Еffectiveness保护租赁协议双方的权利

D. Polnyi
{"title":"Еffectiveness保护租赁协议双方的权利","authors":"D. Polnyi","doi":"10.15330/apiclu.55.33-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the concept of measures to protect the rights of the parties of lease agreement. It is stated that in case of violation, non-recognition or challenge of the rights of lease agreement, the person against whom the illegal act was committed has the right to defend his rights independently or seek protection from one of the authorized bodies. It is emphasized that protection consists of measures of various nature. \nThe author proved that the effectiveness of protection depends on the correctly chosen method of protection and proof of the circumstances to which the person points. It is proved that it is important to set the right goal of personal protection and choose measures aimed at achieving this goal. These arguments are confirmed by judicial practice and scientific doctrine. \nIt is argued that non-jurisdictional safety methods, in particular self-defense, measures of operational influence, may be applied if they are provided or prohibited by law and are sufficient. Also jurisdictional safety methods must be applied when enforcement is required, or safety methods must be applied only by an authorized body. \nBased on the analysis of judicial practice, the criteria for the effectiveness of safety methods are established and the limits of application of safety methods are determined. Measures of judicial protection of the rights of the parties of the lease agreement has been studied. \nIt is concluded that the limits of application of the method of protection are reflected in the legality, objectivity of application, depend on the existence of appropriate grounds and conditions, the nature of the violation, non-recognition, challenge.","PeriodicalId":196689,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Еffectiveness Of Protection The Rights Of The Parties Of Lease Agreement\",\"authors\":\"D. Polnyi\",\"doi\":\"10.15330/apiclu.55.33-44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper deals with the concept of measures to protect the rights of the parties of lease agreement. It is stated that in case of violation, non-recognition or challenge of the rights of lease agreement, the person against whom the illegal act was committed has the right to defend his rights independently or seek protection from one of the authorized bodies. It is emphasized that protection consists of measures of various nature. \\nThe author proved that the effectiveness of protection depends on the correctly chosen method of protection and proof of the circumstances to which the person points. It is proved that it is important to set the right goal of personal protection and choose measures aimed at achieving this goal. These arguments are confirmed by judicial practice and scientific doctrine. \\nIt is argued that non-jurisdictional safety methods, in particular self-defense, measures of operational influence, may be applied if they are provided or prohibited by law and are sufficient. Also jurisdictional safety methods must be applied when enforcement is required, or safety methods must be applied only by an authorized body. \\nBased on the analysis of judicial practice, the criteria for the effectiveness of safety methods are established and the limits of application of safety methods are determined. Measures of judicial protection of the rights of the parties of the lease agreement has been studied. \\nIt is concluded that the limits of application of the method of protection are reflected in the legality, objectivity of application, depend on the existence of appropriate grounds and conditions, the nature of the violation, non-recognition, challenge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.55.33-44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.55.33-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了租赁合同当事人权利保护措施的概念。有人指出,在违反、不承认或质疑租赁协议权利的情况下,遭受非法行为侵害的人有权独立捍卫其权利或向授权机构之一寻求保护。它强调,保护包括各种性质的措施。作者论证了保护的有效性取决于正确选择保护方法和举证当事人所指出的情况。实践证明,确立正确的人身保护目标和选择实现这一目标的措施是十分重要的。这些观点为司法实践和科学理论所证实。有人认为,如果法律规定或禁止非管辖权的安全方法,特别是自卫和具有行动影响的措施,并且这些方法足够充分,则可以适用。此外,当需要强制执行时,必须应用管辖安全方法,或者安全方法必须仅由授权机构应用。在分析司法实践的基础上,确立了安全方法有效性的标准,确定了安全方法的适用范围。对租赁合同当事人权利的司法保护措施进行了研究。结论认为,保护方法适用的限制体现在合法性、适用的客观性、是否存在适当的理由和条件、侵犯的性质、不承认、质疑等方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Еffectiveness Of Protection The Rights Of The Parties Of Lease Agreement
The paper deals with the concept of measures to protect the rights of the parties of lease agreement. It is stated that in case of violation, non-recognition or challenge of the rights of lease agreement, the person against whom the illegal act was committed has the right to defend his rights independently or seek protection from one of the authorized bodies. It is emphasized that protection consists of measures of various nature. The author proved that the effectiveness of protection depends on the correctly chosen method of protection and proof of the circumstances to which the person points. It is proved that it is important to set the right goal of personal protection and choose measures aimed at achieving this goal. These arguments are confirmed by judicial practice and scientific doctrine. It is argued that non-jurisdictional safety methods, in particular self-defense, measures of operational influence, may be applied if they are provided or prohibited by law and are sufficient. Also jurisdictional safety methods must be applied when enforcement is required, or safety methods must be applied only by an authorized body. Based on the analysis of judicial practice, the criteria for the effectiveness of safety methods are established and the limits of application of safety methods are determined. Measures of judicial protection of the rights of the parties of the lease agreement has been studied. It is concluded that the limits of application of the method of protection are reflected in the legality, objectivity of application, depend on the existence of appropriate grounds and conditions, the nature of the violation, non-recognition, challenge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidential activity of the court in civil and administrative proceedings: a comparative legal analysis The influence of jurisprudence of international treaty bodies on the interpretation of international treaties Administrative and legal mechanisms for ensuring the safety of the educational process in the conditions of martial law in Ukraine Simplified proceedings in the civil procedure of Poland Consideration of family cases by the court according to the rules of simplified litigation: a review of judicial practice and trends of change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1