美国武器系统维护与优化的自然语言处理与分类方法

Nicola Bruno, Tommy Jun, Henry Tessier
{"title":"美国武器系统维护与优化的自然语言处理与分类方法","authors":"Nicola Bruno, Tommy Jun, Henry Tessier","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Logistics Management Institute (LMI) works with the US Department of Defense (DoD) in analyzing maintenance logs on US weapons systems. A major issue in processing this data is determining how to extract useful information from disorganized short-form texts in order to optimize the maintenance of these systems. Unlike text from other corpora, these text entries are only a few words in length and do not conform to lexical convention. LMI has provided a subset of about 10 million of these maintenance logs, each labeled with action-object pairs. The goals of this research are to construct a model that predicts action-object pairs and provide a metric to assess its validity. Prior to analysis, the entries are vectorized by either TFIDF and TSVD, or Word2vec. Several models are applied, including logistic regression, k-NN, SVM, decision trees, LSA, and DBSCAN clustering. Unsupervised models are tested in addition to supervised models due to the ambiguity regarding the validity of the provided ground truth values. The results of these tests yield accuracy scores of about 0.53 for action words and 0.73 for object words. Furthermore, the results from clustering provides evidence for discrepancies in the ground truth values. Taking this into consideration, prior models are adjusted and accuracy scores increased to 0.78 for action words.","PeriodicalId":265421,"journal":{"name":"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural Language Processing and Classification Methods for the Maintenance and Optimization of US Weapon Systems\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Bruno, Tommy Jun, Henry Tessier\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Logistics Management Institute (LMI) works with the US Department of Defense (DoD) in analyzing maintenance logs on US weapons systems. A major issue in processing this data is determining how to extract useful information from disorganized short-form texts in order to optimize the maintenance of these systems. Unlike text from other corpora, these text entries are only a few words in length and do not conform to lexical convention. LMI has provided a subset of about 10 million of these maintenance logs, each labeled with action-object pairs. The goals of this research are to construct a model that predicts action-object pairs and provide a metric to assess its validity. Prior to analysis, the entries are vectorized by either TFIDF and TSVD, or Word2vec. Several models are applied, including logistic regression, k-NN, SVM, decision trees, LSA, and DBSCAN clustering. Unsupervised models are tested in addition to supervised models due to the ambiguity regarding the validity of the provided ground truth values. The results of these tests yield accuracy scores of about 0.53 for action words and 0.73 for object words. Furthermore, the results from clustering provides evidence for discrepancies in the ground truth values. Taking this into consideration, prior models are adjusted and accuracy scores increased to 0.78 for action words.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS.2019.8735587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

后勤管理研究所(LMI)与美国国防部(DoD)合作分析美国武器系统的维护日志。处理这些数据的一个主要问题是确定如何从杂乱无章的短格式文本中提取有用的信息,以优化这些系统的维护。与其他语料库中的文本不同,这些文本条目只有几个单词的长度,并且不符合词汇惯例。LMI提供了大约1000万个维护日志的子集,每个日志都标有操作-对象对。本研究的目的是建立一个预测动作-对象对的模型,并提供一个评估其有效性的指标。在分析之前,条目通过TFIDF和TSVD或Word2vec进行矢量化。应用了几种模型,包括逻辑回归、k-NN、支持向量机、决策树、LSA和DBSCAN聚类。由于所提供的基础真值的有效性存在歧义,除了对有监督模型进行测试外,还对无监督模型进行测试。这些测试的结果为动作词的准确度得分约为0.53,目标词的准确度得分约为0.73。此外,聚类的结果为基础真值的差异提供了证据。考虑到这一点,对之前的模型进行了调整,动作词的准确率得分提高到0.78。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Natural Language Processing and Classification Methods for the Maintenance and Optimization of US Weapon Systems
The Logistics Management Institute (LMI) works with the US Department of Defense (DoD) in analyzing maintenance logs on US weapons systems. A major issue in processing this data is determining how to extract useful information from disorganized short-form texts in order to optimize the maintenance of these systems. Unlike text from other corpora, these text entries are only a few words in length and do not conform to lexical convention. LMI has provided a subset of about 10 million of these maintenance logs, each labeled with action-object pairs. The goals of this research are to construct a model that predicts action-object pairs and provide a metric to assess its validity. Prior to analysis, the entries are vectorized by either TFIDF and TSVD, or Word2vec. Several models are applied, including logistic regression, k-NN, SVM, decision trees, LSA, and DBSCAN clustering. Unsupervised models are tested in addition to supervised models due to the ambiguity regarding the validity of the provided ground truth values. The results of these tests yield accuracy scores of about 0.53 for action words and 0.73 for object words. Furthermore, the results from clustering provides evidence for discrepancies in the ground truth values. Taking this into consideration, prior models are adjusted and accuracy scores increased to 0.78 for action words.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things in the Transformation of E-Business Sector Gamification of eHealth Interventions to Increase User Engagement and Reduce Attrition Modeling User Context from Smartphone Data for Recognition of Health Status Developing a data pipeline to improve accessibility and utilization of Charlottesville's Open Data Portal Deep Learning for Detecting Diseases in Gastrointestinal Biopsy Images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1