初中阶段不同教育程度的CLIL学生语用能力:以请求语为例

Nashwa Nashaat Sobhy
{"title":"初中阶段不同教育程度的CLIL学生语用能力:以请求语为例","authors":"Nashwa Nashaat Sobhy","doi":"10.1163/9789004409699_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares the requests of secondary school learners (12 to 16 years old) in four different levels of compulsory education in a CLIL program (Content and Language Integrated Learning). The study explores whether the degree of directness of their requests and their use of external and internal modifiers differ from one educational level to the other. A total of 228 students participated in the study. They produced a total of 399 requests which were elicited by means of a written discourse completion task. The requests were analyzed using a data-driven taxonomy, informed by earlier ones (Blum-Kulka et al, 1989; Alcon-Soler et al, 2005). Qualitative and quantitative data showed that the oldest group of the four CLIL levels has access to a wider repertoire of request modification devices and strategies, but which do not necessarily guarantee the students’ ability to mitigate requests.","PeriodicalId":266449,"journal":{"name":"Investigating the Learning of Pragmatics across Ages and Contexts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pragmatic Competence of CLIL Students across Different Educational Levels in Secondary Stage: The Case of Requests\",\"authors\":\"Nashwa Nashaat Sobhy\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004409699_005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study compares the requests of secondary school learners (12 to 16 years old) in four different levels of compulsory education in a CLIL program (Content and Language Integrated Learning). The study explores whether the degree of directness of their requests and their use of external and internal modifiers differ from one educational level to the other. A total of 228 students participated in the study. They produced a total of 399 requests which were elicited by means of a written discourse completion task. The requests were analyzed using a data-driven taxonomy, informed by earlier ones (Blum-Kulka et al, 1989; Alcon-Soler et al, 2005). Qualitative and quantitative data showed that the oldest group of the four CLIL levels has access to a wider repertoire of request modification devices and strategies, but which do not necessarily guarantee the students’ ability to mitigate requests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":266449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigating the Learning of Pragmatics across Ages and Contexts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigating the Learning of Pragmatics across Ages and Contexts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004409699_005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigating the Learning of Pragmatics across Ages and Contexts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004409699_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究比较了四种不同阶段义务教育阶段中学生(12至16岁)对CLIL课程(内容与语言综合学习)的要求。该研究探讨了不同教育水平的学生在要求的直接程度以及使用外部和内部修饰语方面是否存在差异。共有228名学生参与了这项研究。他们总共提出了399个请求,这些请求是通过书面话语完成任务引起的。使用数据驱动分类法分析这些请求,该分类法由早期的请求提供信息(Blum-Kulka et al, 1989;Alcon-Soler等人,2005)。定性和定量数据表明,在四个CLIL水平中,年龄最大的一组可以使用更广泛的请求修改设备和策略,但这并不一定保证学生减轻请求的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Pragmatic Competence of CLIL Students across Different Educational Levels in Secondary Stage: The Case of Requests
This study compares the requests of secondary school learners (12 to 16 years old) in four different levels of compulsory education in a CLIL program (Content and Language Integrated Learning). The study explores whether the degree of directness of their requests and their use of external and internal modifiers differ from one educational level to the other. A total of 228 students participated in the study. They produced a total of 399 requests which were elicited by means of a written discourse completion task. The requests were analyzed using a data-driven taxonomy, informed by earlier ones (Blum-Kulka et al, 1989; Alcon-Soler et al, 2005). Qualitative and quantitative data showed that the oldest group of the four CLIL levels has access to a wider repertoire of request modification devices and strategies, but which do not necessarily guarantee the students’ ability to mitigate requests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Teacher Talk for Very Young Language Learners Pragmatically Tuned? Directives in Two EAL Classrooms The Pragmatic Competence of CLIL Students across Different Educational Levels in Secondary Stage: The Case of Requests Speech Act Acquisition in Instructed Pragmatics: Advanced EFL Learners’ Patterns of Downgrading and Upgrading in Disagreements Student-to-Faculty Email Consultation in English, Spanish and Catalan in an Academic Context Exploring Case Stories in the Development of Textual Discourse-Pragmatic Markers in Formal English Language Classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1