给self的提示:停止调用“自然”接口

Lone Koefoed Hansen, P. Dalsgaard
{"title":"给self的提示:停止调用“自然”接口","authors":"Lone Koefoed Hansen, P. Dalsgaard","doi":"10.7146/AAHCC.V1I1.21316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term \"natural\" is employed to describe a wide range of novel interactive products and systems, ranging from gesture-based interaction to brain-computer interfaces and in marketing as well as in research. However, this terminology is problematic. It establishes an untenable dichotomy between forms of interaction that are natural and those that are not; it draws upon the positive connotations of the term and conflates the language of research with marketing lingo, often without a clear explanation of why novel interfaces can be considered natural; and it obscures the examination of the details of interaction that ought to be the concern of HCI researchers. We are primarily concerned with identifying the problem, but also propose two steps to remedy it: recognising that the terminology we employ in research has consequences, and unfolding and articulating in more detail the qualities of interfaces that we have hitherto labelled \"natural\".","PeriodicalId":297193,"journal":{"name":"Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Note to self: stop calling interfaces \\\"natural\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Lone Koefoed Hansen, P. Dalsgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/AAHCC.V1I1.21316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The term \\\"natural\\\" is employed to describe a wide range of novel interactive products and systems, ranging from gesture-based interaction to brain-computer interfaces and in marketing as well as in research. However, this terminology is problematic. It establishes an untenable dichotomy between forms of interaction that are natural and those that are not; it draws upon the positive connotations of the term and conflates the language of research with marketing lingo, often without a clear explanation of why novel interfaces can be considered natural; and it obscures the examination of the details of interaction that ought to be the concern of HCI researchers. We are primarily concerned with identifying the problem, but also propose two steps to remedy it: recognising that the terminology we employ in research has consequences, and unfolding and articulating in more detail the qualities of interfaces that we have hitherto labelled \\\"natural\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":297193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/AAHCC.V1I1.21316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/AAHCC.V1I1.21316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

“自然”一词被用来描述一系列新颖的交互产品和系统,从基于手势的交互到脑机接口,在营销和研究中都有应用。然而,这个术语是有问题的。它在自然和非自然的互动形式之间建立了一种站不住脚的二分法;它利用了该术语的积极内涵,并将研究语言与营销术语混为一谈,往往没有清楚地解释为什么新颖的界面可以被认为是自然的;它模糊了对相互作用细节的研究,而这些本该是HCI研究人员关注的。我们主要关注的是识别问题,但也提出了两个步骤来补救它:认识到我们在研究中使用的术语有后果,以及更详细地展开和阐明我们迄今为止标记为“自然”的界面的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Note to self: stop calling interfaces "natural"
The term "natural" is employed to describe a wide range of novel interactive products and systems, ranging from gesture-based interaction to brain-computer interfaces and in marketing as well as in research. However, this terminology is problematic. It establishes an untenable dichotomy between forms of interaction that are natural and those that are not; it draws upon the positive connotations of the term and conflates the language of research with marketing lingo, often without a clear explanation of why novel interfaces can be considered natural; and it obscures the examination of the details of interaction that ought to be the concern of HCI researchers. We are primarily concerned with identifying the problem, but also propose two steps to remedy it: recognising that the terminology we employ in research has consequences, and unfolding and articulating in more detail the qualities of interfaces that we have hitherto labelled "natural".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Note to self: stop calling interfaces "natural" Designed in Shenzhen: Shanzhai manufacturing and maker entrepreneurs Charismatic technology Double binds and double blinds: evaluation tactics in critically oriented HCI Gaza everywhere: exploring the applicability of a rhetorical lens in HCI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1