宪法管辖权的公开性和透明度

T. Sacchetto
{"title":"宪法管辖权的公开性和透明度","authors":"T. Sacchetto","doi":"10.18593/EJJL.13758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract : The innovation carried out by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court to allow the mass media to transmit live and integrally part of their judging sessions has divided opinions regarding virtuosity or the devaluation of the practice in a way that does not exist until then a minimum of theoretical consensus on its suitability. Due to the legal characteristics and the normative effects of certain judgments given by the constitutional courts in the judicial review of normative acts, it is understood that the establishment of widely publicized and transparent regimes is genuinely a real elementary duty of States in the 21st century. Keywords : Constitutional jurisdiction. State duties. Publicity and transparency. Right of access to information.","PeriodicalId":206661,"journal":{"name":"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law","volume":"341 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Publicidade e transparência na jurisdição constitucional\",\"authors\":\"T. Sacchetto\",\"doi\":\"10.18593/EJJL.13758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract : The innovation carried out by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court to allow the mass media to transmit live and integrally part of their judging sessions has divided opinions regarding virtuosity or the devaluation of the practice in a way that does not exist until then a minimum of theoretical consensus on its suitability. Due to the legal characteristics and the normative effects of certain judgments given by the constitutional courts in the judicial review of normative acts, it is understood that the establishment of widely publicized and transparent regimes is genuinely a real elementary duty of States in the 21st century. Keywords : Constitutional jurisdiction. State duties. Publicity and transparency. Right of access to information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law\",\"volume\":\"341 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18593/EJJL.13758\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18593/EJJL.13758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:巴西联邦最高法院进行了一项创新,允许大众媒体直播并完整地转播其审判过程的一部分,这一创新在精湛技艺或实践贬值方面存在分歧,直到那时才存在关于其适用性的最低限度理论共识。由于宪法法院在规范行为的司法审查中作出的某些判决的法律特征和规范效果,我们可以理解,建立广泛公开和透明的制度是21世纪各国真正的基本义务。关键词:宪法管辖;国家的职责。公开和透明。获取信息的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Publicidade e transparência na jurisdição constitucional
Abstract : The innovation carried out by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court to allow the mass media to transmit live and integrally part of their judging sessions has divided opinions regarding virtuosity or the devaluation of the practice in a way that does not exist until then a minimum of theoretical consensus on its suitability. Due to the legal characteristics and the normative effects of certain judgments given by the constitutional courts in the judicial review of normative acts, it is understood that the establishment of widely publicized and transparent regimes is genuinely a real elementary duty of States in the 21st century. Keywords : Constitutional jurisdiction. State duties. Publicity and transparency. Right of access to information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EDITORAÇÃO, CULTURA CIENTÍFICA NO BRASIL E OS 20 ANOS DA EJJL O direito fundamental a tratamento não discriminatório como limite para a extinção do contrato de emprego da pessoa com doença geradora de estigma ou preconceito Cuidado e direitos fundamentais: o caso do habeas corpus coletivo para pais e responsáveis por crianças e pessoas com deficiência Los derechos de la naturaleza: un paso adelante, tres atrás O debate entre Mart Suzi (IBF) e Robert Alexy (WF), organizado na obra proporcionalidade e internet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1