自主水下航行器风险评估的中性MCDM方法

Shimaa S. Mohamed, A. Abdel-Monem, Alshaimaa A. Tantawy
{"title":"自主水下航行器风险评估的中性MCDM方法","authors":"Shimaa S. Mohamed, A. Abdel-Monem, Alshaimaa A. Tantawy","doi":"10.61356/j.nswa.2023.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to its usefulness in several industries and the military, researchers have concentrated on developing autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). However, AUV navigation continues to be a difficult challenge to solve owing to the variety of underwater settings. The usage of AUVs, or autonomous underwater vehicles, is not without dangers like malfunction, ecological risks, loss of communications, cybersecurity risks, collisions, and others. There are many criteria to assess these risks technical, operational, economic, and regulatory. So, the methods of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is used to deal with these various criteria. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method is an MCDM methodology, that can be used to compute the weights of criteria. The AHP is integrated with the single-valued neutrosophic set (SVNS) to deal with uncertain data in the assessment process. The risks of AUVs are ranked after computing the weights of the criteria. The results show that malfunctions are the highest risk. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":169974,"journal":{"name":"Neutrosophic Systems with Applications","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neutrosophic MCDM Methodology for Risk Assessment of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles\",\"authors\":\"Shimaa S. Mohamed, A. Abdel-Monem, Alshaimaa A. Tantawy\",\"doi\":\"10.61356/j.nswa.2023.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to its usefulness in several industries and the military, researchers have concentrated on developing autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). However, AUV navigation continues to be a difficult challenge to solve owing to the variety of underwater settings. The usage of AUVs, or autonomous underwater vehicles, is not without dangers like malfunction, ecological risks, loss of communications, cybersecurity risks, collisions, and others. There are many criteria to assess these risks technical, operational, economic, and regulatory. So, the methods of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is used to deal with these various criteria. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method is an MCDM methodology, that can be used to compute the weights of criteria. The AHP is integrated with the single-valued neutrosophic set (SVNS) to deal with uncertain data in the assessment process. The risks of AUVs are ranked after computing the weights of the criteria. The results show that malfunctions are the highest risk. \\n  \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":169974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neutrosophic Systems with Applications\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neutrosophic Systems with Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neutrosophic Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61356/j.nswa.2023.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于它在几个工业和军事上的用途,研究人员集中在开发自主水下航行器(auv)上。然而,由于水下环境的多样性,AUV导航仍然是一个难以解决的挑战。使用auv或自主水下航行器并非没有故障、生态风险、通信丢失、网络安全风险、碰撞等危险。评估这些风险的标准有很多——技术上的、操作上的、经济上的和监管上的。因此,多准则决策(MCDM)方法被用于处理这些不同的准则。层次分析法(AHP)是MCDM的一种方法,可用于计算各指标的权重。AHP与单值嗜中性集(SVNS)相结合,以处理评估过程中的不确定性数据。计算各指标的权重后,对auv的风险进行排序。结果表明,故障是风险最高的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neutrosophic MCDM Methodology for Risk Assessment of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles
Due to its usefulness in several industries and the military, researchers have concentrated on developing autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). However, AUV navigation continues to be a difficult challenge to solve owing to the variety of underwater settings. The usage of AUVs, or autonomous underwater vehicles, is not without dangers like malfunction, ecological risks, loss of communications, cybersecurity risks, collisions, and others. There are many criteria to assess these risks technical, operational, economic, and regulatory. So, the methods of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is used to deal with these various criteria. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method is an MCDM methodology, that can be used to compute the weights of criteria. The AHP is integrated with the single-valued neutrosophic set (SVNS) to deal with uncertain data in the assessment process. The risks of AUVs are ranked after computing the weights of the criteria. The results show that malfunctions are the highest risk.    
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Waste Reduction and Recycling: Schweizer-Sklar Aggregation Operators Based on Neutrosophic Fuzzy Rough Sets and Their Application in Green Supply Chain Management A Systematic Approach for Evaluating and Selecting Healthcare Waste Treatment Devices using OWCM-CODAS and Triangular Neutrosophic Sets Leveraging an Uncertainty Methodology to Appraise Risk Factors Threatening Sustainability of Food Supply Chain Exploring the Application of Digital Twin Technology in the Energy Sector using MEREC and MAIRCA Methods Single-Valued Neutrosophic MCDM Approaches Integrated with MEREC and RAM for the Selection of UAVs in Forest Fire Detection and Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1