个性化营养、医学和保健的社区参与性研究/转化生物医学研究策略

A. Williams, C. Wise, D. Lovera, B. McCabe-Sellers, M. Bogle, J. Kaput
{"title":"个性化营养、医学和保健的社区参与性研究/转化生物医学研究策略","authors":"A. Williams, C. Wise, D. Lovera, B. McCabe-Sellers, M. Bogle, J. Kaput","doi":"10.1002/9780470744307.GAT205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Personal and public health information is usually derived from studies of large population groups. Although reported as population attributable risk (PAR), these estimates are often applied to individuals. PARs for intake of nutrients, exposure to toxins, responses to drug, having certain genetic variants, and, more recently, nutrient{--}gene interactions are statistical estimates of the percentage reduction in disease in the population if the risk were to be avoided or the gene variant were not present. Individuals differ in genetic makeup, life-style, and dietary patterns and may not be represented by individuals in the study population. Although these risk factors are valuable guidelines, they may not apply to individuals. Intervention studies are likewise limited by small sample sizes, short time frames to assess physiological changes, and variable experimental designs that often preclude comparative or consensus analyses. A fundamental challenge for personalizing nutritional recommendations to optimize health and medicine for getting the right drug to the right person at the right time will be to develop a means to sort individuals into groups and, eventually, develop risk factors for individuals. The classic case{--}control prospective design may need to be revised in order to develop individual risk factors. A promising approach for more complete analyses of the interaction of genetic makeups and environment relies on translational research strategies where the study participant is physiologically monitored over time. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) methodology is a form of translational research whose central focus is developing a partnership among researchers and individuals in a community that allows for more in-depth life-style analyses but simultaneously helps improve the health of individuals and communities through application of research outcomes. \n \n \nKeywords: \n \ncommunity-based participatory research; \nhealthcare; \nnutrigenomics; \npersonalized nutrition; \npopulation attributable risk; \ntranslational research","PeriodicalId":325382,"journal":{"name":"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Community-Based Participatory Research/Translational Biomedical Research Strategy for Personalizing Nutrition, Medicine, and Healthcare\",\"authors\":\"A. Williams, C. Wise, D. Lovera, B. McCabe-Sellers, M. Bogle, J. Kaput\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9780470744307.GAT205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Personal and public health information is usually derived from studies of large population groups. Although reported as population attributable risk (PAR), these estimates are often applied to individuals. PARs for intake of nutrients, exposure to toxins, responses to drug, having certain genetic variants, and, more recently, nutrient{--}gene interactions are statistical estimates of the percentage reduction in disease in the population if the risk were to be avoided or the gene variant were not present. Individuals differ in genetic makeup, life-style, and dietary patterns and may not be represented by individuals in the study population. Although these risk factors are valuable guidelines, they may not apply to individuals. Intervention studies are likewise limited by small sample sizes, short time frames to assess physiological changes, and variable experimental designs that often preclude comparative or consensus analyses. A fundamental challenge for personalizing nutritional recommendations to optimize health and medicine for getting the right drug to the right person at the right time will be to develop a means to sort individuals into groups and, eventually, develop risk factors for individuals. The classic case{--}control prospective design may need to be revised in order to develop individual risk factors. A promising approach for more complete analyses of the interaction of genetic makeups and environment relies on translational research strategies where the study participant is physiologically monitored over time. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) methodology is a form of translational research whose central focus is developing a partnership among researchers and individuals in a community that allows for more in-depth life-style analyses but simultaneously helps improve the health of individuals and communities through application of research outcomes. \\n \\n \\nKeywords: \\n \\ncommunity-based participatory research; \\nhealthcare; \\nnutrigenomics; \\npersonalized nutrition; \\npopulation attributable risk; \\ntranslational research\",\"PeriodicalId\":325382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470744307.GAT205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General, Applied and Systems Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470744307.GAT205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

个人和公共卫生信息通常来自对大量人口群体的研究。虽然报告为人口归因风险(PAR),但这些估计通常适用于个人。营养摄入、接触毒素、对药物的反应、具有某些遗传变异以及最近的营养{-}基因相互作用方面的par是对人口中疾病减少百分比的统计估计,如果可以避免风险或不存在基因变异。个体在基因组成、生活方式和饮食模式上存在差异,研究人群中的个体可能无法代表这些差异。虽然这些风险因素是有价值的指导方针,但它们可能不适用于个人。干预研究同样受到样本量小,评估生理变化的时间框架短,以及经常排除比较或共识分析的可变实验设计的限制。个性化营养建议以优化健康和药物,使正确的药物在正确的时间给正确的人,这将是一个根本性的挑战,这将是开发一种将个人分类为群体的方法,并最终确定个人的风险因素。经典的病例{-}对照前瞻性设计可能需要修改,以发展个人风险因素。对基因组成和环境的相互作用进行更全面分析的一个有希望的方法依赖于转译研究策略,即研究参与者长期受到生理监测。基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)方法是转化研究的一种形式,其中心重点是在社区中的研究人员和个人之间建立伙伴关系,以便进行更深入的生活方式分析,同时通过应用研究成果帮助改善个人和社区的健康状况。关键词:社区参与式研究;医疗保健;营养基因组学;个性化的营养;人群归因风险;转化研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Community-Based Participatory Research/Translational Biomedical Research Strategy for Personalizing Nutrition, Medicine, and Healthcare
Personal and public health information is usually derived from studies of large population groups. Although reported as population attributable risk (PAR), these estimates are often applied to individuals. PARs for intake of nutrients, exposure to toxins, responses to drug, having certain genetic variants, and, more recently, nutrient{--}gene interactions are statistical estimates of the percentage reduction in disease in the population if the risk were to be avoided or the gene variant were not present. Individuals differ in genetic makeup, life-style, and dietary patterns and may not be represented by individuals in the study population. Although these risk factors are valuable guidelines, they may not apply to individuals. Intervention studies are likewise limited by small sample sizes, short time frames to assess physiological changes, and variable experimental designs that often preclude comparative or consensus analyses. A fundamental challenge for personalizing nutritional recommendations to optimize health and medicine for getting the right drug to the right person at the right time will be to develop a means to sort individuals into groups and, eventually, develop risk factors for individuals. The classic case{--}control prospective design may need to be revised in order to develop individual risk factors. A promising approach for more complete analyses of the interaction of genetic makeups and environment relies on translational research strategies where the study participant is physiologically monitored over time. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) methodology is a form of translational research whose central focus is developing a partnership among researchers and individuals in a community that allows for more in-depth life-style analyses but simultaneously helps improve the health of individuals and communities through application of research outcomes. Keywords: community-based participatory research; healthcare; nutrigenomics; personalized nutrition; population attributable risk; translational research
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Community-Based Participatory Research/Translational Biomedical Research Strategy for Personalizing Nutrition, Medicine, and Healthcare Chemoinformatics and its Applications Species‐Metabolite Relation Database KNApSAcK and Its Multifaceted Retrieval System, KNApSAcK Family Application of DNA Microarray in Studies of Herbal Dietary Supplements Toxicogenomics: An Overview with Special Reference to Genetic and Genomic Approaches to the Identification of Toxic Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1