{"title":"增量预见局部压缩","authors":"Pantung Wijaya, V. Allan","doi":"10.1145/75362.75415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under timing constraints, local compaction may fail because of poor scheduling decisions. Su [SDWX87] uses foresight to avoid some of the poor scheduling decisions. However, the foresight takes a considerable amount of time. In this paper the Incremental Foresight algorithm is introduced. Experiments using four different target architectures show that the Incremental Foresight algorithm works as well as foresight, and saves around 48 percent of the excess time.","PeriodicalId":365456,"journal":{"name":"MICRO 22","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incremental foresighted local compaction\",\"authors\":\"Pantung Wijaya, V. Allan\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/75362.75415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Under timing constraints, local compaction may fail because of poor scheduling decisions. Su [SDWX87] uses foresight to avoid some of the poor scheduling decisions. However, the foresight takes a considerable amount of time. In this paper the Incremental Foresight algorithm is introduced. Experiments using four different target architectures show that the Incremental Foresight algorithm works as well as foresight, and saves around 48 percent of the excess time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MICRO 22\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MICRO 22\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/75362.75415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MICRO 22","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/75362.75415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Under timing constraints, local compaction may fail because of poor scheduling decisions. Su [SDWX87] uses foresight to avoid some of the poor scheduling decisions. However, the foresight takes a considerable amount of time. In this paper the Incremental Foresight algorithm is introduced. Experiments using four different target architectures show that the Incremental Foresight algorithm works as well as foresight, and saves around 48 percent of the excess time.