were observed neither in the entire sample nor in the other two generations for three types of data collection methods (cross-sectional analysis, analysis of temporal changes and long-term analysis). To satisfy the mechanics of the scheme, in addition to millennials, the Soviet generation (born 1947–1967) and the reform generation (born 1968–1981) were used for systematic comparisons. The research was conducted using data from the Russian Target Group Index. Thanks to the scheme, the author showed that only the statement “I prefer vegetarian food” can be considered a truly characteristic attitude of millennials. However, the scheme has two important limitations: 1) it is not sensitive to trends that are not unique to a particular generation; 2) the scheme cannot be used as the only type of analysis and needs additional methodological procedures. Taking into account these limitations, the maximum differentiation scheme can be useful both as a unique type of preliminary analysis of generational differences, and included in a broader approach to working with age and period effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M)\",\"volume\":\"143 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19181/4m.2021.52.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/4m.2021.52.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对代际差异分析的原始方法进行了描述。这种方法称为最大微分格式。在该方案的帮助下,我们研究了千禧一代(1982-2000年出生)的独特趋势,这些趋势既没有在整个样本中观察到,也没有在其他两代人中观察到,采用了三种类型的数据收集方法(横断面分析、时间变化分析和长期分析)。为了满足该方案的机制,除了千禧一代,苏联一代(生于1947-1967年)和改革一代(生于1968-1981年)被用于系统比较。这项研究使用了俄罗斯目标群体指数(Russian Target Group Index)的数据。通过这个方案,作者证明了只有“我更喜欢素食”这句话才能被认为是千禧一代真正具有特色的态度。然而,该方案有两个重要的局限性:1)它对非特定世代独有的趋势不敏感;2)该方案不能作为唯一的分析类型,需要额外的方法学程序。考虑到这些限制,最大差异方案既可以作为代际差异的一种独特的初步分析,也可以纳入研究年龄和时期影响的更广泛的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methodological aspects of generational differentiation: on the example of determining nutritional attitudes of Russian millennials
The article is devoted to the description of the original method of generational differences analysis. This method is called the maximum differentiation scheme. With the help of the scheme we investigated unique trends in the millennial generation (born 1982–2000), which were observed neither in the entire sample nor in the other two generations for three types of data collection methods (cross-sectional analysis, analysis of temporal changes and long-term analysis). To satisfy the mechanics of the scheme, in addition to millennials, the Soviet generation (born 1947–1967) and the reform generation (born 1968–1981) were used for systematic comparisons. The research was conducted using data from the Russian Target Group Index. Thanks to the scheme, the author showed that only the statement “I prefer vegetarian food” can be considered a truly characteristic attitude of millennials. However, the scheme has two important limitations: 1) it is not sensitive to trends that are not unique to a particular generation; 2) the scheme cannot be used as the only type of analysis and needs additional methodological procedures. Taking into account these limitations, the maximum differentiation scheme can be useful both as a unique type of preliminary analysis of generational differences, and included in a broader approach to working with age and period effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Qualitative social network analysis in practice: comparison of methods for network maps construction Experience of implementing discourse analysis and conceptual mapping of healthy eating communities Typology of professional trajectories of gifted individuals using neural network analysis Topic modeling for short texts: comparative analysis of algorithms Comparative analysis of the capabilities of WoS and eLibrary for analyzing bibliographic networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1