行政合同的可仲裁性

Mohamed Amin El Mahdi
{"title":"行政合同的可仲裁性","authors":"Mohamed Amin El Mahdi","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2016013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An administrative contract is subject to a legal regime, the essence of which is the consensual nature of the contract combined with the proper functioning of public service. The absence of this feature from the consideration of arbitral tribunals, especially in investment disputes, was the basis of a theoretical gap from which a legal trend affirming a contrast between the nature of administrative contracts and the arbitration system emerged. A legitimate question arises as to whether the recent attention given by arbitration tribunals to this issue, especially in investment disputes, might allow scholars to overcome their differences regarding the arbitrability of administrative contracts.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Arbitrability of Administrative Contracts\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Amin El Mahdi\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/bcdr2016013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An administrative contract is subject to a legal regime, the essence of which is the consensual nature of the contract combined with the proper functioning of public service. The absence of this feature from the consideration of arbitral tribunals, especially in investment disputes, was the basis of a theoretical gap from which a legal trend affirming a contrast between the nature of administrative contracts and the arbitration system emerged. A legitimate question arises as to whether the recent attention given by arbitration tribunals to this issue, especially in investment disputes, might allow scholars to overcome their differences regarding the arbitrability of administrative contracts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BCDR International Arbitration Review\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BCDR International Arbitration Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2016013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2016013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行政合同是一种法律制度,其实质是合同的合意性与公共服务的正常运作相结合。在仲裁法庭的审议中,特别是在投资争端中,缺乏这一特点是理论差距的基础,由此产生了一种肯定行政合同的性质与仲裁制度之间的对比的法律趋势。一个合理的问题是,仲裁法庭最近对这一问题的关注,特别是在投资争端中,是否可能使学者们克服他们对行政合同可仲裁性的分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Arbitrability of Administrative Contracts
An administrative contract is subject to a legal regime, the essence of which is the consensual nature of the contract combined with the proper functioning of public service. The absence of this feature from the consideration of arbitral tribunals, especially in investment disputes, was the basis of a theoretical gap from which a legal trend affirming a contrast between the nature of administrative contracts and the arbitration system emerged. A legitimate question arises as to whether the recent attention given by arbitration tribunals to this issue, especially in investment disputes, might allow scholars to overcome their differences regarding the arbitrability of administrative contracts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changed Circumstances and Oil and Gas Contracts Aramco: The Story of the World’s Most Valuable Oil Concession and Its Landmark Arbitration Petroleum Concessions in Egypt: A Recipe for Disputes? Stabilization Clauses: Do They Have a Future? COVID-19 and the Exceptions to Contractual Liability in Arab Contract Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1