预防性双侧输卵管切除术对阴道子宫切除术妇女卵巢储备的影响:一项随机对照试验

A. Nassif, M. A. Elnory
{"title":"预防性双侧输卵管切除术对阴道子宫切除术妇女卵巢储备的影响:一项随机对照试验","authors":"A. Nassif, M. A. Elnory","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2020.22949.1074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy (BOS) in premenopausal women has any detrimental effect on ovarian reserve (OR) and if this increases surgical consequences in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy (VH)/Non-Descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH).Materials and Methods: This prospective, open-label, randomized, multisite, parallel group, concealed allocation, superiority trial was conducted at Benha University Hospital (BUH), and two private centers in El-Qalubia, Egypt, From September 2015 to September 2017. 110 women undergoing VH/NDVH were allocated to adding BOS (intervention group) or not (control group) at 1 : 1 ratio. The primary outcomes were differences in change of serum Anti-mullerian hormone (ΔAMH), serum follicular stimulating hormone (ΔFSH), antral follicular count (ΔAFC), flow index (ΔFI) vascularization index (Δ VI), vascularization flow index (Δ VFI) and calculated ovarian age with OvAge (Δ OvAge), measured preoperatively and at 6 to 8 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes as well as the feasibility of performing BOS at VH/NDVH and hospital stay.Results: Baseline demographic, clinical, hormonal and three-dimensional ultrasound characteristics did not show significant differences between both groups according to both intention to treat (ITT) analysis as well as per protocol (PP) analysis. Also, the groups did not differ significantly regarding operative outcomes such as operative time, operative bleeding and hospital stay according to ITT and PP analyses. The BOS was surgically feasible in 95% (58/61) of tried cases. In both groups the postoperative AMH, AFC, VI, FI, VFI were decreased, while FSH, OvAge were increased. There were no statistically significant differences between intervention and control groups according to ITT as well as PP analyses regarding Δ AMH (P = 0.17), Δ FSH (P = 0.11), ΔAFC (P = 0.07), Δ VI (P = 0.82), Δ FI (P = 0.94),ΔVFI 9 (P = 0.96) and Δ OaAge (P = 0.78).Conclusion: Performing bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy at time of vaginal hysterectomy / Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy did not have a detrimental effect on ovarian reserve as well as surgical consequences when compared with a policy of performing hysterectomy alone. So adding BOS as ovarian cancer risk-reducing surgery appears to be a safe procedure in average OvCa risk premenopausal women undergoing VH/NDVH for benign gynecological indications.","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"A. Nassif, M. A. Elnory\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/ebwhj.2020.22949.1074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy (BOS) in premenopausal women has any detrimental effect on ovarian reserve (OR) and if this increases surgical consequences in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy (VH)/Non-Descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH).Materials and Methods: This prospective, open-label, randomized, multisite, parallel group, concealed allocation, superiority trial was conducted at Benha University Hospital (BUH), and two private centers in El-Qalubia, Egypt, From September 2015 to September 2017. 110 women undergoing VH/NDVH were allocated to adding BOS (intervention group) or not (control group) at 1 : 1 ratio. The primary outcomes were differences in change of serum Anti-mullerian hormone (ΔAMH), serum follicular stimulating hormone (ΔFSH), antral follicular count (ΔAFC), flow index (ΔFI) vascularization index (Δ VI), vascularization flow index (Δ VFI) and calculated ovarian age with OvAge (Δ OvAge), measured preoperatively and at 6 to 8 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes as well as the feasibility of performing BOS at VH/NDVH and hospital stay.Results: Baseline demographic, clinical, hormonal and three-dimensional ultrasound characteristics did not show significant differences between both groups according to both intention to treat (ITT) analysis as well as per protocol (PP) analysis. Also, the groups did not differ significantly regarding operative outcomes such as operative time, operative bleeding and hospital stay according to ITT and PP analyses. The BOS was surgically feasible in 95% (58/61) of tried cases. In both groups the postoperative AMH, AFC, VI, FI, VFI were decreased, while FSH, OvAge were increased. There were no statistically significant differences between intervention and control groups according to ITT as well as PP analyses regarding Δ AMH (P = 0.17), Δ FSH (P = 0.11), ΔAFC (P = 0.07), Δ VI (P = 0.82), Δ FI (P = 0.94),ΔVFI 9 (P = 0.96) and Δ OaAge (P = 0.78).Conclusion: Performing bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy at time of vaginal hysterectomy / Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy did not have a detrimental effect on ovarian reserve as well as surgical consequences when compared with a policy of performing hysterectomy alone. So adding BOS as ovarian cancer risk-reducing surgery appears to be a safe procedure in average OvCa risk premenopausal women undergoing VH/NDVH for benign gynecological indications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2020.22949.1074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2020.22949.1074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估绝经前妇女双侧机会性输卵管切除术(BOS)是否对卵巢储备(OR)有任何不利影响,以及这是否会增加阴道子宫切除术(VH)/非遗传阴道子宫切除术(NDVH)妇女的手术后果。材料与方法:该前瞻性、开放标签、随机、多地点、平行组、隐蔽分配、优势试验于2015年9月至2017年9月在埃及El-Qalubia的Benha大学医院(BUH)和两个私立中心进行。将110例VH/NDVH患者按1:1的比例分为加BOS组(干预组)和不加BOS组(对照组)。主要结局为术前及术后6 ~ 8个月测定血清抗苗勒管激素(ΔAMH)、血清促卵泡激素(ΔFSH)、窦腔卵泡计数(ΔAFC)、血流指数(ΔFI)、血管形成指数(Δ VI)、血管形成指数(Δ VFI)及卵巢年龄计算(Δ OvAge)的变化差异。次要结果是手术结果以及在VH/NDVH和住院期间进行BOS的可行性。结果:根据治疗意向分析(ITT)和方案分析(PP),两组患者的基线人口学、临床、激素和三维超声特征均无显著差异。此外,根据ITT和PP分析,两组在手术结果(如手术时间、手术出血和住院时间)方面没有显着差异。95%(58/61)的试验病例手术可行。两组术后AMH、AFC、VI、FI、VFI均降低,FSH、OvAge均升高。干预组与对照组在Δ AMH (P = 0.17)、Δ FSH (P = 0.11)、ΔAFC (P = 0.07)、Δ VI (P = 0.82)、Δ FI (P = 0.94)、ΔVFI 9 (P = 0.96)、Δ OaAge (P = 0.78)方面的ITT及PP分析差异均无统计学意义。结论:与单独行子宫切除术相比,阴道子宫切除术/非下降阴道子宫切除术同时行双侧机会性输卵管切除术对卵巢储备和手术后果没有不利影响。因此,对于因良性妇科指征而接受VH/NDVH治疗的平均OvCa风险绝经前妇女来说,将BOS作为降低卵巢癌风险的手术似乎是一种安全的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial
Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy (BOS) in premenopausal women has any detrimental effect on ovarian reserve (OR) and if this increases surgical consequences in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy (VH)/Non-Descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH).Materials and Methods: This prospective, open-label, randomized, multisite, parallel group, concealed allocation, superiority trial was conducted at Benha University Hospital (BUH), and two private centers in El-Qalubia, Egypt, From September 2015 to September 2017. 110 women undergoing VH/NDVH were allocated to adding BOS (intervention group) or not (control group) at 1 : 1 ratio. The primary outcomes were differences in change of serum Anti-mullerian hormone (ΔAMH), serum follicular stimulating hormone (ΔFSH), antral follicular count (ΔAFC), flow index (ΔFI) vascularization index (Δ VI), vascularization flow index (Δ VFI) and calculated ovarian age with OvAge (Δ OvAge), measured preoperatively and at 6 to 8 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes as well as the feasibility of performing BOS at VH/NDVH and hospital stay.Results: Baseline demographic, clinical, hormonal and three-dimensional ultrasound characteristics did not show significant differences between both groups according to both intention to treat (ITT) analysis as well as per protocol (PP) analysis. Also, the groups did not differ significantly regarding operative outcomes such as operative time, operative bleeding and hospital stay according to ITT and PP analyses. The BOS was surgically feasible in 95% (58/61) of tried cases. In both groups the postoperative AMH, AFC, VI, FI, VFI were decreased, while FSH, OvAge were increased. There were no statistically significant differences between intervention and control groups according to ITT as well as PP analyses regarding Δ AMH (P = 0.17), Δ FSH (P = 0.11), ΔAFC (P = 0.07), Δ VI (P = 0.82), Δ FI (P = 0.94),ΔVFI 9 (P = 0.96) and Δ OaAge (P = 0.78).Conclusion: Performing bilateral opportunistic salpingectomy at time of vaginal hysterectomy / Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy did not have a detrimental effect on ovarian reserve as well as surgical consequences when compared with a policy of performing hysterectomy alone. So adding BOS as ovarian cancer risk-reducing surgery appears to be a safe procedure in average OvCa risk premenopausal women undergoing VH/NDVH for benign gynecological indications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hysteroscopy as a diagnostic tool in women with recurrent pregnancy loss, a prospective randomized controlled study Serum Soluble Endoglin Versus Serum Placental Growth Factor for Early Prediction of Preeclampsia Cervical cerclage for Pregnant Women at High-risk of Recurrent Preterm Birth can act beyond its Mechanical Action New ultrasound signs for prediction of early placental Insufficiency Efficacy and Safety of Preoperative Intravenous Tranexamic Acid to Reduce Blood Loss During and After Elective Lower‐Segment Cesarean Delivery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1