跨越世界观进行调解

Jeffrey R. Seul
{"title":"跨越世界观进行调解","authors":"Jeffrey R. Seul","doi":"10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781529208191.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter considers the ways in which liberal institutions and approaches to peace mediation are inadequate for conflicts rooted in competing worldviews. Many of the most persistent and challenging conflicts are, and always have been, propelled by contending worldviews and their normative dictates. Yet peace mediation processes seem inadequately attuned to the drivers of such conflicts, and unresponsive to the core motivations and aspirations of conflict stakeholders. As a result, the default mechanisms, practices and mindsets that have been relied upon for decades in efforts to manage and resolve violent intra state and international conflict, including common modes of peace mediation, may no longer be fully up to the task. The chapter highlights this failure and proposes a strategy for peace mediation practice to engage in a more meaningful way with this tension.","PeriodicalId":179616,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Peace Mediation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mediating Across Worldviews\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey R. Seul\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781529208191.003.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter considers the ways in which liberal institutions and approaches to peace mediation are inadequate for conflicts rooted in competing worldviews. Many of the most persistent and challenging conflicts are, and always have been, propelled by contending worldviews and their normative dictates. Yet peace mediation processes seem inadequately attuned to the drivers of such conflicts, and unresponsive to the core motivations and aspirations of conflict stakeholders. As a result, the default mechanisms, practices and mindsets that have been relied upon for decades in efforts to manage and resolve violent intra state and international conflict, including common modes of peace mediation, may no longer be fully up to the task. The chapter highlights this failure and proposes a strategy for peace mediation practice to engage in a more meaningful way with this tension.\",\"PeriodicalId\":179616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Peace Mediation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Peace Mediation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781529208191.003.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Peace Mediation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781529208191.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本章探讨了自由主义制度和和平调解方法在解决根植于相互竞争的世界观的冲突中的不足之处。许多最持久和最具挑战性的冲突都是,而且一直是由相互冲突的世界观及其规范所推动的。然而,和平调解进程似乎没有充分适应此类冲突的驱动因素,也没有回应冲突利益攸关方的核心动机和愿望。因此,几十年来在管理和解决国家内部暴力和国际冲突的努力中所依赖的默认机制、做法和思维方式,包括常见的和平调解模式,可能不再完全胜任这项任务。本章强调了这一失败,并提出了和平调解实践的策略,以更有意义的方式参与这种紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mediating Across Worldviews
This chapter considers the ways in which liberal institutions and approaches to peace mediation are inadequate for conflicts rooted in competing worldviews. Many of the most persistent and challenging conflicts are, and always have been, propelled by contending worldviews and their normative dictates. Yet peace mediation processes seem inadequately attuned to the drivers of such conflicts, and unresponsive to the core motivations and aspirations of conflict stakeholders. As a result, the default mechanisms, practices and mindsets that have been relied upon for decades in efforts to manage and resolve violent intra state and international conflict, including common modes of peace mediation, may no longer be fully up to the task. The chapter highlights this failure and proposes a strategy for peace mediation practice to engage in a more meaningful way with this tension.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Emulation of Peace Mediation Practices: Mediating Across Worldviews Rethinking Peace Mediation: Towards a More Integrated Approach? Cooperation Among the UN, AU and IGAD in Mediation Support The Business of Peace and the Politics of Inclusion:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1