美国公民教育:州教育标准反映的视角。

Rebekkah Stuteville, H. Johnson
{"title":"美国公民教育:州教育标准反映的视角。","authors":"Rebekkah Stuteville, H. Johnson","doi":"10.5929/2016.6.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is growing international concern about the lack of civic engagement among the youth in many nations. These concerns have sparked renewed interest in the quantity and quality of civic education in public schools in the United States. The objective of this study is to determine if the concerns about civic education are about the sufficiency of academic content related to civic education or if the concerns reflect a lack of consensus regarding the question of \"What makes a good citizen?\" To address this question, this paper examines state social studies content standards from five U.S. states to determine if specific perspectives on citizenship are present in the standards and which perspectives are emphasized. University websites are also analyzed to assess their focus on citizenship. The study finds that the citizenship education in K-12 schools is robust, and specific perspectives are emphasized. This emphasis on specific perspectives, as opposed to a lack of academic content related to civic education, may be at the heart of the debate over citizenship education.","PeriodicalId":189332,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Issues Journal","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citizenship Education in the United States: Perspective Reflected in State Education Standards.\",\"authors\":\"Rebekkah Stuteville, H. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.5929/2016.6.1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is growing international concern about the lack of civic engagement among the youth in many nations. These concerns have sparked renewed interest in the quantity and quality of civic education in public schools in the United States. The objective of this study is to determine if the concerns about civic education are about the sufficiency of academic content related to civic education or if the concerns reflect a lack of consensus regarding the question of \\\"What makes a good citizen?\\\" To address this question, this paper examines state social studies content standards from five U.S. states to determine if specific perspectives on citizenship are present in the standards and which perspectives are emphasized. University websites are also analyzed to assess their focus on citizenship. The study finds that the citizenship education in K-12 schools is robust, and specific perspectives are emphasized. This emphasis on specific perspectives, as opposed to a lack of academic content related to civic education, may be at the heart of the debate over citizenship education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative Issues Journal\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative Issues Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5929/2016.6.1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Issues Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5929/2016.6.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

国际社会越来越关注许多国家年轻人缺乏公民参与的问题。这些担忧重新引发了人们对美国公立学校公民教育的数量和质量的关注。本研究的目的是确定对公民教育的关注是否与公民教育相关的学术内容的充分性有关,或者这些关注是否反映了对“什么是好公民”这个问题缺乏共识?为了解决这个问题,本文考察了美国五个州的州社会研究内容标准,以确定标准中是否存在关于公民身份的特定观点,以及强调哪些观点。大学网站也被分析来评估他们对公民的关注程度。研究发现,K-12学校的公民教育是稳健的,并强调具体的观点。这种对具体观点的强调,而不是缺乏与公民教育相关的学术内容,可能是关于公民教育的争论的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Citizenship Education in the United States: Perspective Reflected in State Education Standards.
There is growing international concern about the lack of civic engagement among the youth in many nations. These concerns have sparked renewed interest in the quantity and quality of civic education in public schools in the United States. The objective of this study is to determine if the concerns about civic education are about the sufficiency of academic content related to civic education or if the concerns reflect a lack of consensus regarding the question of "What makes a good citizen?" To address this question, this paper examines state social studies content standards from five U.S. states to determine if specific perspectives on citizenship are present in the standards and which perspectives are emphasized. University websites are also analyzed to assess their focus on citizenship. The study finds that the citizenship education in K-12 schools is robust, and specific perspectives are emphasized. This emphasis on specific perspectives, as opposed to a lack of academic content related to civic education, may be at the heart of the debate over citizenship education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
When Culture and Change Collide In Higher Education: A Case Study at One University Authentic Engagement through Workplace Pedagogy MASTERING CRITICAL THINKING COMPETENCIES IN ONLINE GRADUATE CLASSES Gender Difference in STEM Career Aspiration and Social-Cognitive Factors in Collectivist and Individualist Cultures PROTECT STUDENTS’ EDUCATIONAL FUTURES THROUGH SOCIAL CAPITAL OPPORTUNITIES IN SPORT AND NON - SPORT EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1