紧缩、经济脆弱性和民粹主义

Leonardo Baccini, T. Sattler
{"title":"紧缩、经济脆弱性和民粹主义","authors":"Leonardo Baccini, T. Sattler","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3766022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Governments have repeatedly adjusted fiscal policy during the past decades. We examine the political effects of these adjustments in Western countries since the early 1990s using both district-level election outcomes and individual-level voting data. We expect that austerity increases populist votes, but only among economically vulnerable voters, who are hit most by austerity. Following the political economy literature, we identify economically vulnerable regions, looking at the share of low-skilled workers and share of manufacturing production. The results from a difference-in-differences analysis show that austerity increases support for populist parties in economically vulnerable regions, but austerity has little effect on voting in economically less vulnerable regions. These findings are confirmed by the analysis at the individual level. Our results suggest that the success of populist parties across Europe critically hinges on the governments failure to protect the losers of structural economic change. The economic origins of populism, therefore, are not purely external, but the populist backlash is triggered by internal factors, notably public policies.<br>","PeriodicalId":210669,"journal":{"name":"Labor: Human Capital eJournal","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Austerity, Economic Vulnerability, and Populism\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Baccini, T. Sattler\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3766022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Governments have repeatedly adjusted fiscal policy during the past decades. We examine the political effects of these adjustments in Western countries since the early 1990s using both district-level election outcomes and individual-level voting data. We expect that austerity increases populist votes, but only among economically vulnerable voters, who are hit most by austerity. Following the political economy literature, we identify economically vulnerable regions, looking at the share of low-skilled workers and share of manufacturing production. The results from a difference-in-differences analysis show that austerity increases support for populist parties in economically vulnerable regions, but austerity has little effect on voting in economically less vulnerable regions. These findings are confirmed by the analysis at the individual level. Our results suggest that the success of populist parties across Europe critically hinges on the governments failure to protect the losers of structural economic change. The economic origins of populism, therefore, are not purely external, but the populist backlash is triggered by internal factors, notably public policies.<br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":210669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor: Human Capital eJournal\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor: Human Capital eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3766022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor: Human Capital eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3766022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在过去的几十年里,各国政府多次调整财政政策。我们使用地区层面的选举结果和个人层面的投票数据,研究了自20世纪90年代初以来西方国家这些调整的政治影响。我们预计,紧缩会增加民粹主义的选票,但只会在受紧缩打击最严重的经济弱势选民中出现。根据政治经济学文献,我们确定了经济脆弱地区,考察了低技能工人的比例和制造业生产的比例。差异中差异分析结果显示,在经济脆弱地区,紧缩政策增加了民粹主义政党的支持率,但在经济不太脆弱地区,紧缩政策对投票的影响不大。在个体层面上的分析证实了这些发现。我们的研究结果表明,民粹主义政党在欧洲各地的成功,在很大程度上取决于政府未能保护结构性经济变革的输家。因此,民粹主义的经济根源并不纯粹是外部的,民粹主义的反弹是由内部因素引发的,尤其是公共政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Austerity, Economic Vulnerability, and Populism
Governments have repeatedly adjusted fiscal policy during the past decades. We examine the political effects of these adjustments in Western countries since the early 1990s using both district-level election outcomes and individual-level voting data. We expect that austerity increases populist votes, but only among economically vulnerable voters, who are hit most by austerity. Following the political economy literature, we identify economically vulnerable regions, looking at the share of low-skilled workers and share of manufacturing production. The results from a difference-in-differences analysis show that austerity increases support for populist parties in economically vulnerable regions, but austerity has little effect on voting in economically less vulnerable regions. These findings are confirmed by the analysis at the individual level. Our results suggest that the success of populist parties across Europe critically hinges on the governments failure to protect the losers of structural economic change. The economic origins of populism, therefore, are not purely external, but the populist backlash is triggered by internal factors, notably public policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Gender Pay Gap in the Public Sector: Evidence from the Canadian Labour Force Survey Gender Differences in Reactions to Failure in High-Stakes Competition: Evidence from the National College Entrance Exam Retakes Non-compete Agreements, Wages and Efficiency: Theory and Evidence from Brazilian Football What Drives the Finance Academia Wage Premium? How Does Technical Change Affect Worker Productivity in a Multiple-Task Environment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1