三级烧伤中心包括热带假丝酵母菌在内的假丝酵母菌种类分布及对唑类药物的敏感性

Tae-Hyoung Kim, Y. S. Lee, Mi-Kyung Lee, K. Lee
{"title":"三级烧伤中心包括热带假丝酵母菌在内的假丝酵母菌种类分布及对唑类药物的敏感性","authors":"Tae-Hyoung Kim, Y. S. Lee, Mi-Kyung Lee, K. Lee","doi":"10.5145/KJCM.2010.13.2.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Candida species are the fourth leading cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections and have one of the highest mortality rates among nosocomial pathogens. C. tropicalis has been reported to be one of the leading Candida species other than C. albicans to cause Candida infection in patients who have malignancy, diabetes mellitus, and burn. This study was designed to determine whether burn might influence the species distribution and susceptibilities of azoles against clinical isolates of Candida species including C. tropicalis. Methods: A total 372 Candida isolates from various samples in a tertiary burn center were studied, and the MICs of Candida isolates to fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole were tested by broth microdilution method of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A2. A comparison was made between Candida isolates from burn patients and non-burn patients. Results: The percentages of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata isolates from burn patients and non-burn patients were 42.3% and 64.2% (P=0.000), 35.7% and 21.6% (P=0.002), 11.9% and 7.8%, and 10.1% and 6.4%, respectively. Decreased susceptibilities to fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole were observed more frequently in burn patients (4.76%, 19.05%, and 0.60%, respectively) than non-burn patients (2.45%, 14.22%, and 0%, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that burn may lead to influence the species distribution and susceptibilities to azoles of Candida species. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2010;13:79-84)","PeriodicalId":143093,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Species Distribution and Susceptibilities to Azoles of Candida Species Including C. tropicalis in a Tertiary Burn Center\",\"authors\":\"Tae-Hyoung Kim, Y. S. Lee, Mi-Kyung Lee, K. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.5145/KJCM.2010.13.2.79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Candida species are the fourth leading cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections and have one of the highest mortality rates among nosocomial pathogens. C. tropicalis has been reported to be one of the leading Candida species other than C. albicans to cause Candida infection in patients who have malignancy, diabetes mellitus, and burn. This study was designed to determine whether burn might influence the species distribution and susceptibilities of azoles against clinical isolates of Candida species including C. tropicalis. Methods: A total 372 Candida isolates from various samples in a tertiary burn center were studied, and the MICs of Candida isolates to fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole were tested by broth microdilution method of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A2. A comparison was made between Candida isolates from burn patients and non-burn patients. Results: The percentages of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata isolates from burn patients and non-burn patients were 42.3% and 64.2% (P=0.000), 35.7% and 21.6% (P=0.002), 11.9% and 7.8%, and 10.1% and 6.4%, respectively. Decreased susceptibilities to fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole were observed more frequently in burn patients (4.76%, 19.05%, and 0.60%, respectively) than non-burn patients (2.45%, 14.22%, and 0%, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that burn may lead to influence the species distribution and susceptibilities to azoles of Candida species. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2010;13:79-84)\",\"PeriodicalId\":143093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5145/KJCM.2010.13.2.79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5145/KJCM.2010.13.2.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:念珠菌是院内血液感染的第四大原因,也是院内病原体中死亡率最高的病原体之一。据报道,除白色念珠菌外,热带念珠菌是引起恶性肿瘤、糖尿病和烧伤患者念珠菌感染的主要念珠菌之一。本研究旨在确定烧伤是否会影响氮唑对包括热带假丝酵母在内的假丝酵母临床分离株的种类分布和敏感性。方法:对某三级烧伤中心不同样本分离的372株念珠菌进行研究,采用美国临床与实验室标准协会(CLSI) M27-A2肉液微量稀释法检测念珠菌对氟康唑、伊曲康唑和伏立康唑的mic。对烧伤患者与非烧伤患者分离的念珠菌进行了比较。结果:烧伤患者和非烧伤患者中白色念珠菌、热带念珠菌、副枯枝念珠菌和光秃念珠菌分离率分别为42.3%和64.2% (P=0.000)、35.7%和21.6% (P=0.002)、11.9%和7.8%、10.1%和6.4%。烧伤患者对氟康唑、伊曲康唑和伏立康唑的敏感性降低发生率分别为4.76%、19.05%和0.60%,高于非烧伤患者(分别为2.45%、14.22%和0%)。结论:烧伤可能影响念珠菌的种类分布和对唑类药物的敏感性。(中华临床微生物学杂志2010;13:79-84)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Species Distribution and Susceptibilities to Azoles of Candida Species Including C. tropicalis in a Tertiary Burn Center
Background: Candida species are the fourth leading cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections and have one of the highest mortality rates among nosocomial pathogens. C. tropicalis has been reported to be one of the leading Candida species other than C. albicans to cause Candida infection in patients who have malignancy, diabetes mellitus, and burn. This study was designed to determine whether burn might influence the species distribution and susceptibilities of azoles against clinical isolates of Candida species including C. tropicalis. Methods: A total 372 Candida isolates from various samples in a tertiary burn center were studied, and the MICs of Candida isolates to fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole were tested by broth microdilution method of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A2. A comparison was made between Candida isolates from burn patients and non-burn patients. Results: The percentages of C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis and C. glabrata isolates from burn patients and non-burn patients were 42.3% and 64.2% (P=0.000), 35.7% and 21.6% (P=0.002), 11.9% and 7.8%, and 10.1% and 6.4%, respectively. Decreased susceptibilities to fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole were observed more frequently in burn patients (4.76%, 19.05%, and 0.60%, respectively) than non-burn patients (2.45%, 14.22%, and 0%, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that burn may lead to influence the species distribution and susceptibilities to azoles of Candida species. (Korean J Clin Microbiol 2010;13:79-84)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity of Integrons Carrying blaVIM-2 Cassette in Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. A Case of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Caused by Arcanobacterium haemolyticum and Streptococcus agalactiae Haemophilus parainfluenzae Infective Endocarditis Confirmed by 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis from Culture Negative Tissue An Unusual Feature of Malaria: Exflagellated Microgametes of Malarial Parasites in Human Peripheral Blood Lung Abscess and Bacteremia Caused by Neisseria flavescens and Streptococcus sanguis in Patient with Idiopathic Hypereosinophilic Syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1