荟萃分析:SSRIs与CBT联合治疗青少年抑郁症的有效性

Gabriele Mustika Kresnia, Winda Hasuki, Nanda Rizqia Pradana Ratnasari
{"title":"荟萃分析:SSRIs与CBT联合治疗青少年抑郁症的有效性","authors":"Gabriele Mustika Kresnia, Winda Hasuki, Nanda Rizqia Pradana Ratnasari","doi":"10.54250/IJLS.V2I1.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nObjective: To compare the efficacy of SSRI medication alone and SSRI+CBT combined. \nMethods: NCBI Pubmed, DARE, CSDR and NGC were searched October-November 2019. The population size, as well as the base and endpoint CGAS mean and standard deviation from the three studies included, are recorded. Statistical analysis was done in RStudio with the \"meta\" package. \nResults: For the SSRI only, the effect size was -1.82 with a 95% confidence interval between -2.28 and -1.37.  For the SSRI and CBT combined, the effect size was -1.68 with a 95% confidence interval between -2.39 and -0.98. The effect size for both SSRI and SSRI + CBT didn't cross the null effect line, but the heterogeneity exceeds 50%. The result for the comparison of post SSRI vs. SSRI + CBT showed the effect size of -0.05 with a 95% confidence interval between -0.23 and 0.12. The size effect did cross the null effect line, but the heterogeneity was less than 50%. \nConclusion: Both methods were shown to be effective. However, due to statistical inconsistencies, it couldn’t be concluded whether the combination of SSRI and CBT is better than treatment with SSRI alone.","PeriodicalId":375737,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Life Sciences | ISSN: 2656-0682 (online)","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-Analysis: Effectiveness of SSRIs vs SSRIs in conjunction with CBT in treating depression in young adolescents\",\"authors\":\"Gabriele Mustika Kresnia, Winda Hasuki, Nanda Rizqia Pradana Ratnasari\",\"doi\":\"10.54250/IJLS.V2I1.35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"  \\nObjective: To compare the efficacy of SSRI medication alone and SSRI+CBT combined. \\nMethods: NCBI Pubmed, DARE, CSDR and NGC were searched October-November 2019. The population size, as well as the base and endpoint CGAS mean and standard deviation from the three studies included, are recorded. Statistical analysis was done in RStudio with the \\\"meta\\\" package. \\nResults: For the SSRI only, the effect size was -1.82 with a 95% confidence interval between -2.28 and -1.37.  For the SSRI and CBT combined, the effect size was -1.68 with a 95% confidence interval between -2.39 and -0.98. The effect size for both SSRI and SSRI + CBT didn't cross the null effect line, but the heterogeneity exceeds 50%. The result for the comparison of post SSRI vs. SSRI + CBT showed the effect size of -0.05 with a 95% confidence interval between -0.23 and 0.12. The size effect did cross the null effect line, but the heterogeneity was less than 50%. \\nConclusion: Both methods were shown to be effective. However, due to statistical inconsistencies, it couldn’t be concluded whether the combination of SSRI and CBT is better than treatment with SSRI alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Life Sciences | ISSN: 2656-0682 (online)\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Life Sciences | ISSN: 2656-0682 (online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54250/IJLS.V2I1.35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Life Sciences | ISSN: 2656-0682 (online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54250/IJLS.V2I1.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较SSRI单独用药与SSRI+CBT联合用药的疗效。方法:检索2019年10 - 11月NCBI Pubmed、DARE、CSDR和NGC。记录纳入的三个研究的总体规模,以及基数和终点CGAS平均值和标准差。统计分析是在RStudio中使用“meta”包完成的。结果:仅对于SSRI,效应量为-1.82,95%置信区间为-2.28 ~ -1.37。对于SSRI和CBT联合治疗,效应量为-1.68,95%置信区间为-2.39 ~ -0.98。SSRI和SSRI + CBT的效应量均未越过无效线,但异质性超过50%。SSRI后与SSRI + CBT的比较结果显示,效应量为-0.05,95%置信区间为-0.23 ~ 0.12。大小效应确实跨越了零效应线,但异质性小于50%。结论:两种方法均有效。然而,由于统计上的不一致,无法得出SSRI与CBT联合治疗是否优于单独使用SSRI治疗的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meta-Analysis: Effectiveness of SSRIs vs SSRIs in conjunction with CBT in treating depression in young adolescents
  Objective: To compare the efficacy of SSRI medication alone and SSRI+CBT combined. Methods: NCBI Pubmed, DARE, CSDR and NGC were searched October-November 2019. The population size, as well as the base and endpoint CGAS mean and standard deviation from the three studies included, are recorded. Statistical analysis was done in RStudio with the "meta" package. Results: For the SSRI only, the effect size was -1.82 with a 95% confidence interval between -2.28 and -1.37.  For the SSRI and CBT combined, the effect size was -1.68 with a 95% confidence interval between -2.39 and -0.98. The effect size for both SSRI and SSRI + CBT didn't cross the null effect line, but the heterogeneity exceeds 50%. The result for the comparison of post SSRI vs. SSRI + CBT showed the effect size of -0.05 with a 95% confidence interval between -0.23 and 0.12. The size effect did cross the null effect line, but the heterogeneity was less than 50%. Conclusion: Both methods were shown to be effective. However, due to statistical inconsistencies, it couldn’t be concluded whether the combination of SSRI and CBT is better than treatment with SSRI alone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The aspartate metabolism pathway In silico investigation of bioactive compounds from Ginkgo biloba as alternatives to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs A Review on Bioethanol Production through the Valorization of Food Waste in Indonesia A Review on Pharmacological Activity of Monarda fistulosa L. The Influence of Macronutrient Intake towards Intestinal Mucus Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1