谓词逻辑中设计模式的形式化

Ian Bayley
{"title":"谓词逻辑中设计模式的形式化","authors":"Ian Bayley","doi":"10.1109/SEFM.2007.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design patterns are traditionally outlined in an informal manner. If they could be formalised, we could derive tools that automatically recognise design patterns and refactor designs and code. Our approach is to deploy predicate logic to specify conditions on the class diagrams that describe design patterns. The structure of class diagrams is itself described with a novel meta-notation that can be used for defining any graphical modelling language. As a result, the constraints, while based on UML, are highly readable and have much expressive power. This enables us not only to recognise design patterns in legacy code, but also to reason about them at the design stage, such as showing one pattern to be a special case of another. The paper discusses our specification of the original 23 design patterns and presents a representative sample of some of them.","PeriodicalId":212544,"journal":{"name":"Fifth IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2007)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formalising Design Patterns in Predicate Logic\",\"authors\":\"Ian Bayley\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEFM.2007.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Design patterns are traditionally outlined in an informal manner. If they could be formalised, we could derive tools that automatically recognise design patterns and refactor designs and code. Our approach is to deploy predicate logic to specify conditions on the class diagrams that describe design patterns. The structure of class diagrams is itself described with a novel meta-notation that can be used for defining any graphical modelling language. As a result, the constraints, while based on UML, are highly readable and have much expressive power. This enables us not only to recognise design patterns in legacy code, but also to reason about them at the design stage, such as showing one pattern to be a special case of another. The paper discusses our specification of the original 23 design patterns and presents a representative sample of some of them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fifth IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2007)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fifth IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEFM.2007.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifth IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEFM.2007.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

摘要

传统上,设计模式是以一种非正式的方式概述的。如果它们可以形式化,我们就可以获得自动识别设计模式并重构设计和代码的工具。我们的方法是部署谓词逻辑来指定描述设计模式的类图上的条件。类图的结构本身是用一种新颖的元符号来描述的,这种元符号可以用来定义任何图形化建模语言。因此,约束虽然是基于UML的,但具有很高的可读性和表达能力。这使我们不仅能够识别遗留代码中的设计模式,而且还能够在设计阶段对它们进行推理,例如将一个模式显示为另一个模式的特殊情况。本文讨论了我们对最初的23种设计模式的规范,并给出了其中一些有代表性的示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Formalising Design Patterns in Predicate Logic
Design patterns are traditionally outlined in an informal manner. If they could be formalised, we could derive tools that automatically recognise design patterns and refactor designs and code. Our approach is to deploy predicate logic to specify conditions on the class diagrams that describe design patterns. The structure of class diagrams is itself described with a novel meta-notation that can be used for defining any graphical modelling language. As a result, the constraints, while based on UML, are highly readable and have much expressive power. This enables us not only to recognise design patterns in legacy code, but also to reason about them at the design stage, such as showing one pattern to be a special case of another. The paper discusses our specification of the original 23 design patterns and presents a representative sample of some of them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Testing conformance on Stochastic Stream X-Machines The Role of Abstract Interpretation in Formal Methods Specification-based testing for refinement Hardness for Explicit State Software Model Checking Benchmarks Formalising Design Patterns in Predicate Logic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1